|
Assignment Criteria
|
A
Outstanding or Highest Level of Performance
|
B
Very Good or High Level of Performance
|
C
Competent or Satisfactory Level of Performance
|
F
Poor or Failing or Unsatisfactory Level of Performance
|
| Demographics
5 points
|
Initials, job title, & date of interview are provided.
5 points
|
Initials, job title, or date of interview is missing.
4 points
|
Name is provided instead of initials. Job title or date of interview is missing.
3 points
|
Name is provided but no job title or date of interview.
0–2 points
|
| Required Question #1(Career Path)
30 points
|
Clearly describes career path including education and experiences.
28–30 points
|
Describes career path but, education OR experiences are not provided.
25–27 points
|
Describes career path but does not include experiences and educational background.
23–24 points
|
Briefly describes career path.
0–22 points
|
| Required Question #2(Value of Evidence)
30 points
|
Clearly states value of best practice as a driving force.
28–30 points
|
States value of best practice as a driving force but may have omitted key elements.
25–27 points
|
Briefly describes value of best practice as a driving force.
23–24 points
|
Does not discuss value of best evidence.
0–22 points
|
| Required Question #3(Support Tools)
30 points
|
Clearly describes safeguards and decision-making support tools that support safe practices.
28–30 points
|
Describes safeguards and decision-making support tools that support safe practices but may have omitted key elements.
25–27 points
|
Briefly describes safeguards and decision-making support tools that support safe practice.
23–24 points
|
Does not describe safeguards and decision-making support tools that support safe practice.
0–22 points
|
| Required Question #4(Pt. Care Technologies)
30 points
|
Names or lists 4 or more technologies that improve patient care.
28–30 points
|
Names or lists 3 technologies that improve patient care.
25–27 points
|
Names or lists 2 technologies that improve patient care.
23–24 points
|
Names or lists 0–1 technology(ies) that improve(s) patient care.
0–22 points
|
| Required Question #5(Groups & Utilization)
30 points
|
Names or lists 3 or more groups that rely on information/data AND describes how information is utilized.
28–30 points
|
Names or lists 1–2 groups that rely on information/data AND briefly describes how information is utilized.
25–27 points
|
Names or lists groups but does not describe how information is utilized.
23–24 points
|
Does not name or list groups and does not describe how information is utilized.
0–22 points
|
| Optional Question
30 points
|
Clearly indicates WHICH optional question was asked. Clearly describes answer to optional question.
28–30 points
|
Does not indicate WHICH optional question was asked. Briefly provides answer to optional question.
25–27 points
|
Indicates WHICH question was asked but does not provide answer.
23–24 points
|
Does not include optional question or answer.
0–22 points
|
| Follow-Up Question #1(Practice Impact)
30 points
|
Clearly summarizes what was learned from interaction with interviewee answers. Clearly describes how personal nursing practice will change as a result of learning about roles and responsibilities of interviewee.
28–30 points
|
Briefly summarizes what was learned from interaction with interviewee answers.Briefly describes how personal nursing practice will change.
25–27 points
|
Includes summary OR describes how personal nursing practice will change. Does not include both.
23–24 points
|
Fails to summarize what was learned AND fails to describe how personal nursing practice will change.
0–22 points
|
| Follow-Up Question #2(Scholarly Resources Utilized)
30 points
|
Specifically names two scholarly resources reviewed PRIOR to interview.Clearly states how EACH resource helped prepare for interview.
28–30 points
|
Specifically names twoscholarlyresources reviewed PRIOR to interview.Briefly states how EACH resource helped prepare for interview.
25–27 points
|
Specifically names only one scholarlyresource reviewed PRIOR to interview.Briefly states how resource helped prepare for interview.
23–24 points
|
Names scholarlyresources but does not indicate how resources helped prepare for interview.OR
Fails to indicate resources.
0–22 points
|
| Scholarly Writing
5 points
|
Name of student and date of interview appears on Interview Form. Punctuation and sentence structure are correct. Evidence of spell and grammar check.
5 points
|
Name of student and date of interview appears on Interview Form.Minimal punctuation, sentence structure errors noted.
No indications of grammar or spelling errors (wavy lines) noted.
