A Synthesis paper on the topic of Asthma is needed. I provided a rubric to address the concepts in the left hand column and included additional information below.
4 pages (1000 words) excluding title and reference page.

Needed on or before 06/07/18.

4-8 references

Thank You,

Major Paper Rubric 100 points

This rubric will be used to grade your major paper. .

  Levels of Achievement
Criteria Excellent Good Fair Poor
Content  Epidemiology Definition Pathophysiology 20%  18.6 to 20 points
Identifies the issue and why the topic is important to explore. Determinants of health covered in detail and supported by research. –Topic interesting, of appropriate breadth for length of paper & an appropriate topic for research. –Support for thesis complex, complete, & in-depth. –Writer involved with subject, not merely doing an assignment. –Clear and appropriate organization, with effective transitions, introduction, and conclusion.
17 to 18.59 points
Topic somewhat broad or narrow for length of paper and /or a questionable topic for research. –Determinants of health addressed but minimally supported. –Support for thesis sufficient, but lacking in depth or complexity. –Organization, transitions, introduction, and conclusion slightly lacking clarity and/or appropriateness.
15 to 16.9 points
Topic too broad or narrow for length of paper. –Support for thesis is not substantially sufficient. –Organization, transitions, introduction, and conclusion are inconsistent, lacking clarity and depth
0 to 14.9 points
Topic too broad or narrow for length of paper and/or a poor topic for research. –Support for thesis barely sufficient, and/or. –Organization, transitions, introduction, and conclusion lacking clarity and/or appropriateness. Poor transitions, introduction and/or conclusion.
Quality of Research/Review of Literature
20%
18.6 to 20 points
All components of the paper aea addressed and researched in depth , evidence- based and beyond the obvious revealing new insights
17 to 18.59 points
All components of the paper are addressed are researched in depth, evidenced -based but lacking any new insights
15 to 16.9 points
Incomplete/sketchy addressing of paper components, miminal inclusion of evidenced-based practice
0 to 14.9 points
Some components of paper missing or not addressed Differential diagnoses, management and patient education are missing or not appropriate.
Diagnoses 10% 9.3 to 10 points
More than 3 appropriate differential diagnoses identified and throughly discussed.
8.5 to 9.29 points
3 apppropriate differential diagnoses identified and throughly discussed.
7.5 to 8.49 points
3 appropriate differential diagnoses are identified but are not throughly discussed.
0 to 7.49 points
< 3 appropriate differential diagnoses are identified or 3 differential diagnoses identified but not appropriate and not throuhgly discussed.
Plan of Care/Interventions 20%  18.6 to 20 points
Management including pharmacological and nonpharmacologica interventions and patient education are identified, evidenced-based and throughly discussed.
17 to 18.59 points
.Management including pharmacological and nonpharmacologica interventions and patient education are identified evidenced-based and but not throughly discussed.
15 to 16.9 points
Management including pharmacological and nonpharmacological interventions and patient education are skecthy and/or not evidenced-based and/or not throughly discussed.
0 to 14.9 points
Management including pharmacological and nonpharmacological interventions and patient education are not included or presented but inappropriate.

