PLEASE ANSWER ALL QUESTIONS AND PROVIDE REFERENCES. LATE ASSIGNMENTS WILL NOT BE ACEPTED. UPLOAD  ASSIGNMENT TO CANVAS. 
1.The nurse working in the cardiac procedures area receives a patient who has undergone a cardiac catheterization via the right femoral artery for evaluation of unstable angina. Prior to the procedure, the patient was NPO for 12 hours, and received a sedative. An IV catheter was placed for administration of the contrast agents and for access in case of an emergency situation. (Learning Objective 6)

  1. What is the rationale for assessing distal pulses immediately after the catheterization?

2.What other assessments should the nurse perform to check for arterial insufficiency?
3.The patient asks why he needs to stay in bed with the leg extended for 2 to 6 hours. How should the nurse respond?
4 After the procedure, why is it important to assess the patient’s BUN, creatinine, and fluid volume status?

Assignment:

Ethics and Evidence-Based Research

Write a 1250-1500 word essay addressing each of the following points/questions. Be sure to completely answer all the questions for each bullet point. There should be three main sections, one for each bullet below. Separate each section in your paper with a clear heading that allows your professor to know which bullet you are addressing in that section of your paper. Support your ideas with at least two (2) sources using citations in your essay. Make sure to cite using the APA writing style for the essay. The cover page and reference page in correct APA do not count towards the minimum word amount. Review the rubric criteria for this assignment.

Part 1: Describe why ethical safeguards designed for clinical research may not be feasible or appropriate for evidence-based practice or evidence-based practice implementation projects.

Part 2:  Review the sectioned headed, Two Ethical Exemplars in Chapter 22 of the textbook (Melnyk and Fineout-Overholt, 2015, pages 518-519). Discuss three main ethical controversies related to implementing Evidence-Based Quality Improvement (EBQI) Initiatives. Describe how these controversies relate to the four core ethical principles.

Part 3: Identify which ethical principles may be in conflict with the concept of “patients having an ethical responsibility in improving healthcare.” Discuss how these conflicts may be resolved.

Assignment Expectations:

Length: 1250 – 1500 words
Structure: Include a title page and reference page in APA format. These do not count towards the minimum word count for this assignment. Your essay must include an introduction and a conclusion.
References: Use appropriate APA style in-text citations and references for all resources utilized to answer the questions. A minimum of two (2) scholarly sources are required for this assignment.

Melnyk, B. M. & Fineout-Overholt, E. (2015). Evidence-based practice in nursing & healthcare: A guide to best practice (3rd ed.) Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer Health. ISBN: 978-1-4511-9094-6. Read Chapter 22.

A useful resource related to this discussion: Overview of the Nursing Process [PDF File Size 331 KB].

A 16-year-old boy arrived at the Emergency Department (ED) after collapsing during a 3-hour practice at summer football camp. The patient had the required physical examination prior to attending the camp, and there were no concerns or physical restrictions documented. He received intravenous (IV) fluids in the ambulance, and is awake upon arrival to the ED. He complains of thirst and dizziness. He has not voided since prior to practice, has dry mucous membranes and tenting. The patient’s pulse is 136 beats per minute, and blood pressure is 88/52 mm Hg. When questioned about the situation leading to his collapse, he states he forgot his water bottle in his room, and was very hot in the required gear. He felt thirsty, but thought he might be seen as weak if he complained to the coach.

Initial Discussion Post:In your nursing diagnosis book, refer to the NANDA-I definitions for the following nursing diagnoses:Deficient Fluid VolumeRisk for Electrolyte Imbalance

  • Which of the two nursing diagnoses would be the priority for this patient?
  • Describe what data was clustered to determine the nursing diagnosis.

Base your initial post on your readings and research of this topic. Your initial post must contain a minimum of 250 words. References, citations, and repeating the question do not count towards the 250 word minimum.

Signature Assignment Description/Directions: Strategic Implementation Plan PowerPoint and Screencast

Your organization has requested that you develop a strategic action plan for a specific issue the healthcare organization is facing. Create a PowerPoint and screencast for the board and other staff that identifies their needs and an action plan to resolve it.

Intro:

1. Examine the relationship between situational analysis and action plans (2 slides)

2. Identify the primary barriers to implementing strategies in health care organizations? How can each be overcome or removed? (2 slides)

Content

3. Examine the strategic issue the organization is facing (2 slides)

4. Evaluate the plan needed. (3 slides)

5. Discuss your decision-making process. (Identify those involved, responsibilities). (2 slides)

6. Create the action implementation plan (Action plan 3 slides, Implementation plan, 4 slides)

This PowerPoint® (Microsoft Office) presentation should be a minimum of 20 slides, including a title and reference slide. Develop a screencast using Screencast-o-Matic and record your video screen. Use narration, images, audio, and video. Use at least four scholarly sources

Nursing is a theory-based profession, thus solidifying the need for nurses to consider how theories are applied to practice. The function of the middle-range theory is to describe, explain, or predict phenomena and be explicit and testable. Middle-range theories are more readily applied to research studies. In addition, middle-range theories are able to guide nursing interventions and change conditions to enhance nursing care. Furthermore, each middle-range theory addresses concrete or specific phenomena by stating what the phenomena are, why they occur, and how they occur.
The second discussion question will focus on middle-range theories. The second question is as follows:
What relationship(s) do you find between middle-range nursing theories and evidence-based practice? Provide one example that uses a specific middle-range theory to support your views.
The Course Objectives for this week include:
CO #1 – Analyze theories from nursing and relevant fields with respect to their components, relationships among the components, logic of the propositions, comprehensiveness, and utility to advanced nursing. (PO#1)
CO #4 – Demonstrate logical and creative thinking in the analysis and application of a theory to nursing practice. (PO#4)
CO #6 – Examine instances where theory is used to guide the development of new knowledge or implementation of evidence-based practice.
(PO #6)

DISCUSSION
Correlational research describes relations among variables but cannot indicate that one variable causes something to occur to another variable. Rather, a statistically significant correlation coefficient simply indicates there is a relation among a predictor variable and an outcome variable.
In correlational research, if there is a statistically significant correlation coefficient between two variables, you want to know that the relation truly exists. This goal is challenging to achieve because other variables that you are not studying may complicate the study and the interpretation of the results.
You may find a spurious relation in which one common causal variable, sometimes referred to as a third variable, is responsible for the observed relation between the predictor variable and the outcome variable. Imagine seeing a news story reporting the findings of a study claiming that children under the age of 17 who viewed R-rated movies showed a greater likelihood of developing a smoking habit. A third variable that could explain both the predictor and outcome variables is permissive parenting. Permissive parents may allow children to view R-rated movies when they are under the age of 17. In addition, permissive parents may not attend to their children’s whereabouts enough to be aware of their smoking habit, or they may not discipline the children for smoking. Therefore, in effect, you cannot conclude that the movie viewing caused the smoking habit. The permissive parenting may have led to the children’s movie viewing habit and their smoking habit.
You may also identify extraneous variables that might influence the outcome variable but, unlike the spurious correlation described above, these variables do not relate to or influence the predictor variable. For example, consider a reported correlation that the number of books in a person’s home (predictor variable) is related to their college GPA (outcome). An extraneous variable could be, for example, a person’s IQ (intelligence quotient) score. The higher IQ might be related to higher college GPA but not necessarily related to the number of books found in a person’s home. There are additional examples of spurious relations and extraneous variables on pages 174–176 of your course text.
In this Discussion, you focus primarily on spurious relations and extraneous variables. After reviewing examples in the course text, you will find your own examples in the media and explain how they might affect the relations between the variables under consideration.
To prepare:

  • Review popular online newspapers and/or online magazines to look for articles on research studies. Look for examples of statements and claims that might reflect a spurious correlation or an extraneous variable.Note: This is not a library assignment, nor should you look for articles that already have reported a spurious relation or extraneous variable. You need to make this connection yourself. For instance, you might see a headline in a news magazine that states something like “Fast-Paced Children’s Television Programming Linked to ADHD.” Look for examples like this.
  • Identify one popular media example of a correlation that could be argued to be a spurious correlation or that illustrates a correlation that may have an extraneous variable.

