1.) Discuss 500 words or more discuss why Security as a Service is a good investment.
Use at least four sources. Use the Research Databases available from the Danforth Library as your first choice. Include at least 3 quotes from your sources enclosed in quotation marks and cited in-line by reference to your reference list. Example: “words you copied” (citation) These quotes should be one full sentence not altered or paraphrased. Cite your sources using APA format. Use the quotes in your paragraphs. Stand alone quotes will not count toward the 3 required quotes.
Write in essay format not in bulleted, numbered or other list format.
2.) In 200-300 words Explain how cookies can show that a user has visited a site if that user’s history has been deleted. Use your own words.
ART330
Essay Module 4
Directions:
Each essay must consist of at least 700 words (this equals two double-spaced pages in Times New Roman font 12), must be in complete sentences and where necessary, appropriate information must be properly documented in MLA style.
This essay, worth forty (40) points, (This Assignment Box maybe linked to Turnitin.)
Turnitin is a plagiarism identification service that can also assist students with term paper reference methodology. The Turnitin tool compares your writing against all published sources and also checks against previous classes’ written work(s). Source match cannot be more than 10%.
Essay Question Options:
2. How does government sponsorship influence the arts and creativity? In what ways were the WPA-funded photography projects of Dorothea Lange and Walker Evans different from the Nazi-approved documentaries of Leni Riefenstahl? In what ways were the WPA-funded projects propaganda?
Article Review Instructions
Perform an article review of “Why Federalism Matters” by Clarence Thomas and one other article (by either Nivola or Rubin), found in “Additional Materials” folder under “Reading & Study” in Module 2.
In your synthesis, answer the questions: Is the federalism established by the founding fathers still relevant? Why or why not, according to Thomas and Nivola/Rubin)?
Article Reviews Instructions
Reviews should cover 2 of the articles in “Additional Materials” under the “Reading and Assignments” folder for the module/week in which it is assigned.
Do not quote from the article. Instead, summarize and paraphrase in your own words.
The reviews should include:
1. Annotated Bibliography [300–400 words each; 1 entry for each source]
a. Bibliographic citation in current Turabian style.
b. Annotation: brief description/summary of the article, including identifying the research question/thesis, methodology employed, evidence or data presented, major findings, and overall strengths or weaknesses of the research.
2. Synthesis: answer the following questions to analyze both articles [750–800 words].
a. How do the articles expand our understanding of the topic(s) of the module/week, as defined by the Article Review prompt question?
b. Are there points of agreement or disagreement between the articles? Do they approach the same theme(s) from different perspectives?
Formatting Requirements:
1. Include a title page in current Turabian format.
2. Font should be double-spaced, Times New Roman, size 12. All margins should be 1”.
3. Use current Turabian Author-Date style for all citations (no footnotes).
4. The annotated bibliography entries should be separated from each other by a single space and alphabetically organized. Synthesis paragraph(s) comes after the annotated bibliography.
5. Each review must be between 1,200–1,500 words (5–6 pages double-spaced).
6. Page numbers must be included in the upper right-hand corner.
7. Do not include an end bibliography for this assignment (your Annotated Bibliography supplies all necessary identification).
8. Refer to the Article Reviews Grading Rubric for other formatting requirements.
Perform an article review of “Why Federalism Matters” by Clarence Thomas and one other article (by either Nivola or Rubin), found in “Additional Materials” folder under “Reading & Study” in Module 2.
In your synthesis, answer the questions: Is the federalism established by the founding fathers still relevant? Why or why not, according to Thomas and Nivola/Rubin)?
Article Reviews Instructions
Reviews should cover 2 of the articles in “Additional Materials” under the “Reading and Assignments” folder for the module/week in which it is assigned.
Do not quote from the article. Instead, summarize and paraphrase in your own words.
The reviews should include:
1. Annotated Bibliography [300–400 words each; 1 entry for each source]
a. Bibliographic citation in current Turabian style.
b. Annotation: brief description/summary of the article, including identifying the research question/thesis, methodology employed, evidence or data presented, major findings, and overall strengths or weaknesses of the research.
2. Synthesis: answer the following questions to analyze both articles [750–800 words].
a. How do the articles expand our understanding of the topic(s) of the module/week, as defined by the Article Review prompt question?
b. Are there points of agreement or disagreement between the articles? Do they approach the same theme(s) from different perspectives?
Formatting Requirements:
1. Include a title page in current Turabian format.
2. Font should be double-spaced, Times New Roman, size 12. All margins should be 1”.
3. Use current Turabian Author-Date style for all citations (no footnotes).
4. The annotated bibliography entries should be separated from each other by a single space and alphabetically organized. Synthesis paragraph(s) comes after the annotated bibliography.
5. Each review must be between 1,200–1,500 words (5–6 pages double-spaced).
6. Page numbers must be included in the upper right-hand corner.
7. Do not include an end bibliography for this assignment (your Annotated Bibliography supplies all necessary identification).
8. Refer to the Article Reviews Grading Rubric for other formatting requirements.
-
48DrakeLRev231.pdf -
Article1.pdf
-
Article2.pdf
-
TheFederalistPapers44.docx
-
TheFederalistPapersNo45.docx
-
Article_Reviews_Grading_Rubric.docx
Write a short essay (1500 words) answering/covering the following questions:
- The movie points out that supermarkets are not ruled by a “free-market economy” but by a “monopsony“. What does “monopsony” mean? How is monopsony affecting farmers?
- “Farmworkers are generally paid by the piece rather than strictly by the hour” Foodchains film.com Tomato pickers in Immokalee are required to pick a minimum of 480 pounds of fruit per hour to make around $42 for a nine-hour shift; for how much money would you be willing to do this work? What else might you demand? If you would require a large amount of money to do this work, how would the company meet your demand? How would they cover the additional cost? If you say that no amount of money would be enough, what alternatives would the company have, since people like you will not do the work?
- In the film, Father Brinkle says that in the Napa Valley there is an ” Economic Apartheid.” What does he mean by that expression?
- According to the film, raising $4 million in charity in the Napa Valley does absolutely nothing to enable farmers to live a life closer in material terms to the one that donors live. Who do you think is benefiting from the Napa Valley vintners auction?
- How is the history of the agriculture industry in the U.S. connected to immigration?
Film: “Food Chains”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6vw-qTCW8fo
RESPONSE PAPER 1 INSTRUCTIONS
Response Paper: The student will write a response in 500–750 words. The paper should be double-spaced in 12 point, Times New Roman, font. The paper should address the assigned prompt.
Tips for a Response Paper:
Part I: A Brief Summary of the Sources Provided
• Identify the author and arguments of the sources provided.
• Provide a brief summary, condensing the content of the sources by highlighting the main ideas.
• Use 1-2 short quotations from the material to support your synthesis.
• Keep the summary objective and factual.
Part II: Your Reaction to the Work
• Focus on responding to the prompt.
• How are the related problems relevant to the overall class?
• How is the work related to problems in our present-day world?
• Do viewing the sources change your ideas on the topic?
• Does using a Christian worldview change the way the sources are evaluated?
Part III
• Proof-read your work. Avoid common spelling and grammar mistakes, and avoid passive voice.
• Make sure each major paragraph presents and develops a single main point.
• Organize your material.
• Cite paraphrased and quoted material.
Week 3 Prompt:
Using Reading and Study resources for Week 3, and the suggested sources below, assess how the Great Migration shaped African American churches, as millions of African Americans moved North and West out of the South, and how, in turn, these church communities influenced the culture and politics of bourgeoning urban communities.
Recommended sources include: (links are included in the Reading and Study Module 3 in Blackboard).
1. Carter Woodson, The History of the Negro Church, The Associated Publishers: Washington D.C., 1921. https://docsouth.unc.edu/church/woodson/woodson.html
Suggested reading includes Chapter XIV, “The Recent Growth of the Negro Church.”
2. African American Religious History: A Documentary Witness, Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press, 2000. https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.ezproxy.liberty.edu/lib/liberty/reader.action?docID=3007887&query=
Suggested reading includes the following excerpts from Chapter V, “From the Great Migration to World War II.” To access this, follow the link provided in blackboard, and then click on Chapter V in the table of contents.
Excerpts include:
38- “African Methodist Episcopal Council of Bishops: Address on the Great Migration”
39- “Letters on the Second Exodus: ‘Dear Mary’ and ‘My Dear Sister'”
40- “Social Work at Olivet Baptist Church”
Importantly, The company’s name chosen was HENRY FORD HOSPITAL the writer should please be mindful of that. And Please see the paper instructions for detail and the paper Rubric must be followed because that will be used to grade it. Thanks
NURS6521 week 11 Discussion: Off-Label Drug Use in Pediatrics
The unapproved use of approved drugs, also called off-label use, with children is quite common. This is because pediatric dosage guidelines are typically unavailable since very few drugs have been specifically researched and tested with children.
When treating children, prescribers often adjust dosages approved for adults to accommodate a child’s weight. However, children are not just “smaller” adults. Adults and children process and respond to drugs differently in their absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion. Children even respond differently during stages from infancy to adolescence. This poses potential safety concerns when prescribing drugs to pediatric patients. As an advanced practice nurse, you have to be aware of safety implications of the off-label use of drugs with this patient group.
To prepare:
- Review the Bazzano et al. and Mayhew articles in the Learning Resources. Reflect on situations in which children should be prescribed drugs for off-label use.
- Think about strategies to make the off-label use and dosage of drugs safer for children from infancy to adolescence. Consider specific off-label drugs that you think require extra care and attention when used in pediatrics.
With these thoughts in mind:
By Day 3
Post an explanation of circumstances under which children should be prescribed drugs for off-label use. Then, describe strategies to make the off-label use and dosage of drugs safer for children from infancy to adolescence. Include descriptions and names of off-label drugs that require extra care and attention when used in pediatrics.
By Day 6
Read a selection of your colleagues’ responses and respond to at least two of your colleagues on two different days who provided a different rationale than you did, in one or more of the following ways:
- Offer and support an alternative perspective using readings from the classroom or from your own research in the Walden Library.
- Validate an idea with your own experience and additional research.
NURS6501 week 11 Discussion: Disorders of the Reproductive Systems
While the male and female reproductive systems are unique to each sex, they share a common function—reproduction. Disorders of this system range from delayed development to structural and functional abnormalities. Since many reproductive disorders not only result in physiological consequences but also psychological consequences such as embarrassment, guilt, or profound disappointment, patients are often hesitant to seek treatment. Advanced practice nurses need to educate patients on disorders and help relieve associated stigmas. During patient evaluations, patients must feel comfortable answering questions so that you, as a key health care provider, will be able to diagnose and recommend treatment options. As you begin this Discussion, consider reproductive disorders that you would commonly see in the clinical setting.
To Prepare
- Review Chapter 22 and Chapter 23 in the McPhee and Hammer text, as well as Chapter 32 in the Huether and McCance text.
- Select two disorders of the male and/or female reproductive systems that interest you. Consider the similarities and differences between the disorders.
- Select one of the following factors: genetics, ethnicity, age, or behavior. Think about how the factor you selected might impact the diagnosis of and treatment for the reproductive disorders.
By Day 3
Post a description of the two reproductive disorders you selected, including their similarities and differences. Then explain how the factor you selected might impact the diagnosis of treatment for the reproductive disorders.
Read a selection of your colleagues’ responses.
By Day 6
Respond to at least two of your colleagues on two different days who selected different disorders or factors than you, in one or more of the following ways:
- Share insights on how the factor you selected impacts the pathophysiology of the disorder your colleague selected.
- Offer alternative diagnoses and prescription of treatment options for the disorder your colleague selected.
- Validate an idea with your own experience and additional research.
Discuss the importance of conducting a thorough literature review as it relates to the research process in two paragraphs.
Use a reference from scholarly literature : Peer-reviewed Nursing journal not older than 5 years or your textbook:
Polit, D. E. & Beck, C. T. (2018). Essentials of nursing research: Appraising evidence for nursing practice(9th. ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer.
to support your primary response.
NOLA PENDER ASSIGNMENT
Choose one health-promoting behavior in which you personally could but don’t engage. Identify factors, as defined in the health promotion model, which contribute to your decision not to participate. Include immediate competing alternatives.
2. Analyze factors that contribute to your participation in a health-promoting activity and place each factor under the appropriate label from the health promotion model.
3. Consider your own philosophy of health and prepare your description of wellness. Is absence of disease more prominent than positive, active statements of health?
4. Anticipate the health-promoting behaviors important at various stages of development across the life span. What health promotion topics do you include in your practice?
Choose one health-promoting behavior in which you personally could but don’t engage. Identify factors, as defined in the health promotion model, which contribute to your decision not to participate. Include immediate competing alternatives.
2. Analyze factors that contribute to your participation in a health-promoting activity and place each factor under the appropriate label from the health promotion model.
3. Consider your own philosophy of health and prepare your description of wellness. Is absence of disease more prominent than positive, active statements of health?
4. Anticipate the health-promoting behaviors important at various stages of development across the life span. What health promotion topics do you include in your practice?
Part 1: research paper: Frameworks that are used to manage risk within organizations and enterprises .
For your research paper, please address the following in a properly formatted research paper:
For your research paper, please address the following in a properly formatted research paper:
- Do you think that ISO 27001 standard would work well in the organization that you currently or previously have worked for? If you are currently using ISO 27001 as an ISMS framework, analyze its effectiveness as you perceive in the organization.
- Are there other frameworks mentioned has been discussed in the article that might be more effective?
- Has any other research you uncover suggest there are better frameworks to use for addressing risks?
Your paper should meet the following requirements:
- Be approximately four to six pages in length, not including the required cover page and reference page.
- Follow APA 7 guidelines. Your paper should include an introduction, a body with fully developed content, and a conclusion.
- Support your answers with the readings from the course and at least two scholarly journal articles to support your positions, claims, and observations, in addition to your textbook. The UC Library is a great place to find resources.
- Be clearly and well-written, concise, and logical, using excellent grammar and style techniques. You are being graded in part on the quality of your writing.
Part 2: Discussion (500 words including 2 responses)
From your research, discuss whether or not your organization has ISO 27001 certification. Outside of overall protection from cyber-attacks, describe, in detail, some other benefits your organization will achieve in obtaining this certification. If your company does not have this certification, how can they go about obtaining it?
Present your discussion post as if you were presenting to senior leaders of your company.
Please make your initial post and two response posts substantive. A substantive post will do at least two of the following:
- Ask an interesting, thoughtful question pertaining to the topic
- Answer a question (in detail) posted by another student or the instructor
- Provide extensive additional information on the topic
- Explain, define, or analyze the topic in detail
- Share an applicable personal experience
- Provide an outside source (for example, an article from the UC Library) that applies to the topic, along with additional information about the topic or the source (please cite properly in APA)
- Make an argument concerning the topic
Contact Us
For any questions, feedback, or comments, we have an ethical customer support team that is always waiting on the line for your inquiries.
