Key Provisions Related to Nursing

IDENTIFY THE IMPACT OF THIS LEGISLATION ON YOUR NURSING PRACTICE BY CHOOSING TWO KEY NURSING PROVISIONS OUTLINED IN THE AMERICAN NURSES ASSOCIATION “KEY PROVISIONS RELATED TO NURSING

 NO COMMENTS
DQ1. The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) was passed into legislation in March of 2010. Identify the impact of this legislation on your nursing practice by choosing two key nursing provisions outlined in the American Nurses Association “Key Provisions Related to Nursing” summary athttp://www.rnaction.org/site/DocServer/KeyProvisions_Nursing-PublicLaw.pdf?docID=1241&verID=1. Discuss how these two provisions have impacted, or will impact, your current practice of nursing.
DQ2. Describe one innovative health care delivery model that incorporates an interdisciplinary care delivery team. How is this advantageous to patient outcomes?
/by

Computer Science homework help

  2019 Georgia Cyberattacks
You are assigned with the task of writing a 1500-2000 word critical analysis academic paper on the incident response and disaster recovery of a specific cybersecurity incident. You will find your assigned cyberattack/breach in the list below. Your paper must analyze how the targeted/victim organization detected, responded to, and recovered from the attack. Your paper must include the following:
1. It must be 1500-2000 words not including the references (you will lose marks if you exceed or fail to meet the wordcount by).
2. It must be an original work of your own research and writing skills, free of plagiarism.
3. It must be in the ieee format with correct citations and references.
4. It must be written in professional academic language free of colloquialisms but also written so that a reader with an unknown level of knowledge (such as a C level executive, a board member, or manager) can understand your meaning, argument, and purpose.
5. You must use reliable sources. i.e. Trusted verifiable web resources (i.e. legitimate websites, news resources, white papers, peer reviewed works such as books, conference papers, reports journal articles, etc) NOT Wikipedia or personal blogs.
6. Your paper must have an introduction with a clearly stated thesis (an argument statement that tells the reader the point you will make. For example, XYZ company’s response to the ABC cyberattack was poorly managed due to a lack of communication or 123 Corp prevented severe financial losses due to their incident response handling). The introduction is the roadmap/outline to your paper. Following the introduction there must be a body containing the history of the attack/breach and an analysis of the incident that supports and proves your thesis. Lastly, you must write a conclusion that states how you have proven your argument and why it matters to Contingency Planning (IRP, BCP, DRP). The written part of the paper must be followed by a properly formatted list of references.
  • attachment

    Rules1.docx
/by

Exposure to pistachio pesticides and stillbirth

Epidemiology Week 9


Describe and then critically analyze a recently published epidemiological research article by comparing or contrasting it with another article. You may use the pre-selected articles of Set A below.
Please remember: APA format, and turnitin report will be generated. 6 pages and double spaced.
Set A
Exposure to pistachio pesticides and stillbirth: a case-control study
Prenatal exposure to organochlorine pesticides and infant birth weight in China
Read each article carefully. Re-read your chosen set and ask, “How are these articles similar?” “What do they have in common?” “How are they different?” “How are they not alike?”  Make some written notes about each article in your chosen set.  Compose a basic outline for your paper, including paragraphs for Introduction (ending in a thesis statement, one sentence that lays out what your paper will do), Background, Multiple body paragraphs containing the bulk of your information, Conclusion.
In writing your paper, follow these guidelines. 1) Begin your paper by introducing the problem being investigated. 2) Give a detailed description of the study (why it was done, who conducted it, who the subjects were, what the results showed, and what the authors concluded from the results). 3) After describing the article, you must use critical thinking to analyze it. Critical thinking about epidemiological studies involves determining whether the evidence gathered and described by the authors is appropriate to answer the questions they are trying to answer and whether this evidence supports the conclusions eventually drawn by the authors. This is where you compare and contrast one study to the other study of the set you have chosen. 4) The last portion of the paper should state your conclusions regarding your analysis.
You must include  at least   two  references showing where you derived your information and those references should be cited with-in the text of your paper.  You will also probably want to cite some information from your textbook.
After putting your paper together, you will want to condense/summarize the most important information into an abstract, which is a brief/short summary of the paper.
Your completed paper should be 5-7 double-spaced pages in length (including title page, abstract, and reference page) and  conform to the APA standard format .  Be sure you take time to proofread your paper well, maybe even enlist the help of an outside pair of eyes to check your final draft.  Once you have completed your paper and saved as a Word document, you must submit the paper to your instructor via Turnitin.
/by

