Translation of a research-based intervention to practice involves a critical review of numerous published research studies to discern if individuals – research subjects – were treated according to the ethical values and principles as defined by the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR). Reflect upon your selected practice problem and the eventual research-based intervention you select for your practice change project and address the following. (OBESITY)
1-What are the potential benefits and harms related to your selected practice problem when considering a research-based intervention for your practice change project?
2-Are there competing personal or professional values related to this research-based intervention that might impact the implementation of this intervention in your practice setting?
3-What types of objections might be raised? How will you explain your decision to key stakeholders to address these objections?
Please answer these questions separated and use at least 3 sources no later than 5 years.
You can use this sources:
Resnik, D. B. (2015, May). Glossary of commonly used terms in research ethics. Retrieved from National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences website: https://www.niehs.nih.gov/research/resources/bioethics/glossary/index.cfm
· Resnik, D. B. (2018, July). Research ethics timeline (1932–Present). Retrieved from National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences website: https://www.niehs.nih.gov/research/resources/bioethics/timeline/index.cfm (Links to an external site.)
https://courseworkgeeks.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/LOGO.png00adminhttps://courseworkgeeks.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/LOGO.pngadmin2025-09-28 16:35:442025-09-28 16:35:44Nursing homework help
see attachments I have complete a portion of the assignment but need the rest of the
The purpose of this assignment is to provide you the opportunity to expand the scope of your clinical documentation and your thought processes relative to complex patient care cases.
1. Select a patient encounter from your current clinical experience.
2. The patient encounter you select should be one of the more complex patient cases that you have experienced with your current clinical patient population. Given that you are to select complex cases, this assignment may not be completed for a ‘general health, well child, well woman, routine OB, routine physical exam (etc.)’ type of encounter.
You will need to identify which patient encounter you are expanding your documentation for by including the Typhon Case ID # under your name on the title page of your paper.
3. For this assignment you will utilize the same SOAP format that you do for your ‘expanded’ Typhon encounters. Construct this assignment ensuring that you adhere to the writing guidelines provided in the 6th edition APA manual.
Below is the overview of the required elements for this assignment:
*Title Page (Page 1): Follow APA guidelines for running head on page 1, and include Medical Diagnosis, Student Name, Typhon Case ID #, and Date.
*Subjective (Start of Page 2): Follow APA guidelines for running head on page 2 and subsequent pages.
CC: chief complaint – What are they being seen for? This is the reason that the patient sought care, stated in their own words, or paraphrased.
HPI: history of present illness – use the “OLDCART” approach for collecting data and documenting findings. [O=onset, L=location, D=duration, C=characteristics, A=associated/aggravating factors, R=relieving Factors, T=treatment, S=summary]
PMH: past medical history – This should include past illness/diagnosis, conditions, traumas, hospitalizations, and surgical history. Include dates if possible.
Allergies: State the offending medication/food and the reactions.
Medications: Names, dosages, and routes of administration.
Social history: Related to the problem, educational level/literacy, smoking, alcohol, drugs, HIV risk, sexually active, caffeine, work and other stressors. Cultural and spiritual beliefs that impact health and illness. Financial resources.
Click on the link below to explore the CDC’s information on the ‘social determinants of health’.
https://www.cdc.gov/socialdeterminants/
Family history: Use terms like maternal, paternal and the diseases and the ages they were deceased or diagnosed if known.
Health Maintenance/Promotion: Immunizations, exercise, diet, etc. Remember to use the United States Clinical Preventative Services Task Force (USPSTF) guidelines for age appropriate indicators. This should reflect what the patient is presently doing regarding the guidelines.