With these thoughts in mind:

By Day 3

  1. Briefly explain the example and the claim that has been made.
  2. Identify the predictor variable and the outcome variable.
  3. Identify the correlation. Is it a positive or negative correlation? How did you determine this to be the case?
  4. Identify your proposed spurious (third) variable or extraneous variable.
  5. Explain the connection you made among the spurious/extraneous variable and the outcome and predictor variables.
  6. Post the URLs for the media example at the end of your posting.

Note: Be sure to support the responses within your Discussion post, and in your colleague reply, with evidence from the assigned Learning Resources.

You have just opened a healthcare center in a major American city. You have a handful of employees and your main business is to provide urgent-care medical services, pharmacy, patient education, and various kinds of therapy. Answer the following questions?

1. How will you be competitive and provide services at a reasonable cost using technology and innovation? 

2. How will you be able to sustain a competitive advantage using technology and innovation? 

3. What measures would you take to initiate innovative strategies within your company? 

4. Explain what type of innovations is available to you, including dominant design, and incorporate that into your strategy for initiating innovation strategy. 

5. What type of technologies, innovations, etc. will enable you to become a first mover and describe how and when you will implement these strategies? 

6. Describe your strategies for assessment of company performance by using Porter’s five-force model, stakeholder analysis, and other measures. What areas of competition do you need to be especially cognizant of in order to remain competitive and relevant in the healthcare provider industry?

Your report should be 5 – 7 pages in APA format and contain detailed and convincing reasons in support of each one of your recommendations. It is imperative that the support offered for each of your recommendation be based on analysis-based conclusions. 

Background:
The purpose of this assignment is to give you an opportunity to really reflect on what you have learned in this course. You have grown in your understanding and ability to act as a moral agent in analyzing and deciding on a course of action in an ethically challenging situation. You have also had the opportunity to practice making decisions as a team, working with individuals who bring a variety of perspectives to the table.

Instructions:

This paper has two parts. The attached document has details about the content of each part and what to address in each paragraph. Use APA style (1” margins, 12-point Times New Roman Font, double spaced throughout, page numbers on the top right of each page). This should generate a paper that is 5-8 pages in length. You will have a couple of references. Include citations in your text in APA style and a references page in APA style. (If you need help with your APA style citations and references, there is a very nice guide on the UTA Library Website under the Public Health subject guide.)
Prior to submitting your final paper, submit your draft through the Unicheck link and review your Unicheck analysis.
*Note: Part 1 requires that you communicate with a classmate about their position on an ethical case.  Be sure to allow time for this.

  • attachment

    SignatureAssignment-MyGrowthasaMoralAgentandTeamMember2020Accessible-1.docx

Assignment: Relationship Analysis

How does attraction happen and how do relationships form? Attraction and relationships are complex in that they are influenced by numerous factors, including, but not limited to, age and gender of the partners, stage of the relationship, and culture.
For this Assignment, you explore the elements of a relationship and the rules and expectations associated with them. You also examine what influences these elements and rules/expectations.
To prepare:

  • Review Chapter 10 of your course text, Social Psychology, focusing on attachments in childhood and adulthood. Also focus on the factors involved in attraction, romantic love, relationship satisfaction, and romantic breakups.
  • Review at least two of the journal articles in this week’s Learning Resources to explore aspects of attraction and romantic relationships in different cultures. (You do not have to read all of the articles.) Think about how people in a different culture might view and behave in relationships. Notice the similarities and differences between that culture and your own.

