Ethics in Public Health Research Essay

Ethics in Public Health Research Essay
You will need to discuss the fragile balance between the need for public health agencies to acquire data and the demand for security of sensitive information. Review the article Ethics in Public Health Research. 
As public health director in a small county, you must maintain records that track diabetes rates, the incidence of HIV, and immunization records. Recently, there have been at least two breaches when computers were stolen from employees or an outside hacker broke into the system and downloaded data. Ethics in Public Health Research Essay.
ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER
Now you must write an open letter addressing the community and explain how the department is going to protect the information. In your letter, address the following questions. Ethics in Public Health Research Essay.
1. Explain why the health department collects this information conveying the idea of how it serves the greater good.
2. Discuss the public’s interest in privacy and why this is important in our society.
3. Discuss why the department needs to infringe on the community’s privacy.
4. Explain how the department might ensure greater security.
5. Be sure to identify at least one applicable regulation, statute, or source that supports the ability of the department to collect this information.
Assignment Expectations
1. Limit your response to 3 pages, not including title and reference pages.
2. Be sure to utilize at least 3-4 scholarly references to support your discussions. Ethics in Public Health Research Essay.
3. Be sure to properly cite your references within the text of your assignment and listed at the end.
4. Be sure to apply critical thinking skills to the write-up of your assignment, especially for numbers 1, and 2 above. Ethics in Public Health Research Essay.

Get a 10 % discount on an order abov
/by

Nutrition Analysis Assignment

Nutrition Analysis Assignment
Go to this link (cut and paste it if you cannot go directly to it by clicking on it) or download the free MyFitnessPal app:
http://www.myfitnesspal.com/
You will need to create a profile.  Make sure to remember all of your log in information as you will use this site for at least 3 different days and most likely more as you will really like it.
Feel free to explore around in this website as it is a good one. For your assignment you need to write down everything that you have eaten (including serving size) for three separate days. Once you have your list for one of the days you are going to click into FOOD.  Everything you will do for this assignment will be in FOOD but again, check out all the rest that this myfitnesspal has to offer as I use this with all of the athletes and personal training clients I workout.
Follow the directions and enter all of the food that you have eaten for ONE day. You will need to find your food, choose the AMOUNT you ate and when you ate it, then continue to add all the rest of the food you ate for the ONE day.  Once you have put all the food you ate for ONE day go to the bottom of the page and click on the link to view your nutrients for the day.
After all of this is entered you will see anywhere from six to sixteen categories starting with calories or protein.  From this option, in addition to sending me this report, write one paragraph for EACH day discussing at least 5 of the categories and what you could have eaten that day to make each of the 5 categories better.
You will repeat this two more times for two different days, for a total of three separate days that need not be consecutive but must all be turned in together. You can then cut and paste this document into the submission box or attach it as a file.  So you understand?  Three separate days, discussing at least five categories per day, and turning in the report for each day.  Follow the directions exactly as written to get an A.

/by

Nursing Services Delivery Theory: An Open System Approach Paper

Nursing Services Delivery Theory: An Open System Approach Paper

  • Reflect on your organization or one with which you are familiar. Within a particular department or unit in this organization, identify a problem the staff is encountering.
  • Using Table 1 in the Meyer article as a guide, analyze the department or unit, identifying inputs, throughput, output, cycles of events, and negative feedback. Consider whether the problem you have selected relates to input, throughput, output, cycles of events, and/or negative feedback.
  • Think about how you could address the problem: Consider what a desired outcome would be, then formulate related goals and objectives, and translate those goals into policies and procedures.
  • Research professional standards that are pertinent to your identified problem.
  • Reflect on the organization’s mission statement and values. In addition, consider how addressing this problem would uphold the mission and values, while improving the organizational culture and climate.

Write a 3- to 5-page Nursing Services Delivery Theory: An Open System Approach Paper that addresses the following:

  • Describe a department or unit within a health care organization using systems theory terminology. Include a description of inputs, throughput, output, cycles of events, and negative feedback.
  • Describe the problem you identified within the department or unit using an open- systems approach, and state where the problem exists using the systems theory model (input, throughput, output, cycles of events, or negative feedback).
  • Based on this information, explain how you would address the problem as follows:
    • Formulate a desired outcome.
    • Identify goals and objectives that would facilitate that outcome.
    • Translate those goals and objectives into policies and procedures for the department or unit.
    • Describe relevant professional standards.
  • Explain in your Nursing Services Delivery Theory: An Open System Approach Paper how your proposed resolution to the problem would uphold the organization’s mission and values and improve the culture and climate.
/by

