PROJ6004 Assessment 2 Brief .docx Page 1 of 7
ASSESSMENT BRIEF – Assessment 2
Subject Code and Title PROJ6004: Contracts and Procurement
Assessment Assessment 2: Contracts and Procurement Review of the case study and associated Learning Resources, including detailed analysis of findings.
Individual/Group Individual Report
Length 2400 words
Learning Outcomes 1. Critically evaluate the risks associated
with contract and procurement
management approaches and make
recommendations to global project
sponsors with regard to ‘best practice’ in
this area.
2. Apply judgement and initiative in the
development of ‘best practice’ contract and
procurement process for global project
management, identifying the external factors
that need to be considered and mitigated for
in every instance.
3. Analyse the responsibilities of the
procurement manager and project manager
necessary to ensure stakeholder satisfaction
and successful project outcomes. Submission By 11:55pm end of Module 4
Weighting 40% There are 3 parts to Assessment 2
Total Marks 40 marks
PROJ6004 Assessment 2 Brief .docx Page 2 of 7
Context: General
Procurement and contracts are integral to successful project management. Planning for
purchases and acquisitions, requests for proposal, vendor selection, contract
administration, and contract closure are integral parts of the process. Learning from case
studies and benchmarking against better practices, standards and excellence is vital to
understand complexity of issues and successful strategies for procurement and contract
management. It will also ensure improved responsiveness to key issues, promote supplier-
client relationships through proactive management of risks and ultimately deliver higher
level of focus on performance-based outcomes.
Specific (Assessment 2 Context)
Assessment 2 is about uncovering complexities in the procurement context generally,
identifying key issues, looking at leadership, governance and key themes that will allow
improved focus, and learning.
Assessment 2 is based on understanding the case study and other module Learning
Resources.
Students are encouraged to look at the Essential and Highly Recommended Learning
Resources and other public documents associated with the case study.
However, a careful thorough review of the report is required to understand the
contracts and procurement issues that have arisen during the project execution,
ongoing risks mitigations and lessons learnt that can be applied to other large
infrastructure projects.
Assessment 2 aims to encourage a deeper understanding of the challenges faced in large
complex projects – particularly with procurement methods that involve private-sector
finance to deliver complex projects – which is a significant method of procurement
because it can mobilise global financial and procurement capability to innovatively build
public infrastructure and facilities to meet the needs of the growing population.
Students are also encouraged to understand and explore the related organisational
issues, stakeholders and the funding and finance aspects associated with the project.
PROJ6004 Assessment 2 Brief .docx Page 3 of 7
Instructions:
Assessment 2 Individual Report (overall 2,400 Words) is designed around analyzing the
procurement in the case study project. This assessment comprises of three parts:
Part A: Introduce and summarise the procurement context and scope (life cycle journey
of the case study project). Identify the project procurement components and tender
evaluation that may have been used in the case study (according to your knowledge
from the theory you have studied).
Part B: Describe the complexities (and key issues/risks), discuss the project environment
and organisation aspects, leadership and governance and how these have influenced
outcomes.
Part C: Identify or suggest key mitigations and possible learnings. Explain how those
learnings may require changes to roles and responsibilities of key project resources,
changes to procurement briefs or specifications, scope and the procurement process
itself. Identify dependencies and common themes.
Learning Activities and Output:
The learning process will involve the deconstruction of the case study material to answer
questions, examine lessons learnt and highlight issues for further discussion. You will be
encouraged to reflect on your case study findings in order to identify contracts and
procurement management best practices which can be applied in the future to significant
projects that you may lead as project manager or oversee in a senior role.