The Assignment (2–4 pages):
In a 2- to 4-page paper, analyze a personal relationship you have or have had (or a relationship of someone you know well). This relationship may be a romantic relationship or a friendship. Address the following:

  • Briefly identify the type of relationship you are using as your example and describe each person’s attachment style.
  • Select at least four concepts or theories from your readings that describe in more depth the relationship and/or how this relationship developed, was maintained, or ended.  Analyze how these four concepts or theories relate to the relationship you have chosen to assess.
  • Finally, select a culture presented in one of the articles listed and that neither person is already a part of, in real life. Consider how that cultural context could impact the relationship. Imagine that one or both of the people in the relationship are from this other culture and the relationship is in the development or maintenance stage. How would the relationship be different? Make connections to what you learned from your selected journal article by discussing some of the research findings.
  • Would your four selected concepts or theories still apply in the same way in terms of relationship development or relationship maintenance? If not, what would differ? Would another concept or theory be more applicable, and why?
By Day 7

Submit your Assignment.

Note: Support the responses within your Assignment with evidence from the assigned Learning Resources. Provide a reference list for resources you used for this Assignment.

Submission and Grading Information

To submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following:

  • Please save your Assignment using the naming convention “WK5Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” as the name.
  • Click the Week 5 Assignment Rubric to review the Grading Criteria for the Assignment.
  • Click the Week 5 Assignment link. You will also be able to “View Rubric” for grading criteria from this area.
  • Next, from the Attach File area, click on the Browse My Computer button. Find the document you saved as “WK5Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” and click Open.
  • If applicable: From the Plagiarism Tools area, click the checkbox for I agree to submit my paper(s) to the Global Reference Database.
  • Click on the Submit button to complete your submission.
Grading Criteria

To access your rubric:
Week 5 Assignment Rubric

Check Your Assignment Draft for Authenticity

To check your Assignment draft for authenticity:
Submit your Week 5 Assignment draft and review the originality report.

Submit Your Assignment by Day 7

To submit your Assignment:
Week 5 Assignment

Final Project

Purpose of Assignment

This project is the culmination of all the work you have been getting together. This includes the discovery assignment, empathy map, wireframes, and prototypes. Your website does not need to be fully functional, but it should appear correctly. Basic actions like links should work correctly.

Assignment Description

Design Elements
Your web site must contain each of the following design elements

  • Minimum of 5 pages (including the homepage and the other page for which you submitted wireframes).  Any other secondary pages you want to include.
  • HTML5 document type declaration on EVERY page
  • HTML5 tags(header, footer, section, main, article, aside, nav).
  • Proper use of heading levels to organize pages.
  • Appropriate integration of color and visual interest elements (images, rules, multimedia, etc.).
  • One custom web font.
  • Use of CSS3 for page layout.
  • Responsive design.
  • Appropriate, meaningful inclusion of forms (although they may not function at this point).
  • Unique and proper usage of page titles values on every page.
  • Use of meta description tag to appropriately describe the page.
  • Use mobile breakpoints. Same breakpoints as the assignments.
  • Other best practices covered in class or in your assigned readings (naming conventions, naming of folders, separate CSS, etc.).
  • A sitemap.xml will be required for your project. Check out this tutorial (Links to an external site.)
  • You will be required to implement Google Analytics (Links to an external site.)(even if it’s nonfunctional).
  • Your homepage should be named index.html.

Coding
The code you create for your web pages must meet industry standard requirements for ‘acceptable code’; code that is easy to read is easy to update and fix. Your code should:

  • Have tags, attributes, and attribute values typed in all lowercase letters, and attribute values enclosed with double quotation marks. Consistently creating code using this format will only make your pages easier to debug, For example
    <p align=”center”>Welcome!</p> is correct
    <P ALIGN=CENTER>Welcome!</P> is incorrect
    <P Align=”center”>Welcome!</P> is incorrect
    <p align=center>Welcome!</p> is incorrect
  • Optional closing tags should be present. Browsers vary in how forgiving they are of non-closed tags. Although your browser may display list items, table cells and paragraphs without the closing </li>, </td>, and </p> tags (respectively), your viewers’ browsers might not. Also, as we learn how to format pages with styles non-closed tags can cause confusion as formatting from one section ‘leaks’ into another.
  • Make appropriate use of hard returns and indents. See my example below to recognize the visual cues this offers:
    <div><p>Hello World</p><p>This is my website</p></div>
    The above will display identically to the code below, but it should be clear which is easier to read and to check for errors
    <div id=”content’>
             <p>Hello World</p>
             <p>This is my website</p>
    </div>.

Required Elements

  1. Complete the items listed to finish this assignment.

Assignment Instructions

  • Design your own web page. Do not use a template or wizard to generate this page. Please do not submit a white background page.
  • Create your Project Brief in HTML5/CSS. HTML/CSS must not have any validation errors.  Use the HTML validator(Links to an external site.), and CSS validator (Links to an external site.) to check your code. See HTML/CSS requirements below.
  • Post your Project Brief to your web server.
  • Create a .zip file that contains both the HTML and CSS files. Title the Assignment “YourName-Final-Project.zip”. Submit your zip file to Canvas assignment.

HTML5/CSS3 requirements
A HTML file that will contain:

    • HTML 5 <doctype> tag
    • Use of <header> tag
    • Use of <article> tag. Content will reside inside <article> tag.
    • Use of <footer> tag
    • Use of appropriate usage of <h1> and <h2> tags. Use other header tags if necessary.
    • Proper label within <title></title> tag
    • Use of <meta description> and proper description

A CSS file that will contain:

    • Must use external CSS file.
    • Must style font color, at least two different font sizes
    • Use of a custom web font
    • Appropriate use of classes, IDs selectors
    • Style groups of tags
    • Style structural elements: header, footer, and article

Grading Criteria is simple. If you completed all “Required Elements” then you get highest points. If you completed some then you get mid points. If you did not complete then you will get no points.

Rubric

Final Project Rubric (1)

Final Project Rubric (1)
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDesign Elements
All of the design elements specified above are present.
Site has a minimum of 5 well-developed pages.
20.0 to >18.0 pts
Exceeds Expectations
18.0 to >16.0 pts
Meets Expectations
16.0 to >14.0 pts
Needs improvement
14.0 to >0 pts
Missing
20.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeNavigation/Site Organization
The navigation layout and style effectively guides visitors.
Ordered or unordered lists are used appropriately.
All links are active and work properly.
Site can be hosted by extracting zip file to web root folder without any manual steps.
20.0 to >18.0 pts
Exceeds Expectations
18.0 to >16.0 pts
Meets Expectations
16.0 to >14.0 pts
Needs improvement
14.0 to >0 pts
Missing
20.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePresentation
The site is aesthetically appealing.
Colors are coordinated.
Each page loads quickly.
Images and/or animation enhance, not detract, from the pages.
The site has been spell checked, and is grammatically correct.
Site builds on wireframes developed.
25.0 to >23.0 pts
Exceeds Expectations
23.0 to >20.0 pts
Meets Expectations
20.0 to >14.0 pts
Needs improvement
14.0 to >0 pts
Missing
25.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCoding
The HTML Validates.
The CSS Validates.
All of the necessary basic tags are in place.
HTML coding has been written using lowercase letters, and quotation marks are present around all attribute values.
The code is easy to read.
Use of CSS techniques studied.
25.0 to >23.0 pts
Exceeds Expectations
23.0 to >20.0 pts
Meets Expectations
20.0 to >14.0 pts
Needs improvement
14.0 to >0 pts
Missing
25.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFolder Organization
The site is completely organized in the appropriate folder structure.
There is an images folder, and all images are stored within that folder.
If needed, there are folders for sound, video, etc. files.
Site pages are organized and stored at the root level of the main folder and any other sub folders (as it fits your IA).
5.0 to >4.0 pts
Exceeds Expectations
4.0 to >3.0 pts
Meets Expectations
3.0 to >2.0 pts
Needs improvement
2.0 to >0 pts
Missing
5.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFormatting and Style
Required elements listed in the Assignment Description are present as described. Adheres to UCOL Format and Style Requirements, including Turabian Author-Date citations, if applicable.
5.0 to >4.0 pts
Exceeds Expectations
4.0 to >3.0 pts
Meets Expectations
3.0 to >2.0 pts
Needs improvement
2.0 to >0 pts
Missing
5.0 pts
Total Points: 100.0