Details:

This is a Collaborative Learning Community (CLC) assignment.

An important role of nursing is to provide health promotion and disease prevention. Review the 2020 Topics and Objectives on the Healthy People website. Choose a topic of interest that you would like to address, in conjunction with a population at-risk for the associated topic. Submit the topic and associated group to your instructor for approval.

Create a 3 slide PowerPoint presentation for your topic and focus group. Include speaker notes and citations for each slide, and create a slide at the end for References.

Address the following:

1. Identify interdisciplinary health professionals important to include in the health promotion. What is their role? Why is their involvement significant?

Cite at least three peer-reviewed or scholarly sources to complete this assignment. Sources should be published within the last 5 years and appropriate for the assignment criteria and public health content.

Refer to the resource, “Creating Effective PowerPoint Presentations,” located in the Student Success Center, for additional guidance on completing this assignment in the appropriate style.

While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion. 

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.

CLC – Health Promotion and Community Resource Teaching Project   1Unsatisfactory0.00%2Less than Satisfactory75.00%3Satisfactory79.00%4Good89.00%5Excellent100.00%100.0 %Content 10.0 %Approved Topic, Associated Population and Health DisparityTopic and associated population selected is not approved; topic and associated population are not relevant to the scope of the assignment. Topic and associated population are omitted.Approved topic and associated population are partially presented. It is unclear how the topic adversely affects the selected population. Health disparities are partially described, or are not relevant to selected population. There are significant inaccuracies.Approved topic and associated population are summarized. A general correlation of how the topic adversely affects the selected population is presented. Relevant health disparities are summarized. There are some inaccuracies. More evidence or rationale is needed for support.Approved topic and associated population are described. A correlation of how the topic adversely affects the selected population is established and discussed. Relevant health disparities are discussed. There are minor inaccuracies. Some evidence or rationale is needed for support.Approved topic and associated population are thoroughly described. A strong correlation of how the topic adversely affects the selected population is established and discussed in detail. Relevant health disparities are clearly presented and discussed. Strong evidence and compelling rationale is offered for support.10.0 %Evidence-Based Approaches to Optimize Health for PopulationEvidence-based approaches to optimize health for this population are not presented.Evidence-based approaches to optimize health for this population are partially presented; some approaches presented are not evidence-based, or are not relevant for this population. Explanation of how these approaches minimize health disparity is incomplete, or are not relevant for the affected population. There are significant inaccuracies.Evidence-based approaches to optimize health for this population are summarized; it is unclear how some approaches presented are relevant for this population. A general explanation of how these approaches minimize health disparity is presented. There are some inaccuracies. More evidence or rationale is needed for support.Evidence-based approaches to optimize health for this population are discussed. Explanation of how these approaches minimize health disparity is presented. Some evidence or rationale is needed for support.Evidence-based approaches to optimize health for this population are discussed, and approaches are accurately represented and highly relevant to the population. Explanation of how these approaches minimize health disparity is well-developed. Strong evidence and rationale are provided throughout. An understanding of the importance of evidence-based approaches in the optimization of health for an at-risk population is demonstrated.10.0 %Proposal for Health Education for Family-Centered Health PromotionA proposal for health education for a family-centered health promotion to address the issue for the target population is omitted. The proposal is not supported by evidence-based practice.A proposal for health education for a family-centered health promotion to address the issue for the target population is partially presented. The proposal is not entirely relevant to the target population. The proposal requires more support relevant to evidence-based practice. There are significant inaccuracies.A proposal for health education for a family-centered health promotion to address the issue for the target population is presented. It is generally supported by evidence-based practice; there are some inaccuracies, or some areas need more support using evidence-based practice. Overall, the proposal is relevant to the target population. A proposal for health education for a family-centered health promotion to address the issue for the target population is presented. It is supported by evidence-based practice and relevant to the target population. There are minor inaccuracies.A well-developed proposal for health education for a family-centered health promotion to address the issue for the target population is presented. It is strongly supported by evidence-based practice and highly relevant to the target population. The ability to apply evidence-based practice to health education for a target population is clearly demonstrated.5.0 %Resources and Organizations for Proposed Education PlanResources and organizations to support the proposed education plan are omitted.One health-related organization for the selected topic is presented. The profile is incomplete, or it is unclear how the organization is relevant to the focus topic. Two resources (national or local) are presented. It is unclear how the resources are supposed to be used, or how the resources are relevant to the focus topic.A general profile for a health-related organization relevant to the selected topic is summarized. Two relevant resources (national or local) are presented, and there is a general explanation for how the resources are supposed to be used by the patient or provider.A general profile for a health-related organization relevant to the selected topic is presented. Two relevant resources (national or local) are presented, and there is an explanation for how the resources are supposed to be used by the patient or provider. A general profile for a health-related organization relevant to the selected topic is well presented. Two relevant resources (national or local) are presented, and there is a clear explanation for how the resources are supposed to be used by the patient or provider. 5.0 %Interdisciplinary Health Professional InvolvementInterdisciplinary health professionals important to the health promotion are not included.At least one significant interdisciplinary health professional is presented. It is unclear how the professional important to the health promotion, and what the role of the professional would be. Support for the suggested member is needed.Some significant interdisciplinary health professionals are presented. A summary of their role and importance to the health promotion is provided. Some support for the suggested members is needed.Key interdisciplinary health professionals are presented A discussion of their role and importance to the health promotion is provided. All significant interdisciplinary health professionals are presented. A clear discussion of their role and importance to the health promotion is provided.40.0 %Presentation of ContentThe content lacks a clear point of view and logical sequence of information. Includes little persuasive information. Sequencing of ideas is unclear.The content is vague in conveying a point of view and does not create a strong sense of purpose. Includes some persuasive information.The presentation slides are generally competent, but ideas may show some inconsistency in organization or in their relationships to each other.The content is written with a logical progression of ideas and supporting information exhibiting a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness. Includes persuasive information from reliable sources.The content is written clearly and concisely. Ideas universally progress and relate to each other. The project includes motivating questions and advanced organizers. The project gives the audience a clear sense of the main idea.5.0 %LayoutThe layout is cluttered, confusing, and does not use spacing, headings, and subheadings to enhance the readability. The text is extremely difficult to read with long blocks of text, small point size for fonts, and inappropriate contrasting colors. Poor use of headings, subheadings, indentations, or bold formatting is evident.The layout shows some structure, but appears cluttered and busy or distracting with large gaps of white space or a distracting background. Overall readability is difficult due to lengthy paragraphs, too many different fonts, dark or busy background, overuse of bold, or lack of appropriate indentations of text.The layout uses horizontal and vertical white space appropriately. Sometimes the fonts are easy to read, but in a few places the use of fonts, italics, bold, long paragraphs, color, or busy background detracts and does not enhance readability. The layout background and text complement each other and enable the content to be easily read. The fonts are easy to read and point size varies appropriately for headings and text.The layout is visually pleasing and contributes to the overall message with appropriate use of headings, subheadings, and white space. Text is appropriate in length for the target audience and to the point. The background and colors enhance the readability of the text.5.0 %Language Use and Audience Awareness (includes sentence construction, word choice, etc.)Inappropriate word choice and lack of variety in language use are evident. Writer appears to be unaware of audience. Use of primer prose indicates writer either does not apply figures of speech or uses them inappropriately.Some distracting inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. The writer exhibits some lack of control in using figures of speech appropriately. Language is appropriate to the targeted audience for the most part.The writer is clearly aware of audience, uses a variety of appropriate vocabulary for the targeted audience, and uses figures of speech to communicate clearly.The writer uses a variety of sentence constructions, figures of speech, and word choice in distinctive and creative ways that are appropriate to purpose, discipline, and scope.5.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)Slide errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning.Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader.Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader.Slides are largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present.Writer is clearly in control of standard, written, academic English.5.0 %Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)Sources are not documented.Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.100 %Total Weightage