PROJ6004 Assessment 2 Brief .docx Page 4 of 7
Learning Resources:
Resource on APA style:
The URL/page for the TUA referencing guides is
http://onlinelibrary.tua.edu.au/skills/referencing
Resource on report writing:
Victoria University of Wellington (2013). How to write a business report. School of
Marketing and Internal Business and Student Learning Support Service, Wellington,
New Zealand.
http://www.victoria.ac.nz/vbs/teaching/publications/VBS-report-writing-guide-
2013-July.pdf
Resource on writing case study reports
Monash University (2015). Case study report (sample). Learning Support, Language
and Learning Online, Melbourne, Australia.
http://www.monash.edu.au/lls/llonline/writing/general/report/1.xml
Refer to the subject planner and Modules readings for other learning
resources specific to Assessment 2.
Assessment Criteria:
Assessment 2 (Parts A, B, C) Individual Report (40%)
Content, audience and purpose (30%)
Knowledge and understanding (30%)
Correct citation of key resources and evidence (20%)
Effective communication (20%)
The Reflection Journal will also be assessed and has a weight of 10% out of 40%. In addition,
students may wish to consider that the audience for the Reflection Journal is the Learning
Facilitator and or the student’s employer or sponsor. Therefore, effective communication of
ideas is vital recognising the audience too. See learning rubrics in the following pages for
details.
PROJ6004 Assessment 2 Brief 2019.docx Page 5 of 7
Learning Rubrics –Assessment 2 (Part A, B, C)
Assessment Attributes
Fail (0-49)
Pass (50-64)
Credit (65-74)
Distinction (75-84)
High Distinction (85-100)
Content, Audience and Purpose
(30%)
Does not meet minimum standard
Demonstrates no awareness of context and/or purpose of the assignment.
Meets minimum standard
Demonstrates limited awareness of context and/or purpose of the assignment
Moves beyond minimum standard
Demonstrates consistent awareness of context and/or purpose of the assignment.
Exceeds minimum standard
Demonstrates an advanced and integrated understanding of context and/or purpose of the assignment.
Exceeds minimum standard and exhibits high levels of independence
Consistently demonstrates a systematic and critical understanding of context and purpose of the assignment.
Knowledge and understanding
(30%)
Limited understanding of required concepts and knowledge
Key components of the assignment are not addressed.
Knowledge or understanding of the field or discipline.
Resembles a recall or summary of key ideas.
Often conflates/confuses assertion of personal opinion with information substantiated by evidence from the
Thorough knowledge or understanding of the field or discipline/s. Supports personal opinion and information substantiated by evidence from the research/course materials.
Demonstrates a capacity to explain and apply relevant concepts.
Highly developed understanding of the field or discipline/s.
Discriminates between assertion of personal opinion and information substantiated by robust evidence from the research/course materials and extended reading.
A sophisticated understanding of the field or discipline/s.
Systematically and critically discriminates between assertion of personal opinion and information substantiated by robust evidence from the research/course materials and extended reading.
PROJ6004 Assessment 2 Brief 2019.docx Page 6 of 7
research/course materials.
Well demonstrated capacity to explain and apply relevant concepts.
Mastery of concepts and application to new situations/further learning.
Correct citation of key resources and evidence
(20%)
Demonstrates inconsistent use of good quality, credible and relevant resources to support and develop ideas.
There are mistakes in using the APA style.
Demonstrates use of credible and relevant resources to support and develop ideas, but these are not always explicit or well developed.
There are no mistakes in using the APA style.
Demonstrates use of high quality, credible and relevant resources to support and develop ideas.
There are no mistakes in using the APA style.
Demonstrates use of good quality, credible and relevant resources to support and develop arguments and statements. Shows evidence of wide scope within the organisation for sourcing evidence
There are no mistakes in using the APA style.
Demonstrates use of high-quality, credible and relevant resources to support and develop arguments and position statements. Shows evidence of wide scope within and without the organisation for sourcing evidence
There are no mistakes in using the APA style.
Effective communication
(20%)
Difficult to understand for audience, no logical/clear structure, poor flow of ideas, argument lacks supporting evidence.
No effort is made to keep audience engaged, audience
Information, arguments and evidence are presented in a way that is not always clear and logical.