Click on the link below to access information about current guidelines.
https://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/
Review of Systems (ROS): this is to make sure you have not missed any important symptoms, particularly in areas that you have not already thoroughly explored while discussing the history of present illness. You would also want to include any pertinent negatives or positives that would help with your differential diagnosis. For acute episodic (focused) visits (i.e. sprained ankle, sore throat, etc.) you may be omitting certain areas such as GYN, Rectal, GI/Abd, etc. While the list below is provided for your convenience it is not to be considered all-encompassing and you are expected to include other systems/categories applicable to your patient’s chief complaint.
General: May include if patient has had a fever, chills, fatigue, malaise, etc.
Skin:
HEENT: head, eyes, ears, nose and throat
Neck:
CV: cardiovascular
Lungs:
GI: gastrointestinal
GU: genito-urinary
PV: peripheral vascular
MSK: musculoskeletal
Neuro: neurological
Endo: endocrine
Psych:
*Objective:
Physical Examination (PE): either limited for a focused exam or more extensive for a complete history and physical assessment. This area should confirm your findings related to the diagnosis. For acute episodic (focused) visits (i.e. sprained ankle, sore throat, etc.) you may be omitting certain areas such as GYN, Rectal, Abd, etc. All SOAP notes however should have physical examination of CV and lungs. While the list below is provided for your convenience it is not to be considered all-encompassing and you are expected to include other systems/assessments applicable to your patient’s chief complaint. Ensure that you include appropriate male and female specific physical assessments when applicable to the encounter. Your physical exam information should be organized using the same body system format as the ROS section. Appropriate medical terminology describing the objective examination is mandatory.
VS: vital signs, height and weight, BMI
Gen: general statement of appearance, if there is any acute distress.
Skin:
HEENT: head, eyes, ears, nose and throat
Neck:
CV: cardiovascular
Lungs:
Abd: abdomen
GU: genito-urinary
PV: peripheral vascular
MSK: musculoskeletal
Neuro: neurological exam
Psych:
Diagnostic Tests: This area is for tests that were completed during the patient’s appointment that ruled the differential diagnosis in or out (e.g. – Rapid Strep Test, CXR, etc.).
*Assessment: (number each diagnosis)
Diagnosis/Diagnoses: Start with the presenting chief complaint diagnosis first. Number each diagnosis. A statement of current condition of all other chronic illnesses that were addressed during the visit must be included (i.e. HTN-well managed on medication). Remember the S and O must support this diagnosis. Pertinent positives and negatives must be found in the write-up.
*Plan: (number each plan specific to each diagnosis)
These are the interventions that relate to the above diagnosis and address the following aspects (they should be separated out as listed below):
Diagnostics: labs, diagnostics testing – tests that you planned for/ordered during the encounter that you plan to review/evaluate relative to your work up for the patient’s chief complaint.
Therapeutic: changes in meds, skin care, counseling
Educational: information clients need in order to address their health problems. Include follow-up care. Anticipatory guidance and counseling.
Consultation/Collaboration: referrals, or consult while in clinic with another provider. If no referral made was there a possible referral you could make and why? Advance care planning.
*Clinical Decision Making
The next section summarizes your critical thinking, decision-making and diagnostic reasoning skills that provides you the platform to expand on your identified Typhon patient encounter. It is a reflection of the thought process you used in caring for the patient. Follow the directions under each section and label each area as appropriate. All information should be in your own words.
Pathophysiology:
Include information in regard to the pathophysiology related to the main diagnosis or illness process. This will help to understand how the S and O supported the diagnosis you assigned.
Do not copy and paste from credible sources. Paraphrase source information as you construct your discussion of the pathophysiology and ensure that you provide in-text and reference citations for the source.
Pharmacology: OR (***Alternate – Therapy information):
Choose one drug that was prescribed at this visit or that is taken chronically by the patient to review. Please include the name of the drug (generic and brand), class, action, excretion, side effects and interactions, why this particular drug is being prescribed for this particular patient, what is this drug intended to treat, (specifically antibiotics, what organisms are we treating?). What other drug could be chosen instead that would work, if any? Keep in mind the cost and convenience for the patient.
***NOTE: Since the patient encounter you select for this assignment is supposed to be one of the most complex encounters you have with this course population, the likelihood exists that you will have a pharmacologic agent to discuss for this assignment requirement. However, if there are no pharmacologic agents to utilize then choose a non-pharmacologic element of the therapeutic plan (e.g. this could be hyperbaric therapy, water therapy, relaxation training, biofeedback, PT, OT, Counseling [e. g. nutritional, emotional, behavior modification, etc.]or a Complementary Alternative Medical regimen [e.g. nutritional therapy, a spiritual intervention, Emotional Freedom Therapy (EFT), journaling, visual imagery, progressive relaxation, Cranial Electrical Stimulation (CES), etc.]
Do not copy and paste from credible sources. Paraphrase source information as you construct your discussion and ensure that you provide in-text and reference citations for the source.
Clinical Diagnostic Reasoning:
Include in this section:
1.Differential diagnoses
Include a list of all of the diagnoses you considered for your list of ‘differential diagnoses. This list may extend beyond the diagnoses identified in the ‘A’ section of the paper.
2.Priority diagnosis discussion
Discuss the key assessment [history and physical exam] findings that resulted in the identification of the priority diagnosis/diagnoses indicated in the ‘A’ section of the paper
3.Rationale for key elements of the plan of care
As an advanced practice student you need to explore the evidence relative to the patient’s care needs and be able to document the rationale for the elements of the plan.
Briefly provide rationales for the key elements of the plan of care [e.g. if a particular HTN medication is prescribed then reference the current JNC guidelines, if a particular antimicrobial is prescribed provide the source referenced for the decision, etc.]
Provide a rationale for any care aspect included in the plan that is not consistent with the care approaches found in your course materials, EBP, CPGs or encompassed in the ‘community standard of care’.
When using credible sources to support your discussion do not copy and paste from the sources. Paraphrase source information as you construct your discussion and ensure that you provide in-text and reference citations for the source.
Ethical and or Cultural Concerns:
Identify any ethical or cultural issues related to this patient’s care. Include how these concerns were addressed.
Discuss the following:
1.Review the provisions of the ANA Code of Ethics
Choose at least one of the provisions of the Code and discuss how your experience with the patient encounter aligns with the tenants of the provision OR how you advocated for the patient during the encounter to ensure your actions aligned with the tenants of the provision.
Link to gain access to the ANA Code of Ethics – you will need to scroll down to ‘Select One’ [option] to progress to the page where you will have full access to the Code:
Construct a discussion that summarizes the barriers/potential barriers your patient faces relative to their ability to seek or receive healthcare services and exploration of at least 3 of the applicable ‘social determinants of health’ for your patient.
Discuss the Following:
1.The actual and potential barriers you identified for your patient
Your discussion needs to include observations about access to care, financial barriers, and non-financial barriers beyond access. Be sure to provide in-text citations as appropriate for APA style guidelines in your discussion to support the literature that you reviewed in identifying the actual/potential barriers.
2.Three priority social determinants of health for your patient
Your discussion needs to include exploration of the three social determinants of health that you identified as having the most significant impact on your patient’s health care and health status. Be sure to provide in-text citations as appropriate for APA style guidelines in your discussion to support the literature that you reviewed in identifying the social determinants of health.
Link to CDC’s information on Social Determinants of Health
https://www.cdc.gov/socialdeterminants/
3.Health care policy or advocacy initiatives relevant to your patient’s care
Include in your discussion at least one health care policy or initiative that you identified in the literature as having the potential to positively impact the identified actual/potential barriers or priority social determinants of health for your patient.
Resources for your ‘search’ include the Herzing Library, Google Scholar, PubMed, and/or the Virginia Henderson Repository https://www.nursingrepository.org/
*Evidence based practice:
Evidence-Based Practice (EBP) is a thoughtful integration of the best available evidence, coupled with clinical expertise. As such it enables health practitioners to address healthcare questions with an evaluative and qualitative approach. EBP allows the practitioner to assess current and past research, clinical guidelines, and other information resources in order to identify relevant literature while differentiating between high-quality and low-quality findings. Evidence-Based Practice includes the application of evidence and the evaluation of the outcomes to guide future practice.
This section is a 1-2 paragraph summary of all the scholarly evidence utilized to complete this assignment. New resources, topics or ideas should not be introduced.
Discuss the following:
1.Formulate a well-built question.
What clinical questions and terms did you use to direct your search in the library database?
2. Identify articles and other evidence-based resources that answer the question. Identify all sources (APA citations) used that informed your decision making in this particular case.
3. Critically appraise the evidence [research study, evidence based or clinical practice guidelines, published care standards, etc.] to assess its validity. Comment on the quality of the research or evidence based practice guidelines used. What is the level of evidence? How credible is it? Is it a just a recommendation or an expected standard of care?
4. Apply the evidence and evaluate for areas of improvement. How valuable was the evidence in understanding and directing the care in this case? How did it influence your decision making? Were you able to assess the outcome? If so, are changes needed?
*Self-Reflection:
Reflection on decision making: This is an area where you look over the data gathered and after a careful review of the available resources (i.e. text books, reference readings) will provide a reflection of what might have been added or deleted that would have made this note more conclusive or complete. This is not an area to critique the preceptor. Discuss areas could you have changed? What areas might you have added, perhaps additional questions you should have asked in the ROS, or additional areas you may have assessed for in the PE?
Advanced Practice Practitioner Role Analysis: Identify the specific person that drove this plan of care and developed the management, while including detail in how you advocated for the patient. It is entirely possible, and desirable, that you drove the development of the plan of care. Include how an individualized approach was applied to this patient’s care. Also include how you identified your advocacy for the role of the Nurse Practitioner.
*Reference Page: Follow APA guidelines for constructing all reference page citations and ensure you used APA style for all in-text citations.
https://courseworkgeeks.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/LOGO.png00adminhttps://courseworkgeeks.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/LOGO.pngadmin2025-09-28 16:29:482025-09-28 16:29:48Diagnostic and Clinical Reasoning Paper Assignment
The aim of this assignment is to critically evaluate a journal article. This will provide you with the skills and knowledge to be able to evaluate the quality and relevance of research so that you can make informed decisions about applying it to practice.
This assignment addresses the following course learning outcomes:
1. Examine the contribution of research to evidence-based practice;
2. Evaluate the credibility of the information provided by research studies;
3. Demonstrate understanding of the major elements of the research process that underpin translation to practice.
https://courseworkgeeks.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/LOGO.png00adminhttps://courseworkgeeks.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/LOGO.pngadmin2025-09-28 16:27:492025-09-28 16:27:49The aim of this assignment is to critically evaluate a journal article. This will provide you with the skills and knowledge to be able to evaluate the quality and relevance of research so that you can make informed decisions about applying it to practice.
NO PLAGIARISM
100-200 words per question
please use 3 references min
All in a Day’s Work Case Study
Review the All in a Day’s Work Case Study (pp. 33-34) and answer the three discussion questions. Responses to each question should range from 100-200 words. Your paper should reflect scholarly writing and current APA standards (12 point Times New Roman font, double-spacing, 1″ margins, title and reference pages). Be sure to use the text and/or other sources to support your responses and properly cite the use of such.
1. Describe the people-related problems or issues Ann Wood faced during the day. Did she handle these effectively? If not, what do you believe she should have done?
2. Is Ann Wood a high-involvement manager? If so, provide evidence. If not, how well do you think she’ll perform in her new job as head of marketing?
3. Assume that Ann Wood wants her managers and associates to be the foundation for her department’s competitive advantages. Use the framework summarized in Exhibit 1.2 to assess the degree to which Ann’s people are a source of competitive advantage at this point in time.
Video Paper Requirements 40 points (select ONE movie and answer all the questions and other information you research to support your answers) The paper must be in APA format. Personality Disorders
Select one of the following movies and answer the discussion questions that
follow in APA format report.
Girl Interrupted (1999 Drama; Angelina Jolie, Winona Ryder,
Whoopie Goldberg)
Fatal Attraction (1987 Thriller/Drama; Glenn Close, Michael
Douglas)
Natural Born Killers (1994 Thriller/Drama; Woody Harrelson,
Juliette Lewis)
American Psycho (1999 Drama/Suspense; Christian Bale)
Must answer the following questions in your APA formatted paper.
Identify the character and the psychological disorder they display.
Did the movie accurately portray the symptoms of the disorder? Was this an accurate clinical picture? Explain in detail and provide examples from the movie.
Discuss any inaccuracies and misconceptions perpetrated of the disorder in the Movie. If the disorder was misrepresented explain how this could be misleading to a typical movie-goer?
How is a personality disorder different from an Axis 1 disorder?
Dissociative Disorders
Primal Fear (1996 Drama/Suspense; Richard Gere, Edward Norton)
Me, Myself and Irene (2000 Comedy; Jim Carey, Renee Zellweger)
Identity (2003 Thriller; John Cusack, Ray Liotta, Amanda Peete)
Fight Club (1999 Action/Drama; Brad Pitt, Edward Norton)
Secret window (2004 Thriller; Johnny Depp, John Turturro)
Identify the character and the psychological disorder they display.
Did the movie accurately portray the symptoms of the disorder? Was this an accurate clinical picture? Explain in detail and provide examples from the movie.
Discuss any inaccuracies and misconceptions perpetrated of the disorder in the movie. If the disorder was misrepresented explain how this could be misleading to a typical movie-goer. Many reputable theorists believe DID does not exist. What do you think? Support your thoughts.
https://courseworkgeeks.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/LOGO.png00adminhttps://courseworkgeeks.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/LOGO.pngadmin2025-09-28 16:01:192025-09-28 16:01:19Psychology homework help
Apa format
1-2 paragraphs
references
We have all worked in a group or team at some point in our careers. A team is brought together to achieve a common goal. The team needs to have members who have complementary skills and who are committed to a common purpose to achieve performance goals. However, teams don’t move immediately toward performing, but instead evolve over time. There are five stages of group and team development:
Forming: Getting oriented and getting acquainted. High degree of uncertainty as members as they try to figure out who is in charge.
Storming: Personalities start to emerge, along with roles and conflicts within the group.
Norming: In the third stage conflicts are resolved, relationships developed, harmony and unity surfaces.
Performing: The members concentrate on solving problems and completing the assigned task.
Adjourning: Members prepare to disband. Some members may be reassigned, terminated from the group or the group is resolved.
Think about a time when you joined a new group—it could be at work, in a family setting or with a social group.
Advanced practice nurses often treat patients with vein and artery disorders such as chronic venous insufficiency (CVI) and deep venous thrombosis (DVT). While the symptoms of both disorders are noticeable, these symptoms are sometimes mistaken for signs of other conditions, making the disorders difficult to diagnose. Nurses must examine all symptoms and rule out other potential disorders before diagnosing and prescribing treatment for patients. In this Assignment, you explore the epidemiology, pathophysiology, and clinical presentation of CVI and DVT.
To Prepare
Review the section “Diseases of the Veins” (pp. 598-599) in Chapter 23 of the Huether and McCance text. Identify the pathophysiology of chronic venous insufficiency and deep venous thrombosis. Consider the similarities and differences between these disorders.
Select a patient factor different from the one you selected in this week’s Discussion: genetics, gender, ethnicity, age, or behavior. Think about how the factor you selected might impact the pathophysiology of CVI and DVT. Reflect on how you would diagnose and prescribe treatment of these disorders for a patient based on the factor you selected.
Review the “Mind Maps—Dementia, Endocarditis, and Gastro-oesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD)” media in the Week 2 Learning Resources. Use the examples in the media as a guide to construct two mind maps—one for chronic venous insufficiency and one for venous thrombosis. Consider the epidemiology and clinical presentation of both chronic venous insufficiency and deep venous thrombosis.
To Complete
APA format, Write a 2–page paper that addresses the following:
Compare the pathophysiology of chronic venous insufficiency and deep venous thrombosis. Describe how venous thrombosis is different from arterial thrombosis.
Explain how the patient factor you selected might impact the pathophysiology of CVI and DVT. Describe how you would diagnose and prescribe treatment of these disorders for a patient based on the factor you selected.
Construct two mind maps—one for chronic venous insufficiency and one for deep venous thrombosis. Include the epidemiology, pathophysiology, and clinical presentation, as well as the diagnosis and treatment you explained in your paper.
BY DAY 7
The Assignment is due.
Note: The School of Nursing requires that all papers submitted include a title page, introduction, summary, and references. The Sample Paper provided at the Walden Writing Center provides an example of those required elements (available at http://writingcenter.waldenu.edu/57.htm). All papers submitted must use this formatting.
From the Plagiarism Tools area, click the checkbox for I agree to submit my paper(s) to the Global Reference Database.
https://courseworkgeeks.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/LOGO.png00adminhttps://courseworkgeeks.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/LOGO.pngadmin2025-09-28 15:43:532025-09-28 15:43:53Disorders of the Veins and Arteries
Create a 2 page word document that utilizes the planning, monitoring and evaluation stages of Self Regulated Learners.
The planning and monitoring stages will be for Unit 3, while the evaluation stage will relate back to your performance on any and all assessments of Unit 2.
Answer the questions below for each of the stages. You are welcome to create an actual schedule for the lessons of the unit.
Planning stage
For each lesson of the Unit, how much time will you dedicate? Be specific in the total amount of time for that lesson, the length of each study period, and the number of days studying prior to the resulting quiz.
What study strategies will you use?
How will you avoid distractions?
Monitoring Stage
Present 3 situations or items that you must do to ensure that you have quality study time.
Where are you studying? Will you be able to move or go elsewhere if there are distractions?
Evaluation Stage (of the previous Unit)
How did you perform on each of the Unit quizzes?
What could you improve if you are disappointed in your grade?
What practice will you continue if you did well on your quizzes?
https://courseworkgeeks.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/LOGO.png00adminhttps://courseworkgeeks.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/LOGO.pngadmin2025-09-28 15:38:422025-09-28 15:38:42Psychology homework help
Before you begin, read the sources listed for Monday in Week 13 Readings. These readings are meant to give us an introduction to some of the common arguments around maps and mapping today. Part 1: Understanding
Answer the following questions, citing both Nedra Reynolds and one other source in each of your answers. Note that all of these concepts are repeated multiple times in the readings, so you can synthesize from different areas of the reading. I’m leaving the questions broad to facilitate connections. Your answers to 1-3 should total 300 words. Use specific examples to indicate you read.
1. In what ways are maps rhetorical?
2. What can maps not capture?
3. In what ways are maps (and mental maps) “socially constructed”? Part 2: Making connections
4. What’s one of the most interesting things about the reading for you, in terms of thinking through place/space? Or, what’s a connection you can draw between the reading and something else we’ve discussed this semester?
5. What’s a question or idea you hope we discuss in class tomorrow?
THE LINK TO READING/VIDEOS https://twp.duke.edu/sites/twp.duke.edu/files/file-attachments/maps.original.pdf https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eLqC3FNNOaI https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kIID5FDi2JQ
https://courseworkgeeks.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/LOGO.png00adminhttps://courseworkgeeks.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/LOGO.pngadmin2025-09-28 15:34:242025-09-28 15:34:24>Reading homework help