Write a 4-5 page critical analysis of the major ideas and suggestions related to The Nature Fix.
Assignment details:
1. Include an Introduction of your topic with a purpose statement.
2. Provide evidence from 2 scholarly sources while thoroughly questioning and synthesizing the sources.
3. State your own opinions while taking into account the complexities of the issue.
4. Thoroughly analyze and reflect on your own and other’s assumptions and evaluate the relevance of contexts when presenting a position.
5. Reflect on the consequences and implications of the issue on today’s society and future generations.
6. State your own position statement related to The Nature Fix.
7. Use the Critical Thinking VALUE rubric to guide your thinking and reflection.
attachment
CriticalThinkingAssignment.pages
attachment
ScreenShot2020-11-08at11.16.20PM.png

Congressional Debate Packet: Part One:
                              Topic: PUBLIC COLLEGE SHOULD BE TUITION FREE.
Bill: For this part of your congressional debate assignment, you will choose a topic that you are passionate about and write a bill to change/modify current U.S. laws or policies concerning your topic. Use the template and example below to write your bill.
-Your Section 1 should be at least one complete sentence.
-Your Section 2 should include at least three definitions.
-Your Section 3 should reference a legitimate government agency and SPECIFY the ways they will enforce your bill.
-Your Section 4 should include a specific date and time frame.
-Your Section 5 should be exactly phrased: “All laws in conflict with this legislation are hereby declared null and void.”
 