Attempts are made to keep the audience engaged, but not
Information, arguments and evidence are well presented, mostly clear flow of ideas and arguments.
The audience is mostly engaged, line of
Information, arguments and evidence are very well presented, the presentation is logical, clear and well supported by evidence.
Expertly presented; the presentation is logical, persuasive, and well supported by evidence, demonstrating a clear flow of ideas and arguments.
PROJ6004 Assessment 2 Brief 2019.docx Page 7 of 7
cannot follow the line of reasoning.
Little use of presentation aids, or the presentation aids and material used are irrelevant.
always successful. Line of reasoning is often difficult to follow.
Presentation aids are used more for effect than relevance.
reasoning is easy to follow.
Effective use of presentation aids.
Engages the audience, demonstrates cultural sensitivity.
Carefully and well prepared presentations aids are used.
Engages and sustains audience’s interest in the topic, demonstrates high levels of cultural sensitivity
Effective use of diverse presentation aids, including graphics and multi-media.
Describe how your experiences in advocating for individuals, families, and/or communities could help you to engage in advocacy in the political arena.
Nursing Essay HelpIn this week’s presentation, we mentioned the transfer of advocacy from clinical nursing to the political arena. In your response to this posting, complete the following. 1. 1. Compare the roles and responsibilities of the nurse in advocating for safe care for individuals, for families, and for communities. Describe how your experiences in advocating for individuals, families, and/or communities could help you to engage in advocacy in the political arena. 2. Identify a situation in which you have observed unsafe, illegal, or unethical care practices in your work environment. Describe how you could have used political advocacy to correct these practices. 3. Develop an educational campaign for community dwelling elderly about safe sex practices ]]>
Economics homework help
UncategorizedA Case Analysis of Uber
Uber is a ride-sharing service started in 2009. If you are not familiar with Uber, you can learn more about the services it provides at Uber.com.
Construct an eight-page analysis of Uber using the following criteria.
· Analyze the market before Uber’s entry. Describe the inefficiency Uber exploited.
· Explain Uber’s surge pricing in the context of shifts in supply and demand.
· Evaluate Uber’s surge pricing in the context of price discrimination.
· Apply the concepts of economies of scale and economies of scope to Uber’s business model.
· Apply the concepts of game theory to Uber’s market.
· Assess Uber’s potential for international expansion and potential trade policy issues.
· Explain the incentive pay model Uber uses and how it affects the principal-agent problem.
· Discuss any asymmetric information issues with Uber’s business model.
Your essay must be at least eight pages in length (not counting the title and references pages) and include at least five peer-reviewed resources. Adhere to APA Style when writing your analysis, including citations and references for sources used. Be sure to include an introduction. Please note that no abstract is needed
Text book for assignment is Froeb, L. M., McCann, B. T., Shor, M., & Ward, M. R. (2018). Managerial economics (5th ed.). Cengage Learning. https://online.vitalsource.com/#/books/9781337468015
Uber is a ride
–
sharing service started in
2009. If you are not familiar with Uber, you can learn more
about the services it provides at Uber.com.
Construct an eight
–
page analysis of Uber using the following criteria.
·
Analyze the mar
ket before Uber’s entry. Describe the inefficiency Uber exploited.
·
Explain Uber’s surge pricing in the context of shifts in supply and demand.
·
Evaluate Uber’s surge pricing in the context of price discrimination.
·
Apply the concepts of economies of scale an
d economies of scope to Uber’s business model.
·
Apply the concepts
of game theory to Uber’s market.
·
Assess Uber’s potential for international expansion and potential trade policy issues.
·
Explain the incentive pay model Uber uses and how it affects the princ
ipal
–
agent problem.
·
Discuss any asymmetric information issues with
Uber’s business model.
