Select a nursing research article from the list below that includes a theoretical or conceptual framework and the exploration of a clinical problem. Identify the nursing research article components using the Week 5 research template.

(All articles are available in the South University Online Library.)

Emotional Work and Diversity in Clinical Placements of Nursing Students

Nurses’ Preparedness and Perceived Competence in Managing Disasters

The Lived Experiences of People with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Phenomenological Study

Effects of Multivitamin Supplements on Cognitive Function, Serum Homocysteine Level, and Depression of Korean Older Adults with Mild Cognitive Impairment in Care Facilities

The template will be evaluated on the effectiveness of the discussion of the following components. If a component is not present in the article, its absence should be discussed.

• Identify the research problem.
• Identify the research purpose.
• Summarize the review of literature.
• Identify the nursing framework or theoretical perspective.
• Identify the research questions and hypotheses.
• Identify the variables.
• Identify and discuss the appropriateness of the design.
• Discusses the validity and reliability of the instruments, tools, or surveys.
• Discuss the significance of the study. Did it resolve the question?
• Discuss the legal and ethical issues of the study. Include the use of human subjects and their protection.
• Describe any cultural aspects of the study.
• Describe the final sample.
• Describe the procedures for data collection.
• Summarize the results including statistical analysis used or other method of analysis.
• Describe how the results of the research may impact future nursing practice.
• Apply the research to the student’s nursing practice.
• NOTE: If a component is absent, student receives a zero for that component.

Submission Details:

• Cite any resources in APA style and include a copy of the article with the submission.
• By the due date assigned, submit your template to the Submissions Area.

320
200 160 120 100 80 60
40
18
5-for-1
Percent shares traded
45 30 15
Target Price Range 2023 2024 2025
CME GROUP NDQ-CME 168.93 24.8 25.522.0 1.19 2.0% TIMELINESS 3 Lowered 6/12/20 SAFETY 2 Raised 4/17/15 TECHNICAL 4 Lowered 10/9/20 BETA .95 (1.00 = Market)
18-Month Target Price Range Low-High Midpoint (% to Mid)
$131-$280 $206 (20%)
2023-25 PROJECTIONS Ann’l Total
Price Gain Return High 205 (+20%) 7% Low 155 (-10%) Nil Institutional Decisions
4Q2019 1Q2020 2Q2020 to Buy 521 446 487 to Sell 402 496 448 Hld’s(000) 308261 306550 303060
High: 69.2 70.6 64.7 60.9 84.7 93.9 100.9 124.0 155.3 197.1 224.9 225.4 Low: 31.0 46.9 47.0 44.9 51.0 66.4 83.4 81.9 113.3 143.7 161.0 131.8
% TOT. RETURN 8/20 THIS VL ARITH.*
STOCK INDEX 1 yr. -17.8 8.7 3 yr. 46.9 17.6 5 yr. 104.5 45.6
CAPITAL STRUCTURE as of 6/30/20 Total Debt $3440.9 mill. Due In 5 Yrs $1000 mill. LT Debt $3440.9 mill. LT Interest $175.0 mill. (Tot. Int. Coverage: 16.1x) (11% of Cap’l)
Leases, Uncapitalized Annual rentals $63.8 mill. Pension Assets-12/19 $345.9 mill.
Oblig. $324.2 mill. Pfd. Stock None Common Stock 358,623,764 shs. as of 7/15/20 Excl. 3,138 Class B shs. Three seats on the board of dir. are voted on by Class B shareholders only.
MARKET CAP: $58.1 billion (Large Cap) CURRENT POSITION 2018 2019 6/30/20
($MILL.) Cash Assets F 1447.4 1634.6 1493.5 Receivables 553.3 491.8 532.1 Other 39886.0 37567.8 79760.6 Current Assets 41886.7 43692.3 81786.2 Accts Payable 53.9 61.9 88.0 Debt Due – 574.2 – – – – Other 40582.4 38460.0 80113.4 Current Liab. 41272.6 38522.5 80201.4
ANNUAL RATES Past Past Est’d ’17-’19 of change (per sh) 10 Yrs. 5 Yrs. to ’23-’25 Revenues 5.0% 6.5% 5.5% ‘‘Cash Flow’’ 10.0% 18.5% 2.5% Earnings 10.0% 20.5% 2.5% Dividends 13.0% 9.0% 4.0% Book Value 3.0% 2.5% 6.0%
Cal- Full endar Year
QUARTERLY REVENUES ($ mill.) A Mar.31 Jun. 30 Sep. 30 Dec. 31
2017 929.3 924.6 890.8 900.0 3644.7 2018 1109.0 1059.6 904.2 1236.6 4309.4 2019 1179.6 1272.7 1277.3 1138.4 4868.0 2020 1522.1 1182.3 1300 1315.6 5320 2021 1550 1250 1350 1325 5475 Cal- Full
endar Year EARNINGS PER SHARE B
Mar.31 Jun. 30 Sep. 30 Dec. 31 2017 1.18 1.22 .91 8.63 11.94 2018 1.76 1.66 1.21 1.09 5.71 2019 1.39 1.43 1.78 1.31 5.91 2020 2.14 1.40 1.81 1.35 6.70 2021 2.25 1.50 1.85 1.40 7.00 Cal- Full
endar Year QUARTERLY DIVIDENDS PAID C
Mar.31 Jun.30 Sep.30 Dec.31 2016 .60 .60 .60 .60 2.40 2017 .66 .66 .66 .66 2.64 2018 .70 .70 .70 .70 2.80 2019 .75 .75 .75 .75 3.00 2020 .85 .85 .85
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 4.29 5.32 6.26 6.59 7.71 7.86 8.99 9.92 8.78 8.67 9.20 9.87 10.63 10.74 1.60 2.15 2.76 2.99 3.26 3.04 3.47 3.83 3.45 3.28 3.72 4.08 4.92 12.31 1.28 1.76 2.32 3.15 3.20 2.66 3.09 3.41 3.02 2.92 3.35 3.69 4.53 11.94 .21 .37 .50 .69 .92 .92 .92 1.12 1.79 1.80 1.88 2.00 2.40 2.64 .39 .50 .50 .61 .60 .47 .48 .52 .43 .37 .42 .34 .27 .24
4.75 6.47 8.72 46.19 56.27 58.04 60.02 65.18 64.55 62.43 61.82 61.00 60.14 66.07 171.06 172.98 174.18 266.41 332.10 332.56 334.24 330.64 331.83 338.85 338.45 336.94 338.24 339.24
21.3 30.6 40.0 36.6 24.9 20.2 19.1 16.4 17.9 23.7 22.8 25.4 22.1 10.6 1.13 1.63 2.16 1.94 1.50 1.35 1.22 1.03 1.14 1.33 1.20 1.28 1.16 .53 .8% .7% .5% .6% 1.2% 1.7% 1.6% 2.0% 3.3% 2.6% 2.5% 2.1% 2.4% 2.1%
3003.7 3280.6 2914.6 2936.3 3112.5 3326.8 3595.2 3644.7 66.0% 65.5% 58.8% 60.4% 61.1% 63.7% 64.9% 66.5% 129.9 128.5 136.9 135.1 132.6 129.2 129.2 113.0
1028.4 1137.6 1006.3 976.8 1127.1 1247.0 1534.1 4063.4 41.2% 42.0% 38.8% 38.9% 36.4% 36.3% 32.9% – – 34.2% 34.7% 34.5% 33.3% 36.2% 37.5% 42.7% NMF 606.3 1330.6 1101.0 1094.6 1014.1 1080.0 1085.9 1233.6
2104.8 2106.8 2106.8 2107.2 2107.9 2241.4 2231.2 2233.1 20060 21552 21419 21155 20924 20552 20341 22412 5.0% 5.1% 4.6% 4.5% 5.2% 5.7% 7.1% 16.7% 5.1% 5.3% 4.7% 4.6% 5.4% 6.1% 7.5% 18.1% 3.6% 3.5% 1.9% 1.8% 2.4% 2.8% 4.2% 14.5% 30% 33% 59% 61% 56% 54% 45% 20%
2018 2019 2020 2021 © VALUE LINE PUB. LLC 23-25 12.08 13.62 14.85 15.25 Revenues per sh A 16.65 5.83 6.36 7.20 7.50 ‘‘Cash Flow’’ per sh 9.55 5.71 5.91 6.70 7.00 Earnings per sh B 9.00 2.80 3.00 3.40 3.50 Div’ds Decl’d per sh C 3.60 .33 .69 .65 .65 Cap’l Spending per sh .25
72.64 73.09 74.85 78.40 Book Value per sh D 100.00 356.82 357.47 358.75 359.00 Common Shs Outst’g E 360.00
29.6 32.8 Bold figures are Value Line estimates
Avg Ann’l P/E Ratio 20.0 1.60 1.78 Relative P/E Ratio 1.10
1.7% 1.5% Avg Ann’l Div’d Yield 2.0%
4309.4 4868.0 5320 5475 Revenues ($mill) A 6000 63.3% 56.4% 58.0% 60.0% Operating Margin 75.0% 118.7 158.6 165 175 Depreciation ($mill) 200
1962.2 2116.5 2415 2520 Net Profit ($mill) 3240 29.3% 21.3% 24.5% 24.5% Income Tax Rate 24.5% 45.5% 43.5% 45.4% 46.0% Net Profit Margin 54.0% 614.1 1045.3 1250 1425 Working Cap’l ($mill) 1750
3826.8 3743.2 3400 3400 Long-Term Debt ($mill) 3400 25919 26129 26850 28150 Shr. Equity ($mill) 36000 6.9% 7.4% 8.0% 8.0% Return on Total Cap’l 8.0% 7.6% 8.1% 9.0% 9.0% Return on Shr. Equity 9.0% 3.8% 4.2% 4.5% 4.5% Retained to Com Eq 5.5% 49% 48% 51% 50% All Div’ds to Net Prof 40%
Company’s Financial Strength A Stock’s Price Stability 90 Price Growth Persistence 70 Earnings Predictability 40
(A) Through ’05, rev. are net of securities lend- ing int. expense. (B) Based on dil. shs. EPS may not sum due to rounding. Excl. n/r items: ’07, (72¢); ’08, ($3.88); ’09, (88¢). Next earn-
ings report due late Oct. (C) Div’ds hist. paid in late Mar., Jun., Sept., and Dec. Special divd’s: 10/10/08: $5.00; 3/26/12: $3.00; 12/28/12; $1.30; 1/14/14: $2.60; 1/13/15: $2.00; 1/12/16:
$2.90; 1/12/17: $3.25; 1/28/18: $1.75; 1/16/19: $1.75; 1/15/20: $2.50. (D) Incl. intang. In 2019: $33.035 bill., $92.41/sh. (E) In mill., adj. for split. (F) Incl. collateral from securities lending.
BUSINESS: CME Group Inc. is the world’s largest and most diver- sified derivatives marketplace. It enables clients to trade futures, options, cash, and over-the-counter (OTC) markets, optimize port- folios, and analyze date. It offers a range of global benchmark prod- ucts across major asset classes, incl. interest rates, equity indexes, foreign exchange (FX), agricultural commodities, energy, and met-
als. Clearing/transaction fees (81% of ’19 rev.), Market data (11%), and Other (8%). Acq. CBOT Holdings, 7/07; NYMEX, 8/08. Employs 4,360. Off./dir. own 1.2% of stock, Cap’l World, 10.0%; Vanguard, 7.9%; BlackRock, 7.1% (3/20 proxy). Inc.: DE. Chair/CEO: Terrence A. Duffy. Addr.: 20 S. Wacker Dr., Chicago, IL 60606. Tel.: 312-930-1000. Internet: www.cmegroup.com.
CME Group had somewhat of a breather during the June quarter. Fol- lowing a stellar showing during the first quarter, the top and bottom lines fell, both sequentially and year over year for the latest period. In all, share earnings slipped 2% on a 7% revenue decline. Even though it recorded decent gains in Market Data, Information Services, and Other revenues, clearing and transaction revenues slid al- most 11% during the June quarter, and dragged on its recent performance. Still, the exchange operator ought to post good comparisons this year. Coronavirus-related headwinds and ensu- ing market uncertainty may impact re- sults during the back half of the year, however, the volatile environment could increase trading activity and boost parts of CME’s business. Too, CME will likely bol- ster efficiencies and reduce operating ex- penses, which should aid margins moving forward. All told, share earnings will prob- ably advance between 10% and 15% for the full year, while revenues increase 5%- 10%. Likewise, the top and bottom lines should climb at a low single-digit clip through 2021.
CME Group has been strengthening its operations. The integration of acqui- sitions (including the NEX addition, com- pleted in 2018) should continue to bear fruit in the near term. Meanwhile, it has been focused on product innovation, specif- ically rolling out new offerings or tools and services to help its clients better manage risk and navigate market volatility. For example, in September, CME rolled out the FX Options Volatility Converter Tool. Plus, the exchange operator rolled out several new futures over the last few months, including the reintroduction of 3- year Treasury Note futures, Micro E-mini futures, and water futures. Technological enhancements will likely remain a key priority moving forward. These good quality shares are neutrally ranked for year-ahead price performance. Moreover, this issue does not stand out for its long-term capital ap- preciation potential. CME comes with a Safety rank of 2 and Financial Strength of A, however. And it offers a worthwhile div- idend yield. Consequently, CME holds decent risk adjusted income appeal. Orly Seidman October 9, 2020
LEGENDS 17.0 x ″Cash Flow″ p sh. . . . Relative Price Strength
5-for-1 split 7/12 Options: Yes Shaded area indicates recession
© 2020 Value Line, Inc. All rights reserved. Factual material is obtained from sources believed to be reliable and is provided without warranties of any kind. THE PUBLISHER IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY ERRORS OR OMISSIONS HEREIN. This publication is strictly for subscriber’s own, non-commercial, internal use. No part of it may be reproduced, resold, stored or transmitted in any printed, electronic or other form, or used for generating or marketing any printed or electronic publication, service or product.
To subscribe call 1-800-VALUELINE
RECENT PRICE
P/E RATIO
RELATIVE P/E RATIO
DIV’D YLD( )Trailing:Median: VALUELINE

Baccalaureate nursing – healthcare writers onlyAPA format- if you’re able to write this paper well, and get me an A grade, I will use you for all future papers…and trust me, there will be a lot. price is negotiable.For this week’s assignment, you will prepare an annotated bibliography on a topic related to health care that is currently impacted by a policy change or potential policy change. The policy that is or will impact change should be related to the health care system or nursing specifically. Look for information that shows that the policy, in your opinion, improved or did not improve the health care system or nursing practice.Choose a Policy IssueReview the Unit 3 study activities to read a list of potential policy issues that will give you a foundation to help you determine which policy change you are interested in. Choose one issue to focus on. The area that you choose to focus on could include particular interests that would lead you to explore articles that look at legal, ethical, and regulatory process in health care or nursing practice.What Is an Annotated Bibliography?Use the four articles that you chose, keeping the following information in mind:A bibliography is a list of sources (books, journals, Web sites, periodicals, et cetera) one has used for researching a topic. A bibliography usually just includes the bibliographic information (that is, the author, title, publisher, et cetera).An annotation is a summary or evaluation.Therefore, an annotated bibliography includes a summary or evaluation of each of the sources in the bibliography. For this assignment, you are expected to include both a summary andan evaluation.Your annotations should address the following three areas for EACH of the four articles you select:Summarize: What are the main arguments? What is the point of this article or chapter? What topics are covered? If someone asked what this source is about, what would you say?Evaluate: Is it a useful source? How does it compare with other sources in your bibliography? Is the information reliable? Is this source biased or objective? What is the goal of this source? (Or the goal of the writer?)Reflect: How does the source assist or fit into your practice? Was this source helpful to you? How might this source help you shape an argument (in favor of or against) the topic presented? Has the source changed how you think about this topic?Assignment GradingBe sure to consult the scoring guide for this assignment to see how your work will be graded. Notice that you will be expected to apply APA writing style to write clearly and logically, with correct use of grammar, punctuation, and mechanics. You may wish to consult Chapter 3 and Chapter 4 in the APA manual and the information listed in this unit’s Writing Resources study.Review your annotated bibliography and make sure it is complete, using the checklist below.Components of the annotated bibliography:Begins with a title page that includes your name.Lists citation information for the articles or chapters, formatted in APA style.Each citation is followed by an annotation, approximately one page in length.The bibliography comprises a variety of credible perspectives.The final page consists of a reference list that includes all of your APA-formatted citations, in alphabetical order.The assignment is 6-8 pages long, including the title page and references.Each annotation should contain some or most of the following:Provides the reader with more information about the content of the sources.Consists of a paragraph that is both descriptive and evaluative (about 150 words).Offers both a description and a critical assessment of the articles or chapters being annotated.Gives the reader a sense of the quality of the source.Gives a sense of the argumentative position of the author relative to others in the field.Informs the reader of the relevance, accuracy, and quality of the sources cited.Concisely exposes the author’s point of view and the clarity of the work.Evaluates the appropriateness of expression, and authority.Summarizes the central theme and scope of the article or chapter.Evaluates the authority or background of the author.Comments on the intended audience.Compares or contrasts this work with another you have cited.Explains how this work illuminates your bibliography topic.If you would like to practice formatting APA citations before you submit this first assignment, click on the links, in Resources, to access interactive media that will help you practice.

QUESTION

family legacy nursing essay

Family Analysis Project Submit by 2359 Saturday of Module 5. NOTE: You will create and upload an original Word file for this assignment instead of typing directly into this document. Overview Select one (1) family based on personal/professional acquaintance, to complete a comprehensive, written assessment/analysis using the criteria listed below (based on class notes and readings). DO NOT use your family of orientation (family of origin) or your nuclear (conjugal) family. (For definitions, see the Glossary of Terms in Friedman et al, Family Nursing textbook. Objectives • Examine the impact of functional patterns and role structure on the family. • Examine family relationships and communication patterns. • Identify influences on family health promotion. N3352 Legacy of the Family ©2013 University of Texas at Arlington Page 2 of 5 Grading Rubric Family Analysis Project Target 60 points max Acceptable At least 42 points Unacceptable Less than 42 points Introduction (5 points) Introduction is present and forecasts content of the paper. (4-5 points) Introduction is present and forecasts the content of the paper. (3-4 points) Introduction is present. (0-1 point) Description of Nuclear Family or Variant Family Form (8 points) Comprehensive description of nuclear family or variant family form; demographic trends (composition, form, ages, educational level); developmental stage (7-8 points) Adequate description of nuclear family or variant family form; demographic trends (composition, form, ages, educational level); developmental stage (4-6 points) Minimal description of nuclear family or variant family form; demographic trends (composition, form, ages, educational level); developmental stage. Some elements may be missing. (0-3 point) Sociocultural Data: Cultural/Ethnic Asessment; Social Class Status (5 points) Comprehensive description of the sociocultural data, including an assessment of cultural/ethnic and social class status (4-5 points) Adequate description of the sociocultural data, including an assessment of cultural ethnic and social class status (2-3 points) Minimal description of the sociocultural data, including an assessment of cultural ethnic and social class status (0-1 point) Genogram & Ecomap (14 points) Genogram represents a minimum of 2 generations; Uses correct symbols to demonstrate relationships; Includes symbol legend Ecomap identifies family relationships inside the middle circle; Uses external circles to include representation from multiple formal and informal support systems; Identifies the nature of relationships between family members and support systems; Includes legend (12-14 points) Genogram represents only 1 generation; Uses mostly correct symbols to demonstrate relationships; Includes symbol legend Ecomap identifies family relationships inside the middle circle; Uses external circles to include representation from some formal and informal support systems; Identifies the nature of some of the relationships between family members and support systems; Includes legend (7-11 points) Genogram is incomplete; Uses some correct symbols to demonstrate relationships; Includes symbol legend Ecomap identifies some family relationships inside the middle circle; Uses external circles to include some representation from formal and informal support systems; Identifies the nature of a few of the relationships between family members and support systems; Includes legend. (0-6 points) ©2013 University of Texas at Arlington Page 3 of 5 N3352 Legacy of the Family Environment: Physical Setting (Home, Neighborhood, Community) (5 points) Clearly depicts the physical environment, including the home, neighborhood, and community. (4-5 points) Depicts some of the physical environment, including the home, neighborhood, and community. (2-3 point) Depicts some of the physical environment, including the home, neighborhood, and community. (0-1 point) Communication (5 points) Carefully describes the quality and methods of communication within the family (4-5 points) Generally describes some of the quality and/or methods of communication with the family (2-3 point) Inadequately describes some of the quality or methods of communication with the family (0-1 points) Power Structure: Hierarchy; Power Bases; Coalitions (5 points) Clearly explains the power structure within the family, including the power hierarchy, power bases, and coalitions (4-5 points) Adequately explains the power structure within the family, including the power hierarchy, power bases, and coalitions (2-3 point) Inadequately explains the power structure within the family, including the power hierarchy, power bases, and coalitions (0-1 points) Role Structure: Relationships (Formal & Informal) (5 points) Clearly describes the roles within the family and how they relate to one another, both formally and informally 4-5 (2 points) Adequately describes the roles within the family and how they relate to one another, both formally and informally (2-3 point) Inadequately describes the roles within the family and/or how they relate to one another (0-1 points) Values: Norms & Rules (5 points) Thoroughly explains the values of the family as demonstrated through its norms and rules (4-5 points) Adequately explains the values of the family as demonstrated through its norms and rules (2-3 point) Inadequately explains the values of the family as demonstrated through its norms and rules (0-1 points) Spiritual Activities (5 points) Thoroughly explains the spiritual activities of the family and their role in their lives (4-5 points) Adequately explains the spiritual activities of the family and their role in their lives (2-3 point) Inadequately explains the spiritual activities of the family and their role in their lives (0-1 points) Socialization: Child Rearing Practices; Intrafamily Support/Social Network; Recreational/ Leisure Activities (5 points) Carefully explains each aspect of socialization in the family unit as outlined to the left. (4-5 points) Explains some aspects of socialization in the family unit as outlined to the Left. (2-3. Points) Fails to explain some aspects of socialization in the family unit as outlined to the left. (0-1 points) ©2013 University of Texas at Arlington Page 4 of 5 N3352 Legacy of the Family Adaptation: Role Conflicts/ Overload/ Changes; Coping Strategies (Functional & Dysfunctional); ProblemSolving Skills (4 points) Effectively explains the adaptability of the family through its role conflicts, handling of overload/changes, coping strategies, both functional & dysfunctional, and problem-solving skills (3-4 points) Attempts to explain the adaptability of the family through some of the following: handling of role conflicts, handling of overload/changes, coping strategies, both functional & dysfunctional, and problem-solving skills (1-2 point) No attempt to explain the adaptability of the family through some of the following: handling of role conflicts, handling of overload/changes, coping strategies, both functional & dysfunctional, and problem-solving skills (0-1 points) Health Care: a.Beliefs Regarding Health/ Illness b.Practices Including Promotion/ Prevention Efforts 5 points) Comprehensively covers the healthcare beliefs regarding health and illness, as well as practices to promote health and prevent illness. (4-5 points) Adequately covers the healthcare beliefs regarding health and illness, as well as practices to promote health and prevent illness. (2-3 points) Minimally covers some of the healthcare beliefs regarding health and illness, as well as practices to promote health and prevent illness. (0-1 points) Interventions: a.Recommendations for Strengthening /Maintaining the Family’s Health b.Discuss Interventions Based on at Least One Theoretical Framework 1) Health Belief Model (textbook, pp. 431- 432) or 2) Health Promotion Model (pp. 432-434) (14 points) Completely outlines recommendations for strengthening/maintaini ng the family’s health and discusses interventions based on at least one theoretical framework from the Health Belief Model mentioned in the textbook (pp. 431-432) or from the Health Promotion Model (pp. 432-434) (12-14 points) Outlines recommendations for strengthening/maintain the family’s health and discusses interventions based on at least one theoretical framework from the Health Belief Model mentioned in the textbook (pp. 431-432) or from the Health Promotion Model (pp. 432-434) (9-11 points) Offers a few recommendations for strengthening/ maintaining the family’s health and discusses a few interventions. (0-8 points) Summary/Conclusion (5 points) Includes summary and conclusion (4-5 points) Includes summary and conclusion (2-3 points) Missing summary and/or conclusion (0-1 points) Format, Length, and Quality of Writing (5 points) Accurately follows APA format, is within the required length, and is free of errors. (4-5 points) Mostly follows APA format, is within the required length, and has few errors. (2-3 points) Loosely follows APA format, is within the required length, and contains many errors. (0-1 point) ©2013 University of Texas at Arlington Page 5 of 5 N3352 Legacy of the Family Instructions Once you have selected the family to study, begin your analysis. Use the Rubric on the previous pages to guide your work. CONFIDENTIALITY ALERT! DO NOT USE LAST NAMES FOR FAMILIES THAT ARE PERSONAL OR PROFESSIONAL ACQUAINTANCES. USE INITIALS or FIRST NAMES ONLY. Address each criterion listed in the Rubric in sufficient depth to reflect the data you obtained, your analysis of the data, and your recommendations for interventions. Be sure to include specific examples to validate your analysis. You must use references (textbook, class notes, others), and these must be cited throughout your paper. Submit your analysis in formal writing, typed using APA format. The limit is six (6) content pages. Once your paper is complete, you will follow the on-screen instructions to upload the document into the system.