  Levels of Achievement
Criteria Excellent Good Fair Poor
Role of the FNP related to the topic chosen 15%  13.95 to 15 points
Synthesizes the role of the FNP into the chosen topic based upon ANCC core competencies. EBP guidelines provide the basis for management
12.75 to 13.9 points
Describes the role characteristics of the FNP in relation to the chosen topic. General management strategies identified.
11.25 to 12.74 points
Role of FNP addressed but related tangentially to the chosen topic. Management strategies identified but not specific to the case study or referenced from EBP documents.
0 to 11.24 points
Role of FNP superficially addressed, incomplete or inappropriate management strategies addressed. Poor documentation of strategies. No EBP documentation.
Grammar/ Mechanics 10% 9.3 to 10 points
2 or less errors in format or punctuation or capitalization. –Consistent and appropriate voice. — Sophisticated and precise word choice. Paragraph size appropriate –No spelling errors. No slang. –No errors in agreement, pronouns/antecedents, or tense. –Met all style and min/max page requirements
8.5 to 9.29 points
4 or less errors in format, punctuation, or capitalization. — Voice mostly consistent and appropriate. Lengthy paragraphs — Fairly effective word choice. –No more than 2 spelling errors. –Fewer than 1 errors in agreement, pronouns/antecedents, or tense. –Met most style and min/max page requirements
7.5 to 8.49 points
6 or less errors in format, punctuation or capitalization. Voice somewhat consistent and appropriate. Errors distract from readability. Lengthy paragraphs — Correct word choice. –More than 3 spelling errors. –More than 2 errors in agreement, pronouns/antecedents, or tense. Failed to meet style and/or min/max page requirements
0 to 7.49 points
Many errors in format, punctuation, or capitalization. Paper fails to flow in a logical sequence. Failed to meet style and/or min/max page requirements.
Bibliography 5 % 4.65 to 5 points
Sources reliable and properly cited. A minimum of 8 references (>6 EBP journal articles. All references correctly cited in the paper and the bibliography. All information relevant to topic.
4.25 to 4.64 points
Sources reliable and properly cited but has secondary references. A minimum of 8 references (<6 EBP journal articles. All references correctly cited in the paper and the bibliography. Information relevant to topic.
3.75 to 4.24 points
Sources reliable and properly cited. Articles do not substantially support your topic. 8 references (>6 EBP journal articles. All information relevant to topic.
0 to 3.74 points
Second hand sources and incorrectly cited. Does not have a minimum of 8 references and/ or have less than 6 EBP journal articles. Most of l information not relevant to topic.