Your essay must be
at least
eight pages in length (not counting the title and references pages) and
include at least five peer
–
reviewed resources. Adhere to APA Style
when writing your analysis, including
citations and references fo
r sources used. Be sure to include an introduction. Please note that no
abstract is needed
Text book
for assignment is
Froeb, L. M., McCann, B. T., Shor, M., & Ward, M. R. (2018).
Managerial
economics
(5th ed.). Cengage Lear
ning. https://online.vitalsource.com/#/books/9781337468015
A Case Analysis of Uber
Uber is a ride-sharing service started in 2009. If you are not familiar with Uber, you can learn more
about the services it provides at Uber.com.
Construct an eight-page analysis of Uber using the following criteria.
Analyze the market before Uber’s entry. Describe the inefficiency Uber exploited.
Explain Uber’s surge pricing in the context of shifts in supply and demand.
Evaluate Uber’s surge pricing in the context of price discrimination.
Apply the concepts of economies of scale and economies of scope to Uber’s business model.
Apply the concepts of game theory to Uber’s market.
Assess Uber’s potential for international expansion and potential trade policy issues.
Explain the incentive pay model Uber uses and how it affects the principal-agent problem.
Discuss any asymmetric information issues with Uber’s business model.
Your essay must be at least eight pages in length (not counting the title and references pages) and
include at least five peer-reviewed resources. Adhere to APA Style when writing your analysis, including
citations and references for sources used. Be sure to include an introduction. Please note that no
abstract is needed
Text book for assignment is Froeb, L. M., McCann, B. T., Shor, M., & Ward, M. R. (2018). Managerial
economics (5th ed.). Cengage Learning. https://online.vitalsource.com/#/books/9781337468015
Management homework help
UncategorizedASSESSMENT BRIEF – Assessment 2
Subject Code and Title PROJ6004: Contracts and Procurement
Assessment Assessment 2: Contracts and Procurement Review of the case study and associated Learning Resources, including detailed analysis of findings.
Individual/Group Individual Report
Length 2400 words
Learning Outcomes 1. Critically evaluate the risks associated
with contract and procurement
management approaches and make
recommendations to global project
sponsors with regard to ‘best practice’ in
this area.
2. Apply judgement and initiative in the
development of ‘best practice’ contract and
procurement process for global project
management, identifying the external factors
that need to be considered and mitigated for
in every instance.
3. Analyse the responsibilities of the
procurement manager and project manager
necessary to ensure stakeholder satisfaction
and successful project outcomes. Submission By 11:55pm end of Module 4
Weighting 40% There are 3 parts to Assessment 2
Total Marks 40 marks
PROJ6004 Assessment 2 Brief .docx Page 2 of 7
Context: General
Procurement and contracts are integral to successful project management. Planning for
purchases and acquisitions, requests for proposal, vendor selection, contract
administration, and contract closure are integral parts of the process. Learning from case
studies and benchmarking against better practices, standards and excellence is vital to
understand complexity of issues and successful strategies for procurement and contract
management. It will also ensure improved responsiveness to key issues, promote supplier-
client relationships through proactive management of risks and ultimately deliver higher
level of focus on performance-based outcomes.
Specific (Assessment 2 Context)
Assessment 2 is about uncovering complexities in the procurement context generally,
identifying key issues, looking at leadership, governance and key themes that will allow
improved focus, and learning.
Assessment 2 is based on understanding the case study and other module Learning
Resources.
Students are encouraged to look at the Essential and Highly Recommended Learning
Resources and other public documents associated with the case study.
However, a careful thorough review of the report is required to understand the
contracts and procurement issues that have arisen during the project execution,
ongoing risks mitigations and lessons learnt that can be applied to other large
infrastructure projects.
Assessment 2 aims to encourage a deeper understanding of the challenges faced in large
complex projects – particularly with procurement methods that involve private-sector
finance to deliver complex projects – which is a significant method of procurement
because it can mobilise global financial and procurement capability to innovatively build
public infrastructure and facilities to meet the needs of the growing population.