2. Author’s Speech: Write an author’s speech defending your bill using specific research that lasts 3 minutes when spoken aloud.

FURTHER DIRECTIONS, TEMPLATES, AND EXAMPLES ON NEXT PAGE
 
Bill Template:
A Bill to [Action Word] [Object] [Preposition] [Summarize the Solution Specifically]
 
BE IT ENACTED BY THE CONGRESS HERE ASSEMBLED THAT:
SECTION 1.   State the new policy in a brief declarative sentence, or in as few sentences as possible.
SECTION 2.   Define any ambiguous terms inherent in the first section.
SECTION 3.   Name the government agency that will oversee the enforcement of the bill along with the specific enforcement mechanism.
SECTION 4.   Indicate the implementation date/timeframe.
SECTION 5.   All laws in conflict with this legislation are hereby declared null and void.
Bill Example:
A Bill to Promote Green Energy by Providing Federal Tax Credits to Small Businesses Using Green Energy Sources
 
BE IT ENACTED BY THE CONGRESS HERE ASSEMBLED THAT:
SECTION 1.   This bill shall grant Federal tax credits to small businesses that use alternative, green sources of
energy.
SECTION 2.   Small Business: a “small business” is defined by the United States Small Business Administration Office of Advocacy as an independent business having fewer than 500 employees.
Green Energy: “green energy” is defied by the United States Environmental Protection agency as electricity supplied from the following renewable sources of power: solar, geothermal, biomass, landfill gas, hydro, and wind.
Tax Credits: A tax credit is a type of tax incentive that can reduce the amount of money a taxpayer owes the government. Unlike a tax deduction, which reduces taxable income, a taxpayer can subtract a tax credit from the amount of taxes they owe, lowering their tax liability dollar-for-dollar.
SECTION 3.   The Department of Energy will oversee this measure by assessing whether the small businesses’ energy practices are “Green Energy”, then by referring the business to the Internal Revenue Service for a federal tax credit.
SECTION 4.   This bill shall go into effect by the new fiscal year of 2020 (October 1, 2020).
SECTION 5.   All laws in conflict with this legislation are hereby declared null and void.
Author’s Speech Outline: 
 

1. Introduction (15 to 30 seconds)
   1. Relate the speech to ideas that are, or might be, brought to the floor for debate.

1. 1. 1. Use a quotation; and/or
      2. Use an analogy; and/or
      3. Use statistics to raise awareness of a problem

1. State purpose/thesis (about 10 seconds)

1. Body (approximately 2 minutes)

Each claim you make (whether constructive or refuting the opposition) should be supported with analytical reasoning and/or evidence with a good combination of quantitative statistics or facts, and qualitative case studies and quotations from experts. Be sure to state the importance, or impact that claim has for the overall topic of debate and why it supports or opposes those views. Example structure:

1. Claim: issue of debate; point or points that are in conflict.
2. Proof: evidence and reasoning to support the argument; explain how the proof relates to the claim (link).
3. Impact: why the argument is important/significant, especially to the particular side debated. Challenge the opposition to respond to an issue. Give two to three meaningful arguments.

1. Conclusion (about 30 seconds)

1. State primary points and issues
2. Summarize key arguments

Details:

This is a Collaborative Learning Community (CLC) assignment.

It is important to promote the professional role of the nurse to provide health promotion and disease preventive care. Collaborating with other health care professionals and consumer groups in the community in redesigning health care can help meet the goals for Healthy People 2020.

Refer to http://www.healthypeople.gov/ to open the Healthy People 2020 home page.

Select the”Topics & Objectives” tab to access the 2020 Topics & Objectives – Objectives A-Z page. Select one of the Healthy People “Topic Areas” for improving health. Submit the proposed area to the instructor for approval. No group may work on the same focus area as another group.

Develop a PowerPoint presentation (15-20 slides) with accompanying speaker’s notes and citations.

For help designing PowerPoint slides, refer to the “Create Your First Presentation” PowerPoint tutorial, located on the Microsoft website:

In the presentation, address the following:

State the objective of the presentation. State the Healthy People 2020 focus area your group has selected and the rationale for selection of the specific focus area. Explain how the focus area relates to the individual, the family, and the community, as well as to all age groups throughout the life span. Identify ways to enhance or optimize health in the selected focus area using evidence-based research. A minimum of three peer-reviewed articles must be utilized. Address the health disparity among different segments of the population for the selected focus area. Provide a brief description of at least two community resources and at least two website resources for professionals and clients. Provide a brief profile of at least one health-related organization for the selected focus area.

APA format is required for essays only. Solid academic writing is always expected. For all assignment delivery options, documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.