4 points
|
Name of student or date of interview is missing.Several punctuation, sentence structure errors noted.
Several indications of grammar or spelling errors (wavy lines) noted.
3 points
|
Name of student or date of interview is missing.Multiple punctuation or sentence structure errors noted.
Spellcheck “errors” not corrected prior to submission of assignment.
0–2 points
|
|
|
Total Points Possible = _____/250
|
How Can New Technologies be Implemented Successfully In Healthcare Nursing
Nursing HomeworksHOW CAN NEW TECHNOLOGIES BE IMPLEMENTED SUCCESSFULLY IN HEALTHCARE NURSING
Identify and describe a nursing situation in which you have recognized a problem in your nursing practice
UncategorizedThis paper moves you from a nursing situation to a PICOT question and finally reading some evidence. Research and evidence-based practice starts with questions. These questions can be identified through nursing situations. For this assignment, you will identify and describe a nursing situation in which you have recognized a problem in your nursing practice. The problem must be something that you see consistently, such as central line infections. Next, develop one PICOT question (see p. 30, Box 2.1 templates for a PICOT Question). The types of PICOT questions include intervention, prognoses/prediction, diagnosis or diagnostic test, etiology, and meaning.Next you find an EBP publication and provide a short summary.
This FINAL Paper is graded for points using a Rubric. The faculty provides comment. The TURNITIN report provides you feedback with grammar edits and a similarity report.
You can review the TURNITIN report. A good paper for a writer scholar is less than 25% match in the similarity report.
** Attached includes: Rubric to Follow & My PICOT Question to base this paper on.
** PLEASE follow to instructions and rubric accordingly.
Thank you!
Describe clinical features from a client that led you to believe this client had this disorder
Nursing HomeworksNursing homework help
Week 3: Personality Disorders
I cannot believe these people. Don’t they know who I am? I deserve better treatment than this. That hostess should have seated me immediately, but I had to wait for 10 minutes and then she put me at this table right by the kitchen. I see an empty table right in the middle where I should be. I am just going to get up and move there. I don’t care what the hostess says, rules don’t apply to me.
Ashley, age 25
Personality disorders represent perhaps the most challenging disorders that the psychiatric mental health nurse practitioner will have to address in their professional careers. Personality disorders can co-occur in every mental health disorder and, in some cases, can mask as disorder . Although difficult to treat, the PMHNP must be able to identify personality disorders and endeavor to work with the client to not only recognize the disorder, but to treat a disorder that clients often do not believe they have.
This week, you will explore the many personality disorders and use the DSM-5 criteria for diagnosing individuals with specific personality disorders. You will use the Decision Tree format to diagnose and treat a client with a personality disorder. You also will complete the Fitzgerald University Exit Comprehensive Exam to determine your readiness for the certification exam.
Photo Credit: kaisersosa67 / iStock / Getty Images Plus / Getty Images
Learning Resources
Note: To access this week’s required library resources, please click on the link to the Course Readings List, found in the Course Materials section of your Syllabus.
Required Readings
Sadock, B. J., Sadock, V. A., & Ruiz, P. (2014). Kaplan & Sadock’s synopsis of psychiatry: Behavioral sciences/clinical psychiatry (11th ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer.
Chapter 4, “Theories of Personality and Psychopathology” (pp. 151–191)
Chapter 22, “Personality Disorders” (pp. 742–762)
Chapter 13, “Psychosomatic Medicine” (pp. 451–464)
Gabbard, G. O. (2014). Gabbard’s treatment of psychiatric disorders (5th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Publications.
Chapter 71, “Histrionic Personality Disorder”
Note: You will access this book from Walden Library databases.
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
“Personality Disorders”
Note: You will access this book from Walden Library databases.
Perry, J. C., Presniak, M. D., & Olson, T. R. (2013). Defense mechanisms in schizotypal, borderline, antisocial, and narcissistic personality disorders. Psychiatry: Interpersonal & Biological Processes, 76(1), 32–52. doi:10.1521/psyc.2013.76.1.32
Note: You will access this article from Walden Library databases.
Rees, C. S., & Pritchard, R. (2015). Brief cognitive therapy for avoidant personality disorder. Psychotherapy, 52(1), 45–55. doi:10.1037/a0035158
Kernberg, O. (n.d.). Psychoanalytic psychotherapy for personality disorders: An Interview with Otto Kernberg, MD. [Video file]. Mill Valley, CA: Psychotherapy.net
Note: This video is approximately 94 minutes of length. You will access this article from Walden Library databases.
Discussion: Treatment of Personality Disorders
Personality disorders occur in 10–20% of the population. They are difficult to treat as individuals with personality disorders are less likely to seek help than individuals with other mental health disorders. Treatment can be challenging as they do not see their symptoms as painful to themselves or others.
In this Discussion, you will explore personality disorders in greater detail and discuss treatment options using evidence-based research.
Learning Objectives
Students will:
Analyze diagnostic criteria for personality disorders
Analyze evidence-based psychotherapy and psychopharmacologic treatments for personality disorders
Analyze clinical features of clients with personality disorders
Align clinical features with DSM-5 criteria
Compare differential diagnostic features of personality disorders
Post:
Explain the diagnostic criteria for your assigned personality disorder. (Histrionic Personality Disorder)
Explain the evidenced-based psychotherapy and psychopharmacologic treatment for your assigned personality disorder.
Describe clinical features from a client that led you to believe this client had this disorder. Align the clinical features with the DSM-5 criteria.
Support your rationale with references to the Learning Resources or other academic resources.
EVALUATE THE IMPACT THAT FEDERAL OR STATE HEALTH CARE POLICIES HAVE ON CONSUMER COSTS BOTH POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE EFFECTS.
UncategorizedIn response to federal policy and service requirements, health insurance plans are increasingly developing high-deductible insurance policies and narrow networks. These types of policies require the consumer to pay more out of pocket. To portray this in a positive light, this trend has been labeled as “consumer-based” to suggest that the consumer must pay more from their own funds, and thus, encourage consumers to make better health care choices. On the other hand, this could be labeled as a burden on the consumer.
Write a 350- to 525-word article that identifies and evaluates the impact that federal or state health care policies have on consumer costs. Explore both positive and negative effects.
Publish the article on your own social media account (e.g., LinkedIn, Facebook, etc.), or post it on a health care message board of your choice.
Include a citation of your article in your assignment.
Cite 3 reputable references to support your assignment (e.g., trade or industry publications, government or agency websites, scholarly works, or other sources of similar quality).
Psychology homework help
UncategorizedFormat your paper consistent with APA guidelines.
DEVELOPING A BRIEF PLAN TO RECRUIT FOR 20 NURSING POSITIONS FOR YOUR ORGANIZATION, USING BOTH INTERNAL AND EXTERNAL RECRUITING SOURCES
Nursing HomeworksDEVELOPING A BRIEF PLAN TO RECRUIT FOR 20 NURSING POSITIONS FOR YOUR ORGANIZATION, USING BOTH INTERNAL AND EXTERNAL RECRUITING SOURCES.
· Develop a brief plan to recruit for 20 nursing positions for your organization, using both internal and external recruiting sources. Justify the different resources you will use for this plan. Provide specific examples to support your rationale.
· Analyze two ethical and legal considerations in using standardized interviews or employment tests that assess aptitude, attitude, honesty, and personality during the selection process. Provide specific examples to support your rationale.
4a. “Characteristics of Good Interviewers and Disparate Treatment” Please respond to the following:
· Compile two examples of the worst interviews you ever had. Determine key factors that made these interviews stand out negatively compared to other interviews you have had. Next, recommend three best practices for interviewers to avoid interviewing mistakes.
· A health care organization wants to hire 100 medical technicians, and of the 250 applicants that apply, 125 are male and 125 are female—all equally qualified. The organization hires 80 of the male applicants and 20 of the female applicants. Using Table 4.8, analyze whether or not disparate treatment exists in this hypothetical organization. Provide examples to support your rationale.
4b. “Health Care Professionals and Allied Health Professionals” Please respond to the following:
· Analyze two career options in the health care industry, in terms of the educational requirements, job responsibilities, and average salaries.
· From the e-Activity, discuss two differences between health care professionals and allied health care professionals. Provide specific examples to support your rationale.
4b. “Nursing Shortages” Please respond to the following:
· Suggest two factors that are contributing to the current state of the nursing industry in the U.S. Focus on both internal and external influences. Provide specific examples to support your rationale.
· Analyze two issues that contribute to the current nursing shortage in the U.S., and propose a strategy to rectify this employment issue.
What treatments or interventions would be the first line of protocol for your diagnosis?
Nursing Essay Help>Sociology homework help
UncategorizedBook source URL for the essay below and please you can only use this information for reference. No other outside source is accepted. Chapters 3 and 4 cover information over Eurasia.
https://online.vitalsource.com/#/books/9781538105597/pageid/125
Please note: when you discuss the important consequences or effects of developments you identify or what we can learn from parallel worlds, do not extend your discussion beyond the year 1450. For instance do not discuss their significance for life today. The shape of the current world is beyond the scope of this class. The Final Exam in HIS 233 tests your mastery of course content and this course ends around the year 1450, so your discussion of important consequences or “take-aways” needs to end around that year as well. The nearly 570 years since 1450 (which is the time period covered by HIS 234) have had more impact on the nature of the modern world in any case.
Your exam should be no less than 5 double-spaced typed pages in 12-point Times New Roman font with 1-inch margins on all sides. It can be longer, however, Title, Bibliography, and Works Cited pages are not part of the required page count.
The formatting of the essay and all citations need to follow Chicago Manual of Style format. Chicago is the citation and bibliographic style used by historians. Click on the website links below for Chicago-style guides and examples of humanities and author-date citation styles. You may use either humanities or author-date citation styles but use only one of these styles in your work. The author-date citation style is very close to MLA and APA styles.
DISCUSS THE ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF A NURSING INFORMATION EXPERT
Nursing HomeworksDISCUSS THE ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF A NURSING INFORMATION EXPERT;
Interview with a Nursing Information Expert:
Guidelines and Grading Rubric
Purpose
The purpose of this assignment is to
Course Outcomes
This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes.
CO #1: Describe patient-care technologies as appropriate to address the needs of a diverse patient population. (PO #1)
CO #4: Investigate safeguards and decision-making support tools embedded in patient care technologies and information systems to support a safe practice environment for both patients and healthcare workers. (PO #4)
CO #8: Discuss the value of best evidence as a driving force to institute change in delivery of nursing care. (PO #8)
Points
This assignment is worth a total of 250 points.
Directions
Grading Criteria
Category
Points
%
Description
5
2%
30
12%
30
12%
30
12%
30
12%
30
12%
30
12%
30
12%
30
12%
5
2%
250 pts.
100%
Grading Rubric
Assignment Criteria
A
Outstanding or Highest Level of Performance
B
Very Good or High Level of Performance
C
Competent or Satisfactory Level of Performance
F
Poor or Failing or Unsatisfactory Level of Performance
5 points
5 points
4 points
3 points
0–2 points
30 points
28–30 points
25–27 points
23–24 points
0–22 points
30 points
28–30 points
25–27 points
23–24 points
0–22 points
30 points
28–30 points
25–27 points
23–24 points
0–22 points
30 points
28–30 points
25–27 points
23–24 points
0–22 points
30 points
28–30 points
25–27 points
23–24 points
0–22 points
30 points
28–30 points
25–27 points
23–24 points
0–22 points
30 points
28–30 points
25–27 points
23–24 points
0–22 points
30 points
28–30 points
25–27 points
23–24 points
Fails to indicate resources.
0–22 points
5 points
5 points
No indications of grammar or spelling errors (wavy lines) noted.
4 points
Several indications of grammar or spelling errors (wavy lines) noted.
3 points
Spellcheck “errors” not corrected prior to submission of assignment.
0–2 points
Total Points Possible = _____/250
In your opinion, what is the difference between being a learner and being a scholar? Justify your claims.
UncategorizedThis is a Nursing Doctoral Program
These are two discussion questions. Each needs to be Maximum word count for an initial post is 250 and needs a reference. The tutor needs to have a good command of the English language.
DQ 1
In your opinion, what is the difference between being a learner and being a scholar? Justify your claims.
DQ 2
What are misrepresentations that can occur while reading other’s work and using its data? How can do you determine when data is a useful source of evidence for a project? Is it possible to misrepresent data and conclusions using statistics? Why or why not? How?