Head-to-Toe Assessment Essay

Head-to-Toe Assessment Essay

Head-to-Toe Assessment  For this assignment, perform a complete head-to-toe assessment on one of your chosen participants. Your analysis should include the following:
•Topical headings to delineate systems.
•For any system for which you do not have equipment, explain how you would do the assessment.
•Detailed review of each system with normal and abnormal findings, along with normal laboratory findings for client age.
•An analysis of age-specific risk reduction, health screen, and immunizations.
•Your expectation of normal findings and what might indicate abnormal findings in your review of systems.
•The differential diagnosis (disease) associated with possible abnormal findings.
•A plan of care (including nursing diagnosis, interventions, evaluation). Head-to-Toe Assessment Essay .
•Client and age-appropriate evidenced based practice strategies for health promotion.
•Pharmacological treatments that can be used to address health issues for this client.   Provide your answers in a 6- to 7-page Microsoft Word document.   Support your responses with examples.   On a separate references page, cite all sources using APA format. Head-to-Toe Assessment Essay .
•Use this APA Citation Helper as a convenient reference for properly citing resources.
•This handout will provide you the details of formatting your essay using APA style.
•You may create your essay in this APA-formatted template. Head-to-Toe Assessment Essay
/by

How can the QSEN competencies for nurses be implemented

How can the QSEN competencies for nurses be implemented
Core Competencies for Nurses
This week’s graded discussion topic relates to the following Course Outcome (CO).

  • CO8 Selects evidence for best practice when planning professional nursing care for individuals, families, aggregates, and communities. (PO 8)

Explore the website for the Quality and Safety Education for Nurses (QSEN) initiative at http://www.qsen.org (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.. How can the QSEN competencies for nurses be implemented into your workplace or professional nursing setting? If you are not currently employed as a nurse, consider a previous work setting that would have benefited from implementation of the QSEN competencies. How can the QSEN competencies for nurses be implemented

/by

Diet Analysis Program

Diet Analysis BIO 115 / Marsh
Diet Analysis Report Instructions
Write a diet analysis of your 3 day diet using your 3 Day Average from your diet analysis program.
1. Compare your nutrient intake to your goal.
2. Identify each nutrient that you had more than 20% excess or 20%
deficient of your goal. This means that every nutrient with an
intake below 80% or above 120% should be part of your written
analysis.
3. For each nutrient that is below 80%, state how you
would improve your nutrient intake. You should list 3
sources that are high in that specific nutrient. You can
use your text book, credible internet sources and the
handouts that you received from the oral presentations.
Example:
Deficiencies:
Carbohydrates:
goal – 210 g
Intake – 135 g
I could eat more potatoes, oatmeal and pasta.
4. For each nutrient that is in excess, list the 3 highes sources of that nutrient from the
spread sheet reports.
Example:
Excess
Vitamin A:
goal – 1000 RE
Intake – 1271 RE
My 3 highest sources of vitamin A were garden salad, baby carrots and cheese pizza.
When you are finished with your analysis, write a summary and state your educated nutritional opinion of your diet. Make sure that you answer the following questions.
· What are your dietary goals?
· Did you make any changes as a result of this project?
· Do you take a vitamin or mineral supplement?
· Do you drink enough water?
· Do you exercise?
Grading
Submit your analysis paper that you wrote with your PDF print of your report for the
Diet Analysis Program.

/by

Research Method A30

Research Method A30
Using  the Chapter 3 Outline for a Qualitative, Quantitative, or Mixed Methods  Study in the Doctoral Project Manual. Read the description and complete  a draft of Chapter 3. Include the Chapter 3 Doctoral Project Assessment  Rubric.  Use course materials and assignments to facilitate the  completion of Chapter Three. Use your previous paper topic and research  question(s) for this assignment. Use the following Outline:
1.  An introduction which encompasses the re-statement of the problem and the research questions. For a quantitative study the hypotheses as well.
2. Research  Method-A statement of either qualitative or quantitative methodology  should follow.  Include a discussion of how the research design whether  phenomenological, narrative, case studies, correlational, descriptive,  causal-comparative, or quasi-experimental is the legitimate, appropriate  research design. Use at least two peer-reviewed sources to ground your  discussion.
3. Participants–The  candidate will describe the location of the participants; discuss the  criteria for selecting those participants (i.e., what characteristics do  they possess that make them suitable for the area of investigation) and  the process by which they were selected (such as random sampling,  snowball, etc.); provide the number of participants in the study,  including any important distinctions existing between them (e.g., gender  or ethnicity).
4. Instrumentation—  Provide a description of the instruments or protocols that will be used  surveys, interviews, observations, or artifacts. Include all  instrumentation as an appendix. Describe in detail the instruments to be  used in the study. All questions or criteria should be clearly linked  to the literature presented in chapter two.
5. Data  Collection–The candidate will provide a concise but thorough  description of the steps used to collect data from the participants.  Describe any recruitment processes and/or communication; describe the  informed consent process; and note the data collection schedule.  If  interviews are conducted indicate the length, the number, where  conducted, and stipulate they will be recorded. For surveys describe the  procedures for how they will be distributed and collected. Include all  other procedures and processes needed in order to replicate the study.   If artifacts are used, describe the process by which the data will be  procured, selected, and utilized. For any other methods of data  collection provide a complete description of all processes.
6. Data  Analysis-The candidate describes the analysis of the data that was  performed as well as the specific steps taken.  It is important to  reference a research methods book to detail this process. Researcher  bias, validity, reliability and other research factors should be  addressed as appropriate.
7. Limitations and Delimitations- Provide a detailed discussion of the limitations and delimitations of the study in this section.
Submit paper of your discussion using points of emphasis above. 8 to 10 pages.
Book
American Psychological Association    (2010).   Publication manual of the American Psychological Association .   (6th Edition).   Washington, D.C.
Book
Creswell, J. W.    (2013).   Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches.   Sage.     9781452226101