Students are also encouraged to understand and explore the related organisational
issues, stakeholders and the funding and finance aspects associated with the project.
PROJ6004 Assessment 2 Brief .docx Page 3 of 7
Instructions:
Assessment 2 Individual Report (overall 2,400 Words) is designed around analyzing the
procurement in the case study project. This assessment comprises of three parts:
Part A: Introduce and summarise the procurement context and scope (life cycle journey
of the case study project). Identify the project procurement components and tender
evaluation that may have been used in the case study (according to your knowledge
from the theory you have studied).
Part B: Describe the complexities (and key issues/risks), discuss the project environment
and organisation aspects, leadership and governance and how these have influenced
outcomes.
Part C: Identify or suggest key mitigations and possible learnings. Explain how those
learnings may require changes to roles and responsibilities of key project resources,
changes to procurement briefs or specifications, scope and the procurement process
itself. Identify dependencies and common themes.
Learning Activities and Output:
The learning process will involve the deconstruction of the case study material to answer
questions, examine lessons learnt and highlight issues for further discussion. You will be
encouraged to reflect on your case study findings in order to identify contracts and
procurement management best practices which can be applied in the future to significant
projects that you may lead as project manager or oversee in a senior role.
PROJ6004 Assessment 2 Brief .docx Page 4 of 7
Learning Resources:
Resource on APA style:
The URL/page for the TUA referencing guides is
http://onlinelibrary.tua.edu.au/skills/referencing
Resource on report writing:
Victoria University of Wellington (2013). How to write a business report. School of
Marketing and Internal Business and Student Learning Support Service, Wellington,
New Zealand.
http://www.victoria.ac.nz/vbs/teaching/publications/VBS-report-writing-guide-
2013-July.pdf
Resource on writing case study reports
Monash University (2015). Case study report (sample). Learning Support, Language
and Learning Online, Melbourne, Australia.
http://www.monash.edu.au/lls/llonline/writing/general/report/1.xml
Refer to the subject planner and Modules readings for other learning
resources specific to Assessment 2.
Assessment Criteria:
Assessment 2 (Parts A, B, C) Individual Report (40%)
Content, audience and purpose (30%)
Knowledge and understanding (30%)
Correct citation of key resources and evidence (20%)
Effective communication (20%)
The Reflection Journal will also be assessed and has a weight of 10% out of 40%. In addition,
students may wish to consider that the audience for the Reflection Journal is the Learning
Facilitator and or the student’s employer or sponsor. Therefore, effective communication of
ideas is vital recognising the audience too. See learning rubrics in the following pages for
details.
PROJ6004 Assessment 2 Brief 2019.docx Page 5 of 7
Learning Rubrics –Assessment 2 (Part A, B, C)
Assessment Attributes
Fail (0-49)
Pass (50-64)
Credit (65-74)
Distinction (75-84)
High Distinction (85-100)
Content, Audience and Purpose
(30%)
Does not meet minimum standard
Demonstrates no awareness of context and/or purpose of the assignment.
Meets minimum standard
Demonstrates limited awareness of context and/or purpose of the assignment
Moves beyond minimum standard
Demonstrates consistent awareness of context and/or purpose of the assignment.
Exceeds minimum standard
Demonstrates an advanced and integrated understanding of context and/or purpose of the assignment.
Exceeds minimum standard and exhibits high levels of independence
Consistently demonstrates a systematic and critical understanding of context and purpose of the assignment.
Knowledge and understanding
(30%)
Limited understanding of required concepts and knowledge
Key components of the assignment are not addressed.
Knowledge or understanding of the field or discipline.
Resembles a recall or summary of key ideas.
Often conflates/confuses assertion of personal opinion with information substantiated by evidence from the
Thorough knowledge or understanding of the field or discipline/s. Supports personal opinion and information substantiated by evidence from the research/course materials.