& Pharmacologic Therapy Discussion Questions Essay

Endocrine System: Selected Pathophysiology & Pharmacologic Therapy Discussion Questions Essay
Discussion Question 1
Share a case study from your clinical practice or from the literature on an endocrine disorder. Discuss the pathophysiology of the disorder, including the effects on the endocrine feedback system, and the role of the hypothalamic-pituitary axis. Identify the pharmacologic agent(s) used to treat the disorder and how the pharmacologic agent(s) alters the pathophysiology?
ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER NOW
References

  1. Pharmacology for Nursing Care

Lehne, R. A. (2015). Pharmacology for nursing care (9th ed.). St. Louis: Saunders/Elsevier. ISBN-13: 9780323321907. Endocrine System: Selected Pathophysiology & Pharmacologic Therapy Discussion Questions Essay.

  1. Pathophysiology: The Biologic Basis for Disease in Adults and Children

McCance, K. L., Huether, S. E., Brashers, V.L., and Rote, N. S. (2013). Pathophysiology: The biologic basis for disease in adults and children (7th ed.). St. Louis: Mosby Elsevier. ISBN-13: 9780323088541
Discussion Question 2
Human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG) is currently being used as an aid to weight loss in conjunction with an extremely restricted caloric intake of 500 calories per day. Many people are buying the HCG through the Internet with no medical surveillance. Research the HCG diet and share your thoughts on the efficacy, safety, and validity of the diet. What strategies would you use to educate patients on the diet? Endocrine System: Selected Pathophysiology & Pharmacologic Therapy Discussion Questions Essay

/by

SOAP format

Soap Note

Students must post one interesting case that he/she has seen in the clinical setting via Discussion Board in the online part of this course. The case should be an unusual diagnosis, or a complex case that required in-depth evaluation on the student’s part. The case should be posted in the SOAP format, with references for the patient diagnosis, differential diagnoses (there should be at least 3), and the treatment plan. Notes will be graded as “pass/fail”. In order to receive grade points for SOAP notes, the notes must be approved by the deadlines specified on the course assignments page. The student will lose the opportunity for points on any SOAP notes not approved by the specified deadlines. The posting does not have to be written in APA format, but should be written with correct spelling and grammar. References should be in APA format. The selected references should reflect current evidence – dated within the past 5 years.
 
Students must post one interesting case that he/she has seen in the clinical setting via Discussion Board in the online part of this course. The case should be an unusual diagnosis, or a complex case that required in-depth evaluation on the student’s part. The case should be posted in the SOAP format, with references for the patient diagnosis, differential diagnoses (there should be at least 3), and the treatment plan. Notes will be graded as “pass/fail”.  In order to receive grade points for SOAP notes, the notes must be approved by the deadlines specified on the course assignments page. The student will lose the opportunity for points on any SOAP notes not approved by the specified deadlines. The posting does not have to be written in APA format, but should be written with correct spelling and grammar. References should be in APA format. The selected references should reflect current evidence – dated within the past 5 years.
Clinical Case Grading Criteria: The SOAP note will be submitted through Blackboard. The focus of the presentation must reflect the learning objectives of the course and drawn from the current clinical setting of the student practice site. The evaluation of the presentation is based on the following:
Chief Complaint & pertinent history
10
 
