QUESTION

Executive Summary – Nursing

In this assignment, you will select a program, quality improvement initiative, or other project from your place of employment. Assume you are presenting this program to the board for approval of funding. Write an executive summary (850-1,000 words) to present to the board, from which they will make their decision to fund your program or project. The summary should include:

1. The purpose of the program or project.
2. The target population or audience.
3. The benefits of the program or project
4. The cost or budget justification.
5. The basis upon which the program or project will be evaluated.

Share your written proposal with your manager, supervisor or other colleague in a formal leadership position within a health care organization. Request their feedback using the following questions as prompts:

1. Do you believe the proposal would be approved if formally proposed?
2. What are some strengths and weaknesses of the proposal?

Submit the written proposal along with the “Executive Summary Feedback Form.”

Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

Needs to be 100% PLAGARISM FREE

This paper will have an 8-page narrative (8 pages maximum – 5 point deduction for over page limit) plus a title page, abstract page, and reference list. 

You must use a minimum of four original research articles for your paper.

The purpose is to write a review of the literature on to answer your PICOT question using original research evidence. Discuss how this health problem is applicable in both the United States and a non-USA country, and appraise four original research studies on this topic.

This is a scholarly paper, written as if it was a “Review of the Literature” article published in a nursing journal. Select articles published within the past five years (2014 to present). Do not use a non-peer review journal. Do not use a literature review article or systematic review article or clinical protocols as one of your articles. At least TWO of the four original research report articles MUST BE authored by nurses and published in a peer-reviewed nursing journal.  At least ONE of the two nursing research studies must address nursing practice in a non-USA country.

• Page      1: Title page Create a title for your paper. Refer to your APA Manual.
• Page      2: Abstract The abstract should open with a sentence that will serve      as an introduction to and purpose of the paper. Then describe what is in      each part of the paper. An abstract is usually a brief outline of the      contents of the paper that typically does not exceed 250 words. At the end      of the abstract place the phrase Key Words, and denote 3-4 keywords      that would describe your paper (as for publication and indexing in CINAHL      or PubMed).
• Pages      3-11: Narrative 
• Heading:      Significance and Background: Start the paper with a short paragraph      that introduces the health problem in your PICOT question. (Approximately      ½-page).
• Heading:      Purpose: Clearly define the global health problem, and discuss why it      is important for nursing (why you are discussing this topic).       Discuss what is known about this problem in the United States and in a      non-USA country.  For example, if the focus is adult hypertension,      discuss guidelines for defining hypertension in the US and in a non-USA      country.  (Approximately 1 page).
• Heading:      Methods: Discuss the methods used to select the following research      studies. Next use the subheading:
• Sub-headings:      Study #1: Nursing research Study in the USA (Approximately 1½ pages)
• Sub-headings:      Study #2: Nursing Research Study Non-USA (Approximately 1½ pages)
• Sub-headings:      Study #3: Nursing Research Study USA or Non-USA (Approximately 1½      pages)
• Sub-headings:      Study #4: Nursing Research Study USA or Non-USA (Approximately 1½      pages)
• Heading:      Conclusion.  Summarize the key points from your discussion. How      would you translate (use) the new evidence found from your appraisals to      change practice or answer your PICOT question? (Approximately 1 page).
• Page      12+: Reference page: Refer to your APA      Manual .

Each of the subheadings should include for each article:

• What was the purpose of the study (research questions, purposes, and hypotheses)?
• What was the study design?
• How was the sample obtained?
• What inclusion or exclusion criteria were used?
• Who from the sample actually participated or contributed data? Was the sample size adequate? Explain.
• What methods were used to collect data (e.g. sequence of events, timing, types of data, and measures)?
• Was an intervention /treatment/clinical protocol tested?  Explain.
• What data analysis methods were used?
• What were the main findings of this study?
• Was this a credible study? Why? Why not?

This review is a scholarly paper in APA format and with at least three APA references (two articles and textbook), cited both in the text and the reference page.

 PICOT: In hospitalized patients, does the use of central line care maintenance bundles compared to non-utilization of central line care bundles reduce the rate of CLABSI during the process of improvement implementation?  

PDR-242476 Philosphical perspective with the DNP role Objective: The purpose of the next 2-weeks is to develop a personal nursing philosophy from the perspective as a DNP. Written Assignment: Personal Philosophy Paper: Develop a short (4-6 page) paper excluding a title page and references. The aim of this paper is to develop your nursing philosophical perspective with the DNP role. The first part of your paper will define your nursing philosophy using the concepts of the nursing metaparadigm. The last part of the paper demonstrates how attainment of the DNP reflects your nursing philosophy related to a theorist/theory. A stellar paper (an A paper) clearly demonstrates that a nursing philosophical framework provides the framework for attaining the DNP. Incorporating a nursing theorist is not required unless your philosophy of nursing includes one and you believe it adds or is essential to completing the DNP. A clear connection to nursing science and nursing’s major philosophical concepts (person, environment, caring, health, nursing, transitions, other) is required. The paper should demonstrate a level of comfort or fluency with the subject matter. A stellar paper is well organized, fluid, a joy to read, without spelling or grammatical errors and within the page range (title page, references do not count). Be careful with overuse of first person as well as “this author”. This is a paper that is about your personal perspective, but stellar papers will convey a sense of personal perspective and will avoid the use of “I or me” (first person and “this author”). Accurate use of APA 6th ed. format is expected. Criteria for Personal Philosophy of Nursing Paper: •Introduction- identifies purpose of the paper 5% •Brief description of the factors influencing the development of the personal nursing philosophy 5% •Define, describe and explain your personal thoughts, feelings and beliefs about the concepts of the nursing metaparadigm: 25% ?a.) Person/client ?b.) Environment ?c.) Health ?d.) Nursing ?e.)Summarize the interrelationship of the concepts •Identify and briefly describe the nursing theory or other theorist found to be the most compatible with your personal nursing philosophy 25% •Provide explanation with documentation that demonstrates compatibility of your personal philosophy with the theorist/theory identified in Week 4 & 5 above according to: 25% ?a.) Person/client ?b.) Environment ?c.) Health ?d.) Nursing ?e.) Summarize the interrelationship of the concepts •Summary and Conclusion 5% •APA Format (Organization, grammar, references etc.) 10% •Total 100% See grading rubric for details. Faculty input will be provided after submission of this paper. Submit paper: Session coursework # item type item name calendar/due date start date – end date Actions edit 1. Assignment DNP 634 Written Assignment: Personal Philosophy Paper 5 pages, 6 APA

Please read Rubrics attached Overview The purpose of the three ungraded worksheets for this course is to assist the student in identifying the key pieces of information necessary for completing the assignments and meeting the course outcomes. See the corresponding rubric for specific grading criteria and point breakdown. Do not upload the worksheet; the purpose of the worksheet is to support the rubric. For this course, the student must first select a healthcare issue. The issue must be a public-health policy issue. Students may not use issues relevant for private organizations or institutions, such as internal policy issues. It must be an original policy; one not currently in legislation. The goal of this course is to get the student involved in healthcare-policy issues that impact the general public. This will involve a meeting with local policymakers such as city, county, and school-board officials. Students are free to work at the state or federal level as well. Students must carefully consider their particular policy issue, applicable level of government involved, course time constraints, and objectives/outcomes of the assignments. Students are to select a policy issue, research the issue including policy analysis, plan the policy, and plan meeting with a policymaker for the purpose of presenting the issue, proposing recommendations and asking questions about how change can occur. The student will reflect on the experience, develop plans for follow-up with the policymaker as needed, and consider ways in which advocacy efforts can continue. It is important that students understand that they are not responsible for ensuring the implementation of their policy issue during this eight-week course. The actual implementation of policy changes can take extended periods of time. The student’s responsibility in this course is to plan a meeting with a policymaker and, based on the student’s research of the policy issue come up with a proposition or recommendation to address the issue and then have an initial meeting with a policymaker, ideally in person but alternatively via telephone, videoconferencing, or use of other technology. Be sure to examine all three ungraded worksheets and assignments, including the actual scoring rubrics, now. This ungraded worksheet directly relates to and impacts all ungraded worksheets and graded assignments related to this course. Information noted on the worksheets become part of the graded assignment.

Clinical Case Study Presentation :  Arthritis

Diagnosis, Symptom and Illness Management Presentations (35 Points) 

APA style, that I have access to be able to edit it and add the voices.

You are to do a power point presentation using the following headings below. Present a typical patient with this disease process and how they would present to the office and how you would work up, diagnose and treat. Pictures are encouraged. You will be graded on professionalism and content. Slides need to have Voice Over (Your voice giving the presentation on each slide) Max 20 slides and Max 10 Minutes. Upload to Moodle.

 This may be done in groups of 2 students, both students must have their own voice included in the presentation(We put the voices). The voice of students should be 50/50 divided among the slides(We put the voices). Each student must submit final presentation individually and if done in group, the second person submitting please disregard the Turn it in score as it will say 100% and just add note with submission though Moodle of your partners name. (Group members must have same professor)

Late Assignment Policy

Assignments turned in late will have 1 point taken off for every day assignment is late, after 7 days assignment will get grade of 0. No exceptions