Demonstrates a capacity to explain and apply relevant concepts.
Highly developed understanding of the field or discipline/s.
Discriminates between assertion of personal opinion and information substantiated by robust evidence from the research/course materials and extended reading.
A sophisticated understanding of the field or discipline/s.
Systematically and critically discriminates between assertion of personal opinion and information substantiated by robust evidence from the research/course materials and extended reading.
PROJ6004 Assessment 2 Brief 2019.docx Page 6 of 7
research/course materials.
Well demonstrated capacity to explain and apply relevant concepts.
Mastery of concepts and application to new situations/further learning.
Correct citation of key resources and evidence
(20%)
Demonstrates inconsistent use of good quality, credible and relevant resources to support and develop ideas.
There are mistakes in using the APA style.
Demonstrates use of credible and relevant resources to support and develop ideas, but these are not always explicit or well developed.
There are no mistakes in using the APA style.
Demonstrates use of high quality, credible and relevant resources to support and develop ideas.
There are no mistakes in using the APA style.
Demonstrates use of good quality, credible and relevant resources to support and develop arguments and statements. Shows evidence of wide scope within the organisation for sourcing evidence
There are no mistakes in using the APA style.
Demonstrates use of high-quality, credible and relevant resources to support and develop arguments and position statements. Shows evidence of wide scope within and without the organisation for sourcing evidence
There are no mistakes in using the APA style.
Effective communication
(20%)
Difficult to understand for audience, no logical/clear structure, poor flow of ideas, argument lacks supporting evidence.
No effort is made to keep audience engaged, audience
Information, arguments and evidence are presented in a way that is not always clear and logical.
Attempts are made to keep the audience engaged, but not
Information, arguments and evidence are well presented, mostly clear flow of ideas and arguments.
The audience is mostly engaged, line of
Information, arguments and evidence are very well presented, the presentation is logical, clear and well supported by evidence.
Expertly presented; the presentation is logical, persuasive, and well supported by evidence, demonstrating a clear flow of ideas and arguments.
PROJ6004 Assessment 2 Brief 2019.docx Page 7 of 7
cannot follow the line of reasoning.
Little use of presentation aids, or the presentation aids and material used are irrelevant.
always successful. Line of reasoning is often difficult to follow.
Presentation aids are used more for effect than relevance.
reasoning is easy to follow.
Effective use of presentation aids.
Engages the audience, demonstrates cultural sensitivity.
Carefully and well prepared presentations aids are used.
Engages and sustains audience’s interest in the topic, demonstrates high levels of cultural sensitivity
Effective use of diverse presentation aids, including graphics and multi-media.
Social Science homework help
Uncategorized1. A theoretical orientation of the student’s choice, which will influence the assessment of a particular case (individual or family).
2. As part of the assessment, the paper should include an ecomap and genogram.
3. This case description will include explanations of the impact of ethnicity, race, gender, aging and social class. (Short/mini psychosocial).
4. A description of the role of social work values and ethics in relationship to this particular case.
5. An explanation of the ecological perspective (person in environment) and how it defines this case.
6. An application of the problem-solving process using an empowerment and strengths perspective to this case.
7. A discussion of theory and its impact on the case.
8. A discussion of issues regarding populations at risk and human rights.
9. References from the literature to support the theory base for both assessment and intervention.
10. References from the literature to support the issues of values and ethics in social work practice.
11. References from the literature to support the incorporation of issues related to human rights and social justice.
Sexual Health Promotion Strategy
Nursing HomeworksShort Paper- Sexual Health Promotion Strategy
IHP 323 Health Promotion Activity Rubric
Requirements of Submission: Short paper assignments must follow these formatting guidelines: double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, one-inch margins, and discipline-appropriate citations. Page length requirements: 3–4 pages.
2.5
2.2
2
(Mechanics/Citations)
>Management homework help
UncategorizedIn order to accomplish everything that the CEO wants, