Healthcare Analytics; Regulations, Clinical Quality, and Patient Safety
As many healthcare facilities seek to implement analytical patient quality and clinical value in collaboration with electronic health record management. Automated algorithms are capable of sifting through thousands of patient records to identify potential clinical errors and systematically measure patient safety in ways never before anticipated (Davenport, 2014). Discuss how social media can impact the present and future outlook on health care analytics.
Guided Response: Review your peers’ posts and provide a substantive response to at least two of your classmates’ posts by Day 7. A substantive response is a respectful, professional, and unique response that is at least five sentences in length and incorporates the following:

Highlights the key points of what you have learned from your peer’s post.
Adds your content knowledge.
Compares and contrasts.
Provides further research.
Is topic-related.

Monitor the forum through Day 7 to allow for robust dialogue.

250 WORDS 2 REFERENCES WITHIN 5 YEARS (NURSING JOURNALS ONLY!! IN TEXT CITATIONS ARE A MUST!!

Since October 1, 2008, hospitals no longer receive additional payment for cases in which certain select conditions (e.g., foreign object obtained after surgery, urinary tract infection (UTI) were not present on admission.

  • Discuss how the master’s prepared nurse (depending upon the chosen track) can promote improvement in clinical quality outcomes and patient safety by incorporating proactive interventions that identify potential hospital acquired conditions (HAC). Be specific in the answer.

Purpose: Discussion class 505 .Unit 1

Things to remember:

Discussion post is at least 200 words.

Answers all questions with opinions/ideas creatively and clearly. Supports post using several outside, peer-reviewed sources.

3 References, try to find resources that are 5 years or less

No errors with APA format 6thEdition

To Discuss:

Clinical inquiry will be expressed in the PICOT format (review your text on this):

· Population

· Intervention

· Comparison

· Outcome

· Time

In order to avoid going insane, it is a good idea to use your practice setting as a starting place. Think about some of the things that you do and why you do them. Is there a better way? Are your patient’s experiencing outcomes that are less than optimal? Might there be more effective interventions?

Elements of your PICOT should be narrow and specific. For example: for population, using MedSurg patients is much too general. Be specific. A good example of a specific population would be geriatric patients status post total knee replacement.

https://kaplan.brightspace.com/content/enforced/39849-042-1705C-MN504-01-2316289/topic%202.jpg?_&d2lSessionVal=XTm6OlZv3ngt2oMPvPGURYfky

After you have identifed your clinical inquiry, you need to look for any evidence you can find (at the library) to support the practice or on which to base a practice change. Post your PICOT and evidence by Sunday night.

Please–no topics involving patient falls or handwashing, unless of course these are a VERYserious issue at your practice sight.

Keep in mind that your clinical inquiry will be refined and even possibly change completely during the course of this term. It does not have to be perfect this week. I will give you feedback on your Unit 1 Discussion Topic 2 in order to help get you off on the right track.

Question Description

In this written assignment, identify one specific contemporary issue or trend that you are interested in learning more about. Choose from the categories below. For example you might want to learn more about why it is more difficult for some groups to receive care than others, which would fall under Client Access to Care. Or, you might want to compare nursing practice in the U.S. with how nurses practice in Japan, which would fall under the category of Global Healthcare and Nursing.

  • Global Healthcare and Nursing
  • Healthcare Reform
  • U.S. Healthcare Financing
  • Nursing’s Role in the U.S. Healthcare System
  • Integrative Healthcare
  • Nursing Leadership and Management
  • Nursing Education
  • Nursing Practice
  • Nursing Professionalism
  • Advancing Nursing as a Profession
  • Client Access to Care
  • Delivering Client Care
  • Interdisciplinary Teamwork and Collaboration
  • Ethical Practices in Healthcare
  • Quality and Safety in Healthcare Delivery
  • Health/Nursing Informatics

Once the issue or trend is identified, find five important/significant facts about it, substantiated by an evidence-based article or reference. Include the article or references in your submission.

Submit your completed assignment by following the directions linked below. Please check the Course Calendar for specific due dates.

Save your assignment as a Microsoft Word document. (Mac users, please remember to append the ‘.docx’ extension to the filename.) The name of the file should be your first initial and last name, followed by an underscore and the name of the assignment, and an underscore and the date. An example is shown below:

Jstudent_exampleproblem_101504

QUESTION

Nursing

Can the RN use acupressure for pain and discomfort?

Read the following article:

Initial Discussion Post:

Address the following:

  1. Identify and state which patient symptoms are more likely to be relieved by this treatment. Give the reasons to support this.
  2. Identify and state how the individual RN might incorporate acupressure into nursing practice.
  3. Identify and state in what health care settings acupressure might be an effective integrative treatment to offer to patients. Give the reasons to support your thoughts.

Base your initial post on your readings and research of this topic.Your initial post must contain a minimum of 250 words. References, citations, and repeating the question do not count towards the 250 word minimum.

Question Description

Details:

The Quality and Sustainability Paper is a practice immersion assignment designed to be completed in three sections. This is part two of the assignment. Learners are required to analyze the quality outcomes and/or patient safety measures of a health care entity to determine its successes and failures, identify potential obstacles to the implementation of the measures, and determine what collaborative efforts are needed to create sustainability.

General Guidelines:

Use the following information to ensure successful completion of the assignment:

  • This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
  • Doctoral learners are required to use APA style for their writing assignments. The APA Style Guide is located in the Student Success Center.
  • This assignment requires that you support your position by referencing at least six to eight scholarly resources. At least three of your supporting references must be from scholarly sources other than the assigned readings.
  • You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.

Directions:

Write a 1,250-1,500 word paper that provides the following:

  1. Identify or create a health care entity. (Provide an overall description of this entity without using the real name; i.e. location, size, profit or nonprofit, years in operation). Do not give the real name of any entity or person you are describing.
  2. Using defined quality outcomes and/or patient safety measures, describe the health care entity’s successes and failures. Include identified criteria and data that demonstrate why this entity is successful and in what areas.
  3. Using the quality outcomes data, identify a quality or safety area that nursing science can impact. Describe the specific variables.
  4. Identify potential obstacles that may hinder the implementation of the quality or safety measure.
  5. Identify those groups or leadership roles within the entity with whom you may need to collaborate.
Quality and Sustainability Paper Part Two – Analysis and Application 

1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%2
Less than Satisfactory
74.00%3
Satisfactory
79.00%4
Good
87.00%5
Excellent
100.00%70.0 %Content5.0 %Completed Changes and Corrected Errors to Subsequent Paper, Including Transitions for a Scholarly PaperLearner did not attach previous paper and did not make changes as indicated.N/ALearner attached previous paper and has made changes as indicated. Learner needs to incorporate transitions to connect the ideas between the papersLearner attached previous paper and has made changes as indicated. Learner needs to incorporate better transitions to connect the ideas between the papers.Learner attached previous paper and has made changes as indicated. Learner has includes all necessary transitions to create a scholarly paper.15.0 %Description of Health Care Entity and Identification of Successes and FailuresA heath care entity is not described; the success and failures are not identified.A heath care entity is identified, but a description is not provided. Quality outcomes or patient safety measures are not utilized to identify the success and failures. Criteria and data are not used to substantiate why the entity is successful.A heath care entity is identified and an overall description is provided, but many significant details are missing. The quality measures or patient safety measures utilized fail to accurately identify the successes and failures for the health care entity. Criteria and data do not fully substantiate why the entity is successful, or in what areas.A heath care entity is identified and described, including relevant details. Quality outcomes and /or patient safety measures are utilized to identify the success and failures. Criteria and data are presented that help substantiate why the entity is successful in certain areas.A heath care entity is identified with details that provide insight into the organization. Quality outcomes or patient safety measures clearly define its success and failures. Very detailed criteria and data are presented to substantiate why the entity is successful, and in what areas.20.0 %Identification of Quality or Safety Measure That Nursing Science Can Improve, and Analysis of Supporting DataQuality or safety measure that nursing science can improve is not identified. Analysis of data is not performed.Quality or safety measure that nursing science can improve is suggested, but analysis of data is not performed.Quality or safety measure that nursing science can improve is presented, but analysis of data does not completely support claim.Quality or safety measure that nursing science can improve is presented. Analysis offers support, but more explanation is required to fully demonstrate how data supports claim.Quality or safety measure that nursing science can improve is presented. Analysis is thorough and the data presented supports claim. A very good explanation of the how the data supports the claim is provided.10.0 %Identification of Potential Obstacles to Implementation of Quality or Safety MeasuresPotential obstacles that may hinder implementation of quality or safety measures are not identified.Potential obstacles are identified, but a correlation to how these obstacles will hinder the implication of quality or safety measures is not established.Potential obstacles are identified, but a correlation to how these obstacles will hinder the implication of quality or safety measures is unclear.Potential obstacles are identified. A correlation to how these obstacles will hinder the implication of quality or safety measures is generally established.Potential obstacles are identified. A correlation of how these obstacles will hinder the implication of quality or safety measures is clearly established and shows insight.10.0 %Identification of Stakeholders and Leaders Needed for CollaborationStakeholders needed for collaboration are not identified.Stakeholders needed for collaboration are referenced, but no groups or leaders are identified.Stakeholders needed for collaboration are identified, but the roles of the groups or leaders in the implementation are unclear.Stakeholders needed for collaboration are identified, and the roles of the groups or leaders in the implementation are generally discussed.Stakeholders needed for collaboration are identified, and the roles of the groups or leaders in the implementation are generally discussed.10.0 %Six to Eight Additional Scholarly Research Sources With In-Text CitationsNone of the required elements (minimum of six topic-related scholarly research sources and six in-text citations) are present.Not all required elements are present. One or more elements are missing, or included sources are not scholarly research or topic-related.All required elements are present. Scholarly research sources are topic-related, but the source and quality of one or more references is questionable.All required elements are present. Scholarly research sources are topic-related, and obtained from reputable professional sources.All required elements are present. Scholarly research sources are topic-related, and obtained from highly respected, professional, original sources.20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness7.0 %Thesis Development and PurposePaper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.8.0 %Argument Logic and ConstructionStatement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.5.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.10.0 %Format5.0 %Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent.Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style.All format elements are correct.5.0 %Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)Sources are not documented.Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.100 %Total Weightage

Mary’s one year old daughter is due to be given the Measles, Mumps, and Rubella (MMR) vaccine during her next visit to the doctor. Mary is upset and concerned because one of her friend’s sons became ill after a similar vaccination. She has also heard rumors that MMR vaccine causes rubella. Mary was also told that her daughter will need to be vaccinated before Mary returns to work. Mary is not alone. Many parents face this issue. Therefore, it is important for Mary and all such parents to make decisions that are best for their children, based on facts and not emotions. Place yourself in the role of a health care worker, submit to the discussion area your plan to validate the importance of vaccination by addressing the following questions:

Why are vaccinations necessary components of the healthcare programs?
Are there reasons for people not being vaccinated despite of such elaborate healthcare programs? Explain.
What are the consequences of people not being vaccinated?
What is the impact of religious, cultural, legal, and ethical issues that parents need to consider before vaccination?
What type of information will help the parents make an informed decision about vaccinating their children?

To support your work, use your course and textbook readings and also use the South University Online Library. As in all assignments, cite your sources in your work and provide references for the citations in APA format.
Your initial posting should be addressed at 150-300 words. Submit your document to this Discussion Area by the due date assigned. Be sure to cite your sources using APA format.

n this assignment, you are to select a theory of nursing that fits with your understanding of effective nursing values and practices. Prepare a thorough review of the theory, including a discussion of how this theory will guide your planning to implement the theory in your work as a nurse, will inform you anticipation of barriers to implementation and will assist you in creating a plan to evaluate the effectiveness of care provided while employing this theory.(Imogene king’s theory of goal attainment)

Use the following process to guide your work:

Select one nursing theory that is useful to your practice setting.
Research the literature for refereed journal articles (include current, classic – by theorist, and relevant scholarly sources) that discuss the use of the theory in practice. Use a sufficient number of scholarly sources in your paper, but at least five.
Critically review the nursing theory and develop a plan for how you would utilize this theory in your practice. Be sure to include thoughts related to holistic spiritual nursing care. (Use Chapter 3 of Smith & Parker to review theory.)
In a 6-8 page (not including the title and reference pages, no abstract required for this paper) 6th edition APA paper using spelling/grammar following APA guidelines:
Introduction (Overview, purpose, your rationale for selecting the nursing theory, and plan for paper)
Synthesis of selected nursing theory
Examine the nursing theory’s components
Design plan for implementing nursing theory into practice
Anticipate potential barriers/challenges to implementation
Create plan for evaluating the effectiveness of care provided using this nursing theory
Construct examples.
Summary (explain how you have met the purpose of this paper

1.  In your own words and using the appropriated evidence based references discuss The Purnell Model for Cultural Competence.

2.  Discuss at least 3 assumptions and variant cultural characteristics of The Purnell Model for Cultural Competence.  Give at least 1 example. i need a simple essay of 500 words 

1.  In your own words and using the appropriated evidence based references discuss The Purnell Model for Cultural Competence.

2.  Discuss at least 3 assumptions and variant cultural characteristics of The Purnell Model for Cultural Competence.  Give at least 1 example

Question Description

Based on the research question you created, complete the following tasks:

  • Fit a multiple regression model, testing whether a moderating variable affects the relationship between the predictor and the outcome variable. Think about whether or not the model will meet assumptions.
  • Fit the model, testing for moderation between two key variables.
  • Analyze the output, determining whether moderation was significant and how to interpret that result.
  • Reflect on possible implications of social change.

Write 2-paragraph analysis in APA format that includes your data output and addresses each of the tasks listed above. See pages 641 and 642 in your Warner textbook for an excellent APA-compliant write-up of a moderation analysis.

This is the research question

The research question: “Does the hours of work every week, the level of education and the hours of TV watching every day has a significant effect on income?”

Resources

Warner, R. M. (2013). Applied statistics: From bivariate through multivariate techniques (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.

  • Chapter 15, “Moderation: Tests for Interaction in Multiple Regression” (pp. 611–644)