A Systematic Review of the Literature Examining How the Use of Electronic Devices Enhance Communication Between Patient and Provider.

Question Description

Paper title:

A Systematic Review of the Literature Examining How the Use of Electronic Devices Enhance Communication Between Patient and Provider.

I need you to read what i have of the capstone, ensure that all elements are present and add throughtout the project that the site is the Outpatient Office of Dr. Gary Millien. This project is a systematic review of literature and it has implementation must haves. Please carefully read and make sure the project flows. I am handing you the entire project with everything I have done so far, you need to put in one document and add anything that I might have missing. No additional references needed, but ensure the paper has all the intext citations.

The paper must have all of the following:

  • Introduction and Background: You will begin to explain what your change project topic is. Include background information you have obtained. Make sure to discuss the importance of your topic and why there is a need for it to be researched and implemented in your assigned facility or in advanced practice nursing in general.
  • Problem Identification and Description Using PICOT Format: Identify and describe the problem in clear and concise language. Describe the significance of the evidence-based project that can be implemented in the selected setting to the nursing profession. Give a clear and explicit statement of the problem and target population as well background of the specific problem relative to the clinic or hospital setting.
  • Critical Appraisal/Integrative Literature Review: Write a literature review using peer-reviewed articles and books, as well as non-research literature such as evidence-based guidelines, toolkits, and standardized procedures. Provide reference(s) to recent literature related to your specific unit. Identify and cite all sources of data according to APA guidelines. The goal is to review and analyze the most current research to support your project. Summarize the key findings, and provide a transition to the methods, intervention, or clinical protocol section of the paper. Describe any gaps in knowledge that you found and the effects this may have on nursing practice as it relates to your change project topic. The discussion of the literature review should be a synthesis of how each article relates to your project.
  • Project Aims, Values, and Desired Outcomes:
  • Theoretical Framework: Identify at least two independent theories or conceptual models that relate directly to the planned project in addition to the Plan Do Study Act (PDSA) cycle. Including a discussion of how each theory or model applies to the individual project is essential.
  • Proposed Evidence-Based Project Plan: Develop the project plan based on your theoretical framework and the literature review, and include an environmental assessment of the readiness for change. o Develop the strategy or strategies for meeting the desired outcomes that includes a work breakdown structure (timeline/task list/Gantt Chart)—a hierarchical definition of the tasks and activities of a project that normally begins with the highest-level activities and works downward into the individual tasks. o Include a project budget (table or spreadsheet) for the project that addresses the needed personnel, equipment, and/or supplies that may have associated costs. o Plan the design and methodology used. o Evaluation methodologies
  • Actual Outcomes/Evaluation: Measureable evaluation methods
  • Summary and Conclusions: Includes the following but is not limited to a summary of the project, a summary of main points and findings, the significance of project to the nursing profession, and any recommendations for future research.
  • References
  • Appendices

o Describe the project aim: The project aim should include examples of features and functions that will occur as a result of implementing your change project. o Describe the project value: The value should describe the benefits of the change project implementation to the stakeholders, the organization, and the nursing profession. o Describe the desired outcomes: Specifically, state the purpose, quality focus, and viewpoint of the project as well as its expected accomplishments. A project goal should reference the project’s business benefits in terms of cost, time, and/or quality that address individual and family healthcare needs or changes, results, impacts, or consequences that the project has on people, programs, or institutions. Goals and objectives should be measurable, shared, and agreed on by all key stakeholders. They are directly linked to the concept of project success factors.

(indicators/metrics) are cost savings, improved efficiencies, access to care (visits/procedures/admissions), patient/family satisfaction, associate satisfaction, associate engagement, retention, clinical outcomes, injury prevention, risk reduction, etc.

/by

Human Resource Management homework help

Analyze the case and opinion in Keith v. County of Oakland, 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 595 (6th Cir.) located in your textbook on pp. 337-342.
Write a case study review of Judge Griffin’s opinion that answers the questions below. Support your review with analysis and evidence from the unit reading and outside sources.

  • What are the legal issues presented in this case? Did the plaintiff establish a valid claim of failure to reasonably accommodate? What did the appeals court decide?
  • What accommodations was Keith requesting? Was it reasonable? Support your opinion with an argument based on the course concepts and existing legal evidence or precedents.
  • Did the county follow the interactive process required by the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)? What did they do well? What could they have done differently?

Your paper should be a minimum of two pages, not including the title and reference pages. You are required to use a minimum of three sources, one of which may be your textbook as reference material for your case study. Adhere to APA Style when constructing this assignment, including in-text citations and references for all sources that are used. Please note that no abstract is needed.

/by

>& Finance homework help

When it comes to adhering to international guidelines that go above and beyond the minimum expectations set forth in international trade and commerce agreements, you often encounter diversity in the views of the importance and feasibility of participation. This assignment is meant to help you work through potential difficulties to create a strong business case for moving an organization forward in proactively addressing compliance to international guidelines for manufacturing, employee treatment, and general business principles. Review the scenario and respond to the questions that follow:
Imagine yourself as the CEO or a high-level executive for an international corporation. A board member brings the UNGC, UNPRI, or ISO27000 (apply to the use of technology) standards and principles to your attention and stresses the importance of adherence to all the principles contained within the guidelines. When you take this mandate to the executive leadership team, their first reaction is that it is too costly and presents more of an ideal rather than what is possible for your company in the real world.
Who in management should respond? What is the case for compliance? How do you create a business case for adhering to these guidelines?
How do you bring the board and management together? What should the strategy be?
/by

Marketing homework help

Group Company Project – Part II
The purpose of the second part of the comprehensive project is to compute financial statement ratios. Based on the company you selected in Part I, complete the following:

  1. Based on formulas in your textbook, compute the following ratios for two years. You may use Excel to compute your ratios.
    1. Debt ratio
    2. Gross profit margin
    3. Free cash flow
    4. Times interest earned
    5. Accounts receivable turnover
    6. Inventory turnover
  2. Prepare a DuPont Analysis of ROE for two years, including computations of
    1. Return on Sales
    2. Asset Turnover
    3. Return on Assets
    4. Financial Leverage
    5. Return on Equity

 

  1. Briefly evaluate the ratio trends. Indicate on your worksheet whether each ratio is:
    1. stronger / weaker
    2. quicker /slower
    3. more / less liquid
    4. more / less risk
  2. Write a 3-6 page report evaluating trends in all of the above ratios. Discuss whether your company’s profitability, efficiency, liquidity, and solvency are improving or deteriorating. Suggest ways the company can improve the ratios that show problems. The report should be well written with cover page, introduction, the body of the paper (with appropriate subheadings), conclusion, and reference page. References must be appropriately cited.

 
 
 
 
 
 
Submit Group Project Part III (Read Instructions):
Important: Turnitin is active. Turnitin score greater than 25% will be investigated. In addition, you may lose points if your Turnitin score is greater than 25%. 
Group Company Project Part III
The purpose of the third part of the comprehensive project is to use resources available to obtain industry averages for commonly used ratios. Additionally, you will compare company ratio results to industry averages.

  1. Obtain the four-digit primary SIC (Standard Industrial Classification) Code and industry title for your company. Record the primary SIC code and industry title at the top of the Ratio Analysis Worksheet.
  2. Obtain industry averages for commonly used ratios in the current period. Industry average information is reported by industry title or SIC code.
  3. Look up the following industry-average ratios:
    1. Current ratio
    2. Debt ratio
    3. Gross profit margin
    4. Times interest earned
    5. Accounts receivable turnover
    6. Inventory turnover
    7. Return on Sales
    8. Asset Turnover
    9. Return on Assets
    10. Financial Leverage
    11. Return on Equity

Note that some industry averages may not apply to your company.
Alternative to Industry Averages:
If you are not able to find the industry average for part 3 of your project, please consider the following:
Unfortunately, some of the websites where you can find industry averages will require you to pay for them. Instead of using industry average, calculate the same ratios for one of the competitors to the company you used in your project. That will give you the comparative information you need for Part 3 of the project. I believe this will help.

  1. Write a 3-5 page report comparing the above ratios to industry averages. Discuss whether your company’s profitability, efficiency, liquidity, and solvency are better than, or worse than, its peers. The report should be well written with cover page, introduction, body of paper (with appropriate subheadings), conclusion, and reference page. References must be appropriately cited. Format: Double-spaced, one-inch margins, using a 12-point Times New Roman font.

Group Project Part IV (Read Instructions)

Important: Turnitin is active. Turnitin score greater than 25% will be investigated. In addition, you may lose points if your Turnitin score is greater than 25%. 


Group Company Project Part IV: Final Written Paper
The final written paper requires you to prepare a well-written titled “Would You Advise a Friend to Invest in This Company?” based upon your research and analysis of this company’s financial information. You should identify at least 5-7 significant points that justify your conclusion. Support your points with a comprehensive explanation incorporating sound reasoning. The significant points you identified should be consistent with what you said in Parts I, II, and III.
Your final written paper should be 4-5 pages long. The report should be well written with cover page, introduction, the body of the paper (with appropriate subheadings), conclusion, and reference page. References must be appropriately cited. Format: Double-spaced, one-inch margins, using a 12-point Times New Roman font.

/by

Nursing homework help

Death With Dignity Scenario and Reflection
To complete each scenario assignment:
Complete the entire scenario.
Compose your reflection in a Word document and be sure to address, at a minimum, the following questions:
Why do you feel the way you do about the issue presented?
Of the four responses offered in the scenario, which do you feel is the most ethical and why?
Support your conclusions with evidence and specific examples from the textbook, as well as other sources as needed.
Your reflection must be 1-2 pages in length and follow APA formatting and citation guidelines as appropriate.
Need Turnitin report to ensure that no plagiarism.
  • attachment

    DeathwithDignityscenarioconversation.docx
/by

Managerial Accounting

 

/by

Accounting homework help

The Case Requirements
From the time that Loxon became GLS’s auditor, there were several audit deficiencies. Please identify and describe the key audit deficiencies that led to GLS’s persistent financial statement fraud.
Requirement 2
Section 10A of the SEC Act of 1934 requires auditors to report to the SEC when, during an audit, an auditor detects: 1) illegal acts which have a material impact on the financial statements, and 2) appropriate action is not taken by management and the board of directors. Loxon had responsibilities to GLS, but also to other stakeholders, such as the SEC, the PRC, and investors. Do you believe that Loxon fulfilled their responsibilities to each of the four stakeholders mentioned?
Requirement 3
The PCAOB and SEC coordinate their efforts to ensure public firms’ compliance with their rules and regulations and to protect investors. Section 106 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 requires that auditors of a U.S. issuer registered with the PCAOB consent to produce workpapers when requested by either the SEC or the PCAOB. Among the common investigations by the PCAOB is the failure to cooperate with an inspection or investigation. Likewise, Rule 102(e) of the SEC “Improper Professional Conduct” gives the SEC the power to sanction auditors if there is professional misconduct.

  1. a)  What are the steps of conducting an inspection by the PCAOB?
  2. b)  What are the implications of violating the PCAOB inspections rules (types of sanctions) and
    discovery of audit deficiencies on Loxon?

11
c) Under SEC – Rule 102(e), what are the implications to Loxon for improper professional conduct?
Requirement 4
In 2017, the PCAOB issued a new auditing standard to replace a portion of AS 3101 “The Auditor’s Report on an Audit of Financial Statements When the Auditor Expresses an Unqualified Opinion” and extended it with AS 3105 “Departures from Unqualified Opinions and Other Reporting Circumstances”. The purpose of the new standards is to expand auditor reporting and enhance its relevance to investors. AS 3101 is effective for audits of fiscal years ending on or after June 30, 2019 for large accelerated filers and on December 15, 2020 for all other firms. Please review the final ruling of the AS 3101 using this link “https://pcaobus.org/Rulemaking/Docket034/2017-001- auditors-report-final-rule.pdf” and answer the following questions:

  1. a)  Summarize the improvements in the expanded auditor report.
  2. b)  Define Critical Audit Matters (CAMs) and give examples from the present case.
  3. c)  Assume that Loxon had provided its last auditor report prior to resigning. Given the
    circumstances of this case, prepare Loxon’s last audit report in accordance with the new audit report standard AS 3105: Departures from Unqualified Opinions and Other Reporting Circumstances. You may refer to an example of auditor’s report that you can access through the PCAOB website by following this link:https://pcaobus.org/Standards/Auditing/Pages/AS3105.aspx
  4. d)  What are the implications of this new standard on the case study?

Requirement 5
Culture can be defined as: “the collective programming of the mind that distinguishes the members of one group or category of people from another” (Hofstede, 2001, p.9). According to Geert
page12image40737536 page12image40732736 page12image40744256
12
Hofstede’s cultural model, societal values are affected by ecological values and influenced by external forces (trade and investment), and hence affect the business environment.

  1. a)  Describe the likely effects of the 6-D model of Geert Hofstede’s cultural dimensions on the
    development of financial reporting systems within the United States versus China. The link to the 6-D model of national culture by Geert Hofstede is shown below: https://geerthofstede.com/culture-geert-hofstede-gert-jan-hofstede/6d-model-of-national- culture/
  2. b)  Why are the financial statements in China considered State-sensitive information, while in the U.S. they are public information?
  3. c)  Countries all over the world are categorized by their regulatory and political systems, emerging as either common law countries, code law countries or mixed systems. Please describe the regulatory and political systems of the United States versus China.

Requirement 6

  1. a)  What are the most significant implication(s) of China’s State Secrecy Laws regarding the audit procedures and audit liability?
  2. b)  Do you think that Loxon was justified in their initial reluctance to provide the workpapers to the SEC?
  3. c)  Was the SEC justified in their reaction? Please support your answers.
  4. d)  Roger Silvers is an accounting professor at the University of Utah and had served as a visiting economist with the SEC. Professor Silvers recently wrote a comment letter to the SEC that includes recommendations for the SEC to follow in an effort to reduce the risks that investors face when investing abroad. The Comment Letter can be accessed via this link: https://www.sec.gov/comments/emerging-markets/cll9-7328594-218510.pdf. Please

page13image40577152 page13image40577344
13
read the letter and explain which course(s) of action would be most effective in reducing risk when investing abroad.

  • attachment

    ThePRCAuditingCase.pdf
/by

PICOT Question And Literature Search

The first step of the evidence‐based practice process is to evaluate a nursing practice environment to identify a nursing problem in the clinical area. When a nursing problem is discovered, the nurse researcher develops a clinical guiding question to address that nursing practice problem.

For this assignment, you will create a clinical guiding question know as a PICOT question. The PICOT question must be relevant to a nursing practice problem. To support your PICOT question, identify six supporting peer‐revised research articles, as indicated below. The PICOT question and six peer‐reviewed research articles you choose will be utilized for subsequent assignments.

Use the “Literature Evaluation Table” to complete this assignment.

  1. Select a nursing practice problem of interest to use as the focus of your research (use hypertension as a topic/problem). Start with the patient population and identify a clinical problem or issue that arises from the patient population. In 200–250 words, provide a summary of the clinical issue.
  2. Following the PICOT format, write a PICOT question in your selected nursing practice problem area of interest. The PICOT question should be applicable to your proposed capstone project (the project students must complete during their final course in the RN‐BSN program of study).
  3. The PICOT question will provide a framework for your capstone project. 
  4. Conduct a literature search to locate six research articles focused on your selected nursing practice problem of interest. This literature search should include three quantitative and three qualitative peer‐reviewed research articles to support your nursing practice problem.
/by

>Anatomy homework help

BIOL 2263e Human Anatomy & Physiology Lab II
Respiration
Lung Capacity Lab 23 points
Measuring Tidal Volume
A. (1 pt) IN YOUR OWN WORDS describe or define Tidal Volume.
Method
1. Prepare the spirometer according to Spirometer Instructions (found in Content).
Also read: Laboratory Procedures for Primate Osteometrics
2. Sit near spirometer setup, breathing quietly for 2 minutes
3. Place the tubing mouthpiece between lips, inhale in a normal, unforced way, pinch the nose closed with your fingers, and exhale in a normal, unforced way, into the tube.
4. Calculate the displaced water volume (original volume – remaining volume).
5. Record the displaced volume in the space to the right of Trial 1.
6. (3 pt) Refill the jug and Repeat twice more (for total of three readings).
 
Trial
Tidal   Volume
 
1
 
2
 
3
 
Total
Expected/Normal   Value
 
Average   (total /3)
B. (1 pt) Briefly compare the subject’s Tidal Volume to expected / normal Tidal Volume
Measuring Expiratory Reserve Volume
A. (1 pt) IN YOUR OWN WORDS describe or define Expiratory Reserve Volume.
Method
1. Prepare the spirometer according to Spirometer Instructions.
2. Sit near spirometer setup, breathing quietly for 2 minutes.
3. Place the tubing between lips, plug the nose and take a normal breath or two through the mouth. After a normal exhalation, exhale all additional air possible into the tube.
4. Calculate the displaced water volume (original volume – remaining volume).
5. Record the displaced volume in the space to the right of Trial 1.
6. (3 pt) Refill jug the jug and repeat twice more (for total of three readings)
 
Trial
Expiratory   Reserve Volume
 
1
 
2
 
3
 
Total
Expected/Normal   Value
 
Average   (total /3)
B. (1 pt) Briefly compare the subject’s Tidal Volume to expected / normal Expiratory Reserve volume
Measuring Inspiratory Reserve Volume
A. (1 pt) IN YOUR OWN WORDS describe or define Inspiratory Reserve Volume.
Method
1. Set up the spirometer for use.
2. Sit near spirometer setup, breathing quietly for 2 minutes.
3. Breathe in as deeply as possible, place tube between lips and exhale normally (without force)
4. Calculate the displaced water volume (original volume – remaining volume).
5. Subtract your AVERAGE tidal volume (from first Table) from the displaced volume to find the Inspiratory Reserve volume.
6. (3 pt) Record the calculated volume; refill the jug and repeat twice more (for total of three readings)
 
Trial
Inspiratory   Reserve Volume
 
1
 
2
 
3
 
Total
Expected/Normal   Value
 
Average   (Total/3)
B. (1 pt) Briefly compare the subject’s Inspiratory Reserve Volume to expected / normal Inspiratory Reserve value
Measuring Vital Capacity
A. (1 pt) IN YOUR OWN WORDS describe or define Vital Capacity.
Method
1. Set up the spirometer for use.
2. Subject stands near spirometer breathing slowly and deeply for a while
3. Breathe in as deeply as possible
4. Place the tube between lips and breathe out as forcibly as possible
5. (6 pts) Calculate and record the displaced volume (original volume – remaining volume); repeat twice more.
 
Vital   Capacity
 
Trial
Measured Vital Capacity
Calculated Vital Capacity*
 
1
 
2
 
3
 
Total
Expected/Normal   Value
 
Average   (total /3)
*Vital Capacity measurements can be checked by comparing to the sum of:
Tidal Volume + Expiratory Reserve Volume + Inspiratory Reserve Volume
B. (1 pt) Briefly compare the subject’s Vital Capacity to expected / normal Vital Capacity
/by

Compare and contrast qualitative and quantitative research designs.

Below are two articles for the final paper; one quantitative and one qualitative.  Select either the quantitative or the qualitative article and utilize the American Nurses Association Framework for How to Read and Critique a Research Study found below.

Moore, J., Prentice, D., & McQuestion, M. (2015). Social interaction and collaboration among oncology nurses. Nursing Research and Practice, 2015(Article ID 248067), 1-7. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/248067

Walker, R., Huxley, L., Juttner, M., Burmeister, E., Scott, J., & Aitken, L. M. (2016, February 12). A pilot randomized controlled trial using prophylactic dressings to minimize sacral pressure injuries in high-risk hospitalized patients. Clinical Nursing Research: An International Journal. 1-20. doi: 10.1177/1054773816629689

Assignment Criteria:

For this assignment, develop a scholarly paper that addresses the following criteria:

  1. Compare and contrast qualitative and quantitative research designs.
  2. Critique the selected article using section one (1), a-n of the ANA Framework for How to Read and Critique a Research Study posted in the Weekly Guide/Week 7-SEE ATTACHED
  3. Provide rationale for the responses to the questions supporting the conclusions about the chosen article.
  4. Include level 1 and 2 headings to organize the paper.
  5. Include an introductory paragraph, purpose statement, supporting paragraphs, a conclusion, and a reference page.
  6. Write the paper in third person, not first person (meaning do not use ‘we’ or ‘I’).
  7. The scholarly paper should be five to six pages excluding the title and reference pages.
  8. Include a minimum of five (5) references from professional peer-reviewed nursing journals to support the paper. One reference may be the textbook. References should be from scholarly peer-reviewed journals (review in Ulrich Periodical Directory) and be less than five (5) years old.
  1. APA format is required (attention to spelling/grammar, a title page, introductory paragraph, purpose statement a reference page, and in-text citations).
/by