Family Analysis Project Submit by 2359 Saturday of Module 5. NOTE: You will create and upload an original Word file for this assignment instead of typing directly into this document. Overview Select one (1) family based on personal/professional acquaintance, to complete a comprehensive, written assessment/analysis using the criteria listed below (based on class notes and readings). DO NOT use your family of orientation (family of origin) or your nuclear (conjugal) family. (For definitions, see the Glossary of Terms in Friedman et al, Family Nursing textbook. Objectives • Examine the impact of functional patterns and role structure on the family. • Examine family relationships and communication patterns. • Identify influences on family health promotion. N3352 Legacy of the Family ©2013 University of Texas at Arlington Page 2 of 5 Grading Rubric Family Analysis Project Target 60 points max Acceptable At least 42 points Unacceptable Less than 42 points Introduction (5 points) Introduction is present and forecasts content of the paper. (4-5 points) Introduction is present and forecasts the content of the paper. (3-4 points) Introduction is present. (0-1 point) Description of Nuclear Family or Variant Family Form (8 points) Comprehensive description of nuclear family or variant family form; demographic trends (composition, form, ages, educational level); developmental stage (7-8 points) Adequate description of nuclear family or variant family form; demographic trends (composition, form, ages, educational level); developmental stage (4-6 points) Minimal description of nuclear family or variant family form; demographic trends (composition, form, ages, educational level); developmental stage. Some elements may be missing. (0-3 point) Sociocultural Data: Cultural/Ethnic Asessment; Social Class Status (5 points) Comprehensive description of the sociocultural data, including an assessment of cultural/ethnic and social class status (4-5 points) Adequate description of the sociocultural data, including an assessment of cultural ethnic and social class status (2-3 points) Minimal description of the sociocultural data, including an assessment of cultural ethnic and social class status (0-1 point) Genogram & Ecomap (14 points) Genogram represents a minimum of 2 generations; Uses correct symbols to demonstrate relationships; Includes symbol legend Ecomap identifies family relationships inside the middle circle; Uses external circles to include representation from multiple formal and informal support systems; Identifies the nature of relationships between family members and support systems; Includes legend (12-14 points) Genogram represents only 1 generation; Uses mostly correct symbols to demonstrate relationships; Includes symbol legend Ecomap identifies family relationships inside the middle circle; Uses external circles to include representation from some formal and informal support systems; Identifies the nature of some of the relationships between family members and support systems; Includes legend (7-11 points) Genogram is incomplete; Uses some correct symbols to demonstrate relationships; Includes symbol legend Ecomap identifies some family relationships inside the middle circle; Uses external circles to include some representation from formal and informal support systems; Identifies the nature of a few of the relationships between family members and support systems; Includes legend. (0-6 points) ©2013 University of Texas at Arlington Page 3 of 5 N3352 Legacy of the Family Environment: Physical Setting (Home, Neighborhood, Community) (5 points) Clearly depicts the physical environment, including the home, neighborhood, and community. (4-5 points) Depicts some of the physical environment, including the home, neighborhood, and community. (2-3 point) Depicts some of the physical environment, including the home, neighborhood, and community. (0-1 point) Communication (5 points) Carefully describes the quality and methods of communication within the family (4-5 points) Generally describes some of the quality and/or methods of communication with the family (2-3 point) Inadequately describes some of the quality or methods of communication with the family (0-1 points) Power Structure: Hierarchy; Power Bases; Coalitions (5 points) Clearly explains the power structure within the family, including the power hierarchy, power bases, and coalitions (4-5 points) Adequately explains the power structure within the family, including the power hierarchy, power bases, and coalitions (2-3 point) Inadequately explains the power structure within the family, including the power hierarchy, power bases, and coalitions (0-1 points) Role Structure: Relationships (Formal & Informal) (5 points) Clearly describes the roles within the family and how they relate to one another, both formally and informally 4-5 (2 points) Adequately describes the roles within the family and how they relate to one another, both formally and informally (2-3 point) Inadequately describes the roles within the family and/or how they relate to one another (0-1 points) Values: Norms & Rules (5 points) Thoroughly explains the values of the family as demonstrated through its norms and rules (4-5 points) Adequately explains the values of the family as demonstrated through its norms and rules (2-3 point) Inadequately explains the values of the family as demonstrated through its norms and rules (0-1 points) Spiritual Activities (5 points) Thoroughly explains the spiritual activities of the family and their role in their lives (4-5 points) Adequately explains the spiritual activities of the family and their role in their lives (2-3 point) Inadequately explains the spiritual activities of the family and their role in their lives (0-1 points) Socialization: Child Rearing Practices; Intrafamily Support/Social Network; Recreational/ Leisure Activities (5 points) Carefully explains each aspect of socialization in the family unit as outlined to the left. (4-5 points) Explains some aspects of socialization in the family unit as outlined to the Left. (2-3. Points) Fails to explain some aspects of socialization in the family unit as outlined to the left. (0-1 points) ©2013 University of Texas at Arlington Page 4 of 5 N3352 Legacy of the Family Adaptation: Role Conflicts/ Overload/ Changes; Coping Strategies (Functional & Dysfunctional); ProblemSolving Skills (4 points) Effectively explains the adaptability of the family through its role conflicts, handling of overload/changes, coping strategies, both functional & dysfunctional, and problem-solving skills (3-4 points) Attempts to explain the adaptability of the family through some of the following: handling of role conflicts, handling of overload/changes, coping strategies, both functional & dysfunctional, and problem-solving skills (1-2 point) No attempt to explain the adaptability of the family through some of the following: handling of role conflicts, handling of overload/changes, coping strategies, both functional & dysfunctional, and problem-solving skills (0-1 points) Health Care: a.Beliefs Regarding Health/ Illness b.Practices Including Promotion/ Prevention Efforts 5 points) Comprehensively covers the healthcare beliefs regarding health and illness, as well as practices to promote health and prevent illness. (4-5 points) Adequately covers the healthcare beliefs regarding health and illness, as well as practices to promote health and prevent illness. (2-3 points) Minimally covers some of the healthcare beliefs regarding health and illness, as well as practices to promote health and prevent illness. (0-1 points) Interventions: a.Recommendations for Strengthening /Maintaining the Family’s Health b.Discuss Interventions Based on at Least One Theoretical Framework 1) Health Belief Model (textbook, pp. 431- 432) or 2) Health Promotion Model (pp. 432-434) (14 points) Completely outlines recommendations for strengthening/maintaini ng the family’s health and discusses interventions based on at least one theoretical framework from the Health Belief Model mentioned in the textbook (pp. 431-432) or from the Health Promotion Model (pp. 432-434) (12-14 points) Outlines recommendations for strengthening/maintain the family’s health and discusses interventions based on at least one theoretical framework from the Health Belief Model mentioned in the textbook (pp. 431-432) or from the Health Promotion Model (pp. 432-434) (9-11 points) Offers a few recommendations for strengthening/ maintaining the family’s health and discusses a few interventions. (0-8 points) Summary/Conclusion (5 points) Includes summary and conclusion (4-5 points) Includes summary and conclusion (2-3 points) Missing summary and/or conclusion (0-1 points) Format, Length, and Quality of Writing (5 points) Accurately follows APA format, is within the required length, and is free of errors. (4-5 points) Mostly follows APA format, is within the required length, and has few errors. (2-3 points) Loosely follows APA format, is within the required length, and contains many errors. (0-1 point) ©2013 University of Texas at Arlington Page 5 of 5 N3352 Legacy of the Family Instructions Once you have selected the family to study, begin your analysis. Use the Rubric on the previous pages to guide your work. CONFIDENTIALITY ALERT! DO NOT USE LAST NAMES FOR FAMILIES THAT ARE PERSONAL OR PROFESSIONAL ACQUAINTANCES. USE INITIALS or FIRST NAMES ONLY. Address each criterion listed in the Rubric in sufficient depth to reflect the data you obtained, your analysis of the data, and your recommendations for interventions. Be sure to include specific examples to validate your analysis. You must use references (textbook, class notes, others), and these must be cited throughout your paper. Submit your analysis in formal writing, typed using APA format. The limit is six (6) content pages. Once your paper is complete, you will follow the on-screen instructions to upload the document into the system.

Communicable Disease
Write a paper (2,000-2,500 words) in which you apply the concepts of epidemiology and nursing research to a communicable disease. Refer to “Communicable Disease Chain,” “Chain of Infection,” and the CDC website for assistance completing this assignment.
Communicable Disease Selection
Choose one communicable disease from the following list:

  1. Chickenpox
  2. Tuberculosis
  3. Influenza
  4. Mononucleosis
  5. Hepatitis B
  6. HIV
  7. Ebola
  8. Measles
  9. Polio
  10. Influenza

Epidemiology Paper Requirements
Address the following:

  1. Describe the communicable disease (causes, symptoms, mode of transmission, complications, treatment) and the demographic of interest (mortality, morbidity, incidence, and prevalence). Is this a reportable disease? If so, provide details about reporting time, whom to report to, etc.
  2. Describe the determinants of health and explain how those factors contribute to the development of this disease.
  3. Discuss the epidemiologic triangle as it relates to the communicable disease you have selected. Include the host factors, agent factors (presence or absence), and environmental factors. (The textbook describes each element of the epidemiologic triangle). Are there any special considerations or notifications for the community, schools, or general population?
  4. Explain the role of the community health nurse (case finding, reporting, data collecting, data analysis, and follow-up).
  5. Identify at least one national agency or organization that addresses the communicable disease chosen and describe how the organization(s) contributes to resolving or reducing the impact of disease.
  6. Discuss a global implication of the disease. How is this addressed in other countries or cultures? Is this disease endemic to a particular area? Provide an example.

A minimum of three peer-reviewed or professional references is required.
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.
NRS427V-RS-CommunicableDiseaseChain.doc

Unit VIII Research Paper
Diabetes the subject that I’m writing about
In a 7-10 page paper (not including title page and reference section) with a minimum of 10 references, select a condition that has been examined during the course and discuss the following:
1. History/background/introduction into the condition.
2. Pathophysiology or proposed origin of the condition.
3. Signs/symptoms/hallmarks of the condition.
4. Monitoring parameters of the condition.
5. Identify the available treatment options for this condition.
6. Discuss the mechanism of action of the available treatments (drug classes).
7. Indicate one nationally or internationally recognized treatment guideline for the condition (if application); First line,
second-line, third-line treatment options.
8. Identify and evaluate any recent research findings (within the last five years) about the future direction of treating
the conditions. Are there any significant changes or has it remained the same?
9. Discuss new treatments in the pipeline (if any).
10. Conclusion: Answer the following:
a. Do you think the treatment of this condition is moving in the right direction for improving people’s quality of
life? Why, or why not?
b. Do you feel there are benefits versus risks or vice versa when it comes to the treatment of this condition?
c. Summarize or provide a take home message regarding your discussion of this condition.
Your paper must include the following elements:
 Cover page
 An argumentative thesis statement
 Headings for the above requirements
 Relevant and specific evidence
 Paraphrase and quotations from outside sources
 A conclusion
It is strongly advised that you select your topic and conduct some research prior to Unit VIII. Starting prior to Unit VIII will allow you the time to communicate with your professor on any questions that you may have and develop a strong topic/thesis. It is also advised that you utilize the resources from the Success Center.
1. Please describe your project in writing using the APA format.
2. Develop your hypothesis. What do you want to know? What are you trying to
accomplish? ( i.e. I want to know are we experiencing more severe storms in the
2000 ‘s era than we experienced in the 1900’s)
3. Each project, should calculate the following:
3.1.1. Mean (Population or Sample) 3.1.2. The Standard Deviation 3.1.3. The Median
3.1.4. The Mode
4. Please discuss the details of your project (i.e. Who, What, When, How).
5. Present the appropriate graphofy our project (i.e.PieChart,Histogram,Frequency
Table, Scatter Plot).
6. Interpret your work. Analyze your calculations. What does it mean to your
hypothesis? (i.e. The range of numbers represents the smallest and largest amounts and all the amounts in between.
This is a list of who uses Statistics
“What is statistical analysis? It’s the science of collecting, exploring and presenting large amounts of data to discover underlying patterns and trends. Statistics are applied every day – in research, industry and government – to become more scientific about decisions that need to be made. For example:
Manufacturers use statistics to weave quality into beautiful fabrics, to bring lift to the airline industry and to help guitarists make beautiful music.
Researchers keep children healthy by using statistics to analyze data from the production of viral vaccines, which ensures consistency and safety.
Communication companies use statistics to optimize network resources, improve service and reduce customer churn by gaining greater insight into subscriber requirements.
Government agencies around the world rely on statistics for a clear understanding of their countries, their businesses and their people” (SAS, 2019).
Take a look at this Website: https://www.sas.com/en_us/insights/analytics/statistical- analysis.html
Reference
SAS. (2019). Statistical Analysis Defined. Retrieved from SAS: https://www.sas.com/en_us/insights/analytics/statistical-analysis.html

Due may 6th.

List and explain current trends on bedside report. (Evidenced based practice on bedside report) 1 to  1/12 page.

APA format

Reference page too.

DEVELOPING A BALANCED SCORE CARD HOW DOES A GROUP GAUGE WHETHER THE STRATEGIC CHANGES THEY IMPLEMENT ARE CREATING SOUND BUSINESS RESULTS?

Discussion: Developing a Balanced Scorecard.How does a group gauge whether the strategic changes they implement are creating sound business results?The effective use of a balanced scorecard can facilitate alignment between strategic initiatives and day-to-day operations. The balanced scorecard may serve as a valuable tool for monitoring progress and assessing the outcomes of a strategic plan and provide a practical means of communication.In this Discussion you examine the use of a balanced scorecard to measure performance related to finances customer/client satisfaction internal processes and learning and growth.To prepare:Review the information in the Learning Resources including this weeks media presentation focusing on the development of performance metrics for a strategic plan. See Figure 8-6: Design your Balanced Scorecard in the Sare and Ogilvie course text.With your Course Project in mind think about how you would develop a balanced scorecard to measure performance including the processes you would use to gather appropriate data.Consider how the use of a balanced scorecard reflects the importance of being able to evaluate progress assess the impact of planned change on performance and determine if the costs are justified in terms of the outcomes.Post an explanation of your plan for creating a balanced scorecard as part of your Course Project including the processes you would use to gather data to measure performance. Explain how the use of this balanced scorecard would enable you to evaluate progress assess the impact of your proposed change and determine if the costs are justified in terms of the outcomes.Read a selection of your colleagues responses. (I will send the peer responses on the handshake private message)Respond to at least two of your colleagues on two different days by offering suggestions for further developing their balanced scorecards. Ask questions to peer responses at the end of every response. Cite your responses.Required ReadingsSare M. V. & Ogilvie L. (2010). Strategic planning for nurses: Change management in health care. Sudbury MA: Jones and Bartlett.Chapter 8 Overview of Strategic Planning Theories: Strategic Planning Architecture (pp. 147166)Fields S. A. & Cohen D. (2011). Performance enhancement using a balanced scorecard in a patient-centered medical home. Family Medicine 43(10) 735739.Copyright 2011 by Society of Teachers of Family Medicine. Reprinted by permission of Society of Teachers of Family Medicine via the Copyright Clearance Center.The authors discuss using a balanced scorecard for quality improvement in patient-centered medical homes.Groene O. Brandt E. Schmidt W. & Moeller J. (Aug 2009). The balanced scorecard of acute settings: Development process definition of 20 strategic objectives and implementation.International Journal for Quality in Health Care 21(4) 259271.Copyright 2009 by Oxford University Press – Journals. Reprinted by permission of Oxford University Press – Journals via the Copyright Clearance Center.In this article the authors discuss the use of a balanced scorecard as a tool for strategic planning in hospitals. The article includes an example of a strategy map timeline and balanced scorecard.Jeffs L. Merkley J. Richardson S. Eli J. & McAllister M. (2011). Using a nursing balanced scorecard approach to measure and optimize nursing performance. Nursing Leadership 24(1) 4758.Copyright 2011 by Longwoods drafting Corporation. Reprinted by permission of Longwoods drafting Corporation via the Copyright Clearance Center.Kollberg B. & Elg M. (2011). The practice of the balanced scorecard in health care services.International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management 60(5) 427445.Retrieved from the Walden Library databases.The authors look at the use of a balanced scorecard for health care performance management in Sweden.Lupi S. Verzola A. Carandina G. Salani M. Antonioli P. & Gregorio P. (2011). Multidimensional evaluation of performance with experimental application of balanced scorecard: A two year experience. Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation 9(1) 7.Retrieved from the Walden Library databases.This article examines the application of a balanced scorecard within a unit in a hospital to compare performance results and goal achievement.Balanced Scorecard Institute. (2013). Balanced scorecard basics. Retrieved fromhttp://www.balancedscorecard.org/BSCResources/AbouttheBalancedScorecard/tabid/55/Default.aspxView the information on this website to learn about balanced scorecards.Mountain State Group. (n.d.) Balanced scorecards for small rural hospitals: Concept overview and implementation guidance. Retrieved March 13 2013 fromhttp://www.ruralcenter.org/sites/default/files/Final%20BSC%20Manual%2010.18F.pdfThe Scarborough Hospital. (2013). Balanced scorecard. Retrieved fromhttp://tsh.to/pages/Balanced-Score-CardThis website provides an example of a balanced scorecard.Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre. (2013). Balanced scorecard. Retrieved fromhttp://sunnybrook.ca/scorecard/index.asp#srThis website provides an example of a balanced scorecard.Required MediaLaureate Education (Producer). (2013a). The balanced scorecard approach [Video file]. Retrieved from the https://class.waldenu.eduNote: The approximate length of this media piece is 3 minutes.Dr. Carol Huston discusses the elements and use of a balanced scorecard as a strategic planning evaluation tool.
******PLEASE NO PLAGARISM !!!!*******
Today, you learned that your organization has a significant change initiative planned within the next 6 months. The chief executive officer (CEO) has asked you, the human resources (HR) director, to lead this change initiative. You will need to motivate your supervisors as they work directly with the employees; their role in this change will be critical. For this assignment, you will start by doing some self-analysis to prepare yourself to take on heading up the change initiative.
First, begin your paper by briefly describing the change that will take place at your organization. Then, browse the Internet to find one of the many leadership style quizzes that are available. Take the assessment to learn more about your personal leadership style. Consider a traditional leadership style test such as What’s Your Leadership Style?. An assessment that gives a more nontraditional leadership style assessment is The Leadership Legacy Assessment: Identifying Your Instinctive Leadership Style. However, feel free to find your own. Ensure that the assessment provides enough analysis for you to be able to determine your own style.
Once you have taken a leadership style assessment, you will then write a reflection paper that includes the elements listed below.

  • Compare and contrast your two top leadership styles. Did your results surprise you? Why, or why not?
  • Evaluate how your leadership style could impact employee motivation and the change initiative.
  • Select two supervisors from those portrayed in the unit lesson to join your change initiative team, and explain why you would choose them. What roles are they best suited to play in the change process, and how will you mentor them to utilize their strengths and improve on their weaknesses?
  • Provide an analysis of the motivational theories that could play a role in successfully leading employees through the change initiative.
  • Identify areas where you think you can improve on your own leadership skills to ensure this change initiative is a success.

Your reflection paper should be a minimum of three pages in length. Your writing should reflect an in-depth consideration and personalization of the concepts presented in this unit, and your interpretations should be insightful and supported.
Any sources must be properly cited. Adhere to APA Style when creating citations and references for this assignment. APA formatting, however, is not necessary.

Instructions

You will create this assignment following the Assignment Detail instructions below. This assignment will be submitted in the Unit 5 – Submission Assignment lesson in intellipath.
Review the tutorial titled How to Submit the Intellipath Submission Assignment.
Please submit your work to this week’s Intellipath Unit Submission lesson. Click the ‘Upload’ button within the submission lesson to access the submission area.  Click the ‘Select file’ button to upload your document, then click ‘Ok’ to finish.
Assignment Description
Animal Kingdom
Organisms are placed in taxonomic classifications based on differences and similarities of their traits. If you know what critical traits to look for, it is possible to separate any animal into a taxonomic category using a dichotomous key.
The common taxonomic categories are Domain, Kingdom, Phylum, Class, Order, Family, Genus, and Species (Specific Epithet). This assignment will explore the Phylum and Class categories.
The assignment document contains a table with nine images. The images are examples of nine different animal phyla: Porifera, Cnidaria, Nematoda, Arthropoda, Platyhelminthes, Annelida, Mollusca, Echinodermata, and Chordata.

  • In column 1, determine and list the correct Phylum name for each animal using the nine Phyla listed in your text.
  • In column 2, using the dichotomous key provided, determine the class for each animal. List all of the dichotomous key steps chosen when using the key to arrive at the class for each animal.
  • In column 3, the Classification Column, write the class name for each animal from the dichotomous key provided and your key steps.

First download U5 Animal Table 2018 document.
Next, download the Dichotomous Key document.
Use the dichotomous key to determine the class category, as shown for each animal (picture), and write the class names under the Classification Column on the table.
For help on how to use the dichotomous key, download and review the document called How to Use the Dichotomous Key.
Submit your completed table.

 
Case 4: The Audit
Conduct a strategic analysis using the Executive Summary template. Prepare and submit a three-page executive summary that discusses what strategic alternatives are available and provide a recommended strategy.
 
Synopsis of the Case: The content of the synopsis should present relevant background facts about the case under examination.
Relevant Factual Information about the Problem or Decision the Organization Faced: State the precise problem or decision the organization faced. The section should include information that addressed the business issue under examination. This section should be no longer than a single paragraph.
Explanation of Relevant Concepts, Theories and Applications Derived from Course Materials: This section should be the bulk of your paper. Analysis of the business problem or decision in light of the course concepts must be presented, as well as the business lesson another organization could learn from this situation. Besides citation to the text, learners must conduct research in the University library related to the top. Citing the textbook only is not enough to demonstrate you understand and can apply the course objectives. Here is where comparative and contrasting positions should be considered and examples and illustrations provided.
Recommendations: Provide logical recommendations to address the business lesson identified above. The recommendations need not to be specific to the organization examined, but should consider how other organizations, if similarly situated, could lessen the impact of the problem or decision identified. Recall, that the organization under examination has already moved pasted this problem so any recommendations made, at this point, are fruitless. The focus of this section should be on what other companies should be aware of to address similar problems or decisions. Citation to the textbook alone is insufficient for analysis in this section. Learners should conduct research in the University’s library to support their positions. Depth of scholarship is not demonstrated by providing personal opinions alone, but by using examples, analogies, comparison and illustrations from the academic literature. Not only does this synthesize the material to assist the reader’s understanding, it is an effective way to present the academic sources and extend the discussion of your ideas. This section should be a paragraph or two.
Alternative Recommendations: This section is not a continuation of the prior. Provide suggestions for how to avoid the problem or decision the examined organization faced. Analysis here should be may be forward- thinking, predictive or, most likely, preventative in nature but tied to the thesis statement. Again, opinion is insufficient to provide the required academic analysis. Sources, other than the text, must be provided to sustain the statements made. This section should be a paragraph, at most.
Conclusion: End the assignment with a summary of the important points made in the document. No new information may be presented. Writing a conclusion can be done by rewording the opening or reformulation the topic sentences of each paragraph to make a summary for the reader. This section should be a paragraph, at most.
attachment
Unit3HomeworkInstruction.pdf