Pertinent exam and diagnostics
10
 
Working diagnosis with supporting criteria
5
 
Management plan
5
 
Epidemiological data – cited from literature
10
 
Evidenced based rationale for treatment (literature based)
10
 
Analysis of self-care and family issues r/t diagnosis and treatment plan
20
 
Evaluation parameters to be used (or were used) to determine outcomes
10
 
Identify major “lessons learned” and how it may affect your future practice
20
 
Total
100
/by

PCN-525: CLC Project Peer Evaluation Form

Peer Evaluation


PCN-525: CLC Project Peer Evaluation Form
Complete the following page using the criteria and point distributions below. Your instructor will calculate a cumulative weighted score based on your project involvement and peer evaluations. You will be doing a self-evaluation as well as an evaluation for each member of the team.
Note: A normal, acceptable score on all categories is 2. Getting a 3 is going above and beyond normal expectations and should not be given lightly.

Score 0 1 2 3
Team Contributions (Knowledge and Expertise) Did not collect any relevant information. Offered no useful suggestions to address the team’s needs. Collected information when persuaded. Attempted to offer some ideas, but not well developed and/or clearly expressed. Collected useful information related to the project or assignment. Offered useful ideas to meet the needs of the team. Collected and presented a great deal of relevant information. Offered well-developed and clearly expressed ideas that directly related to the project or assignment.
Taking Ownership (Participation and Accountability) Did not perform agreed upon tasks. Often missed meetings and/or when present, did not add value to the discussion. Relied upon others to do their work. Completed agreed upon tasks but needed reminders. Attended meetings regularly but generally did not add value to the discussion. Sometimes relied on others to do the work. Completed all agreed upon tasks. Attended meetings regularly and usually participated effectively. Generally reliable. Effectively completed all agreed upon tasks. Attended all meetings and participated enthusiastically. Reliable and dependable.
Valuing Other Team Members (Attitude and Relationships) Often argued with teammates. Discouraged conversation from others. Occasional personal attacks and “put-downs.” Wanted to have things done their way and did not listen to alternate ideas. Attempted to dominate discussion. Did not pay much attention when others talked and often assumed other ideas would not work. No personal attacks or put-downs, but sometimes difficult to work with. Generally listened to the ideas and viewpoints of others. Always used appropriate and respectful tone and language. Attempted to make an effort to understand the ideas and viewpoints of others. Always listened to the ideas and viewpoints of others. Helped team members to develop their ideas while giving them credit, and using alternate views to guide discussion. Assisted the team in reaching collaborative decisions.

PCN-525: CLC Project Peer Evaluation Form

Your Name: _______________________________________
(first and last name)		 Team Member: _______________________________________
(first and last name)
Team Contributions Score: _____________
Justification:__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________		 Team Contributions Score: _____________
Justification:__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Taking Ownership Score: _____________
Justification:__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________		 Taking Ownership Score: _____________
Justification:__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Valuing Other Team Members: _____________
Justification:__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________		 Valuing Other Team Members: _____________
Justification:__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Team Member: _______________________________________
(first and last name)		 Team Member: _______________________________________
(first and last name)
Team Contributions Score: _____________
Justification:__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________		 Team Contributions Score: _____________
Justification:__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Taking Ownership Score: _____________
Justification:__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________		 Taking Ownership Score: _____________
Justification:__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Valuing Other Team Members: _____________
Justification:__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________		 Valuing Other Team Members: _____________
Justification:__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

© 2018. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

/by

Research Analysis

Using the ‘Week 4 | Part 4’ section of your Academic Success and Professional Development Plan Templatepresented in the Resources, conduct an analysis of the elements of the research article you identified. Be sure to include the following:

  • Clearly identify the topic of interest you have selected.
  • Provide an accurate and complete APA formatted citation of the article you selected, along with link or search details.
  • Clearly identify and describe in detail a professional practice use of the theories/concepts presented in the article.
  • Provide a clear and accurate analysis of the article using the Research Analysis Matrix section of the template.
  • Write a 1-paragraph justification that clearly and accurately explains in detail whether you would recommend the use of this article to inform professional practice. Note: You can use the CARP method as presented in the Resources for this week on evaluating resources.
  • Write a 2- to 3-paragraph summary that you will add to your Academic Success and Professional Development Plan that includes the following:
    • Clearly and accurately describe in detail your approach to identifying and analyzing peer-reviewed research.
    • Clearly identify and accurately describe in detail at least two strategies that you would use that you found to be effective in finding peer-reviewed research.
    • Provide a complete, detailed, and specific synthesis of at least one resource you intend to use in the future to find peer-reviewed research.
    • Integrate at least one outside resource and 2-3 course specific resources to fully support your summary.
/by

Pharmacotherapy for Respiratory Disorders

 Nursing homework help

Discussion: Pharmacotherapy for Respiratory Disorders

To the untrained ear, most coughs sound the same. However, as you might recall from past clinical experiences, a simple cough can lead to a patient diagnosis of a common cold, pneumonia, or even a chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Although it can sometimes be challenging to diagnose a patient based on common respiratory symptoms such as congestion, coughing, and wheezing, it is important to be able to distinguish minor differences as even mild symptoms might require intervention with drug treatments. When recommending potential treatment options, advanced practice nurses must consider how individual patient factors might impact the effects of prescribed drugs.

To prepare:
  • -Review Chapter 26 and Chapter 27 of the Arcangelo and Peterson text.
  • -Select and research one of the following respiratory disorders: the common cold, pneumonia, or a chronic obstructive —-pulmonary disease (COPD) such as emphysema or chronic bronchitis. Consider types of drugs that would be prescribed to patients to treat symptoms associated with this disorder.
  • -Select one of the following factors: genetics, gender, ethnicity, age, or behavior. Reflect on how this factor might impact effects of prescribed drugs, as well as any measures you might take to help reduce negative side effects.

With these thoughts in mind:

By Day 3

Post a description of the respiratory disorder you selected including types of drugs that would be prescribed to patients to treat associated symptoms. Then, explain how the factor you selected might impact effects of prescribed drugs, as well as any measures you might take to help reduce negative side effects.
THE DISCUSSION IS IN APA, MINIMUM 3 REFERENCES NOT OLDER THAN 2013 AND CITATION.

Required Readings

Arcangelo,  V. P., Peterson, A. M., Wilbur, V., & Reinhold, J. A. (Eds.).  (2017). Pharmacotherapeutics for advanced  practice: A practical approach (4th ed.). Ambler, PA: Lippincott Williams  & Wilkins.
Chapter 18, “Otitis Media and Otitis Externa” (pp. 243-252)
This chapter compares the causes and pathophysiology of two common ear infections—otitis media and otitis externa. It also identifies types of drugs used to treat these ear infections.
Chapter 24, “Upper Respiratory Infections” (pp. 259-374)
This chapter explores the causes, pathophysiology, and diagnostic criteria of two upper respiratory infections—the common cold and sinusitis—as well as drug therapy for both infections. It also covers monitoring patient response and patient education of drug therapy for these infections.
Chapter 25, “Asthma” (pp. 377-392)
This chapter examines the causes, pathophysiology, pharmacogenomics, and diagnostic criteria of asthma. It also outlines suggested drug therapy plans for asthmatic patients.
Chapter 26, “Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease” (pp. 395-406)
This chapter explains the causes and pathophysiology of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). It also examines the process of selecting, administering, and managing drug therapy for COPD patients.
Chapter 27, “Bronchitis and Pneumonia” (pp. 407-424)
This chapter begins by examining the causes, pathophysiology, and diagnostic criteria of acute bronchitis, chronic bronchitis, and community-acquired pneumonia. It then explores the process of selecting, administering, and managing drug therapy for patients with bronchitis and pneumonia.

Drugs.com. (2012). Retrieved from http://www.drugs.com/
This website presents a comprehensive review of prescription and over-the-counter drugs including information on common uses and potential side effects. It also provides updates relating to new drugs on the market, support from health professionals, and a drug-drug interactions checker.

National Heart Lung and Blood Institute. (2007). Expert panel report 3 (EPR3): Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of asthma. Retrieved from http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/guidelines/asthma/asthgdln.htm
This website presents guidelines for diagnosing and managing asthma and outlines treatment recommendations for specific age groups.

/by

English homework help

English 1301 – Fall 2020
Major Essay #4 – Collaborating for Critical Thinking
Collaborative Essay & Presentation / Explore the Meaning(s) of ____________)
Essay Due: – Wednesday, November 11 – Submit via BlackBoard by 11:59 p.m.
Presentations begin November 10, 2020
 
Purpose: to interpret and inform:
 
For this assignment, students will choose a topic of their own liking to convey its meaning(s). Essay projects must meet the following criteria:
 
Use of third person point of view only
The essay must include a strong thesis statement
Creative title
Use many examples/details to build logical, effective body paragraphs
Use of appropriate transitions
Use of 4 – 5 credible sources – ONE source must be from a database
Proper use of MLA format
8 to 10 pages
Well organized
Avoid 2nd person point of view (you, your, yours, yourself, yourselves) at all times
 
Before beginning this project, consider a group may want to explore a topic in psychology, communication, history, sociology. Consider abstract topics such as love, beauty, life or a specific law. Consider words such as, cheesy, forgiveness, capping or even an ‘ism’… racism, communism, socialism or organizations: Black Lives Matter, Neo-Nazis, White Nationalists, Preppers, Gen Z, Gen X, boomers, motherhood, etc.
 
Organization of the essay must include a solid introduction, body paragraphs and a conclusion. One of the body paragraphs must address any issues or other contrasting points about students’ pitch subject. Be selective in the details chosen to include in the body paragraphs.
 
The essay must be in MLA format: double spaced, 1” margins, a header with required information, student last names with a page number in the upper right hand corner, and Times New Roman font at 12 point in size throughout. Do not do fancy lettering and/or designs with the title. Only use appropriate initial capitalization in the title. Do not include a title page.
 
The presentation element of this project should be creative and highly effective. Remember in presenting the meaning(s) of, students need to go beyond mere Webster definitions, but should include visuals that accompany the presentation of meaning(s). Show to inform your audience-readers. Criteria for this part of the project will be graded on the following:
 
Topic
A short Powerpoint, Prezi or video to highlight the written project
Group collaboration
Organization
How well supported the meaning(s) comes off to the audience
 
Each group has between 8 to 10 minutes to present. Peer-Audience should be prepared to ask questions, offer criticism, comments, suggestions, and opinions.
 
Mostly, have fun!! Post in your Wix accounts!

/by

Term Papers Privacy In the workplace

Question Description

Term papers on practically every subject imaginable are available on the Internet. Many of those who submit the papers as their own work defend their practice in Various ways: (1) These papers are posted to assist in research in the same way any other resource is posted on the Web and should simply be cited if used; (2) these papers are posted in order to encourage faculty to modify paper topics and/or exams and not to simply bring back assignments that have been used countless times in the past, (3) they don’t have time to complete a paper and since they have paid for the course they have in effect paid for the degree, and (4) if the professor doesn’t “catch” them what harm has been done?

Are you persuaded?

Write a 3 page, APA style paper addressing the above issues while answering the following:

  1. Is there anything unethical about this service in general?
  2. If so, who should be held accountable, the poster, the ultimate user (student), the professor, the university, or someone else?

Use the ethical decision making model process to determine the ethics of the term paper service.

Provide 3-5 APA style references both inline and at the end of the paper to support your analysis. Note: This is your opportunity to demonstrate your knowledge of the week’s theory linked to personal opinion and outside evidence.

/by