/by

&&&&&&& Social Work, 34(4), 309–313. Retrieved from the Walden Library databases. The authors discuss cultural competence as part of a patient-centered perspective on health care delivery. They examine an approach to creating innovation that originates at the unit (microsystem) level and can be diffused to the larger health care environment (macrosystem).

 Nursing homework help

Discussion: Comparing Frameworks for Analyzing Organizations

Avedis Donabedian’s work generated a pivotal means of assessing organizational performance relative to structure, process, and outcomes. However, it is clearly not sufficient to view health care quality merely in terms of outcomes—the structures and processes that facilitate these outcomes are equally as important.
In this Discussion, you consider multiple frameworks that can be used to analyze an organization. As you proceed, consider how these frameworks allow you to examine the interplay of interdependent and related parts and processes that comprise the systems within an organization, as well as the arrangements or structures that connect these parts.
To prepare:

  • Investigate and reflect on the systems and structures of an organization with which you are familiar. Consider the following:
    • What is the reporting structure?
    • Who holds formal and informal authority?
    • How many layers of management are there between the frontline and the highest office-holders of the organization?
    • How are interdisciplinary teams organized?
    • How is communication facilitated?
    • How well integrated is decision making among clinical personnel and administrative professionals?
    • How are particular service lines organized?
    • Which departments, groups, and/or individuals within the organization are responsible for monitoring matters related to performance, such as quality and finances?
  • Select two of the following frameworks:
    • Learning organizations, presented in the Elkin, Haina, and Cone article
    • Complex adaptive systems (CAS), presented in the Nesse, Kutcher, Wood, and Rummans article
    • Clinical microsystems, presented in the Sabino, Friel, Deitrick, and Sales-Lopez article
    • Good to great, presented in the Geller article
    • The 5 Ps, presented in the ASHP Foundation article
  • Review the Learning Resources for each of the frameworks that you selected. Also conduct additional research to strengthen your understanding of how to use each framework to assess an organization.
  • Compare the two frameworks. How could each framework be used to identify opportunities to improve performance? In particular, how would you use each of these frameworks to analyze the organization that you have selected?
By Day 3

Post an analysis of the systems and structures of the organization you selected, sharing specific examples. Explain insights that you gained by comparing the two frameworks, and how each can be used to assess an organization, identify a need for improvement, and, ultimately, enhance the performance of an organization.
 

Hickey, J. V., & Brosnan, C. A. (2017). Evaluation  of health care quality in for DNPs (2nd  ed.). New York, NY: Springer Publishing Company.
Chapter 1, “Evaluation and DNPs: The Mandate for Evaluation” (pp. 3-36)
Chapter 3, “Conceptual Models for Evaluation in Advanced Nursing Practice” (pp. 61-86)
Chapter 6, “Evaluating Organizations and Systems” (pp. 127-142)Chapter 1 defines microsystem, mesosystem, and macrosystem and notes that evaluation can focus on one of these levels or all three. Chapter 5 examines the evaluation of organizations and systems.

Sadeghi, S., Barzi, A., Mikhail, O., & Shabot, M. M. (2013). Integrating quality and strategy in health care organizations, Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Publishers.
Chapter 2, “Understanding the Healthcare Organization” (pp. 31–43)Although this chapter focuses on hospitals, the authors provide information about strategic planning and organizational structure that is applicable in many health care settings. The authors examine financial and quality issues as key aspects of performance measurement.

Elkin, G., Zhang, H., & Cone, M. (2011). The acceptance of Senge’s learning organisation model among managers in China: An interview study. International Journal of Management, 28(4), 354–364.
Retrieved from the Walden Library databases.
This article outlines the five disciplines that Senge argued could be found in a learning organization. The authors also discuss the worldview that is inherent in business organizations in China and explain how this relates to Senge’s theory.

Geller, E. S. (2006). From good to great in safety: What does it take to be world class? Professional Safety, 51(6), 35–40.
Retrieved from the Walden Library databases.
Geller reviews and applies Collin’s foundational Good to Great theory from its focus on financial success to safety.

Nesse, R. E., Kutcher, G., Wood, D., & Rummans, T. (2010). Framing change for high-value healthcare systems. Journal for Healthcare Quality, 32(1), 23–28.
Retrieved from the Walden Library databases.
This article explores how to implement change in complex adaptive systems (CAS) such as health care. The authors purport that an understanding of the principles of change management in CAS is critical for success.

Sabino, J. N., Friel, T., Deitrick, L. M., & Salas-Lopez, D. (2009). Striving for cultural competence in an HIV program: The transformative impact of a microsystem in a larger health network. Health & Social Work, 34(4), 309–313.
Retrieved from the Walden Library databases.
The authors discuss cultural competence as part of a patient-centered perspective on health care delivery. They examine an approach to creating innovation that originates at the unit (microsystem) level and can be diffused to the larger health care environment (macrosystem).

/by

‘s Chariot Analogy

,
 Psychology homework help
  Philosophy 101:
Essay Paper Assignment
Compare the Buddhist Simile of the Chariot and Plato’s Chariot Analogy. How are the same and how are the different?
1. Paper must be typed and submitted in a file format that is commonly readable (Word or .rtf files are best).
2. Paper should be 6-7 pages in length when double-spaced and using a 12 point font.
3. Include at least four sources; the textbook may be used as one of your sources.
4. Please DO NOT cite any online reference encyclopedias such as Wikipedia, Britannica, or Encarta.
5. Your sources should consist of scholarly journal articles and books available through the Ivy Tech Virtual Library ONLY.
6. All sources must be cited (must have an end note or a foot note) and the source included in a bibliography. The format of the citations and bibliography must be of a nationally accepted formatting system such as MLA or APA.
Essays will be graded based upon the criteria given below:
COMMAND OF TOPIC
The essay identifies and describes the premises of the philosophical position based on written accounts of it, and articulates a personal position on a philosophical topic.
ARGUMENTATIVE DEVELOPMENT
Essay develops a valid, rational argument to defend or condemn a philosophical position.
ORGANIZATION
Student has edited the essay, ensuring that sentences are clear and logical.
WRITING MECHANICS & SYNTAX
Essay is free from errors in word choice and writing mechanics.
/by

Describe the stage of program implementation

 Psychology homework help
 
Discussion 1: Reporting a Process Evaluation
Just as in needs assessments, interviews and focus groups are common tools for obtaining information about the processes involved in the implementation of programs. Process evaluation should include specifics about purpose, questions which the evaluation will address, and methods that social workers will use to conduct evaluations.
Review the many examples of process evaluation results described in Chapter 8 of Dudley, J. R. (2014). Social work evaluation: Enhancing what we do. (2nd ed.) Chicago, IL: Lyceum Books, or in the optional resources. Select an example of a process evaluation that produced valuable information. Compare the description of those results with the Social Work Research Qualitative Groups case study located in this week’s resources.
· Post a description of the process evaluation that you chose and explain why you selected this example. · Describe the stage of program implementation in which the evaluation occurred, the informants, the questions asked, and the results.· Based upon your comparison of the case study and the program evaluation report that you chose, improve upon the information presented in the case study by identifying gaps in information.· Fill in these gaps as if you were the facilitator of the focus group. Clearly identify the purpose of the process evaluation and the questions asked.References (use 3 or more)Dudley, J. R. (2014). Social work evaluation: Enhancing what we do. (2nd ed.) Chicago, IL: Lyceum Books.
Chapter 8, “Improving How Programs and Practice Work” (pp. 167–207)
Plummer, S.-B., Makris, S., & Brocksen S. (Eds.). (2014b). Social work case studies: Concentration year. Baltimore, MD: Laureate International Universities Publishing. [Vital Source e-reader].
Read the following section:
“Social Work Research: Qualitative Groups” (pp. 68–69)
Document: Bliss, M. J., & Emshoff, J. G. (2002). Workbook for designing a process evaluation. Retrieved from http://beta.roadsafetyevaluation.com/evaluationguides/info/workbook-for-designing-a-process-evaluation.pdf (PDF)
Georgia Department of Human Resources, Division of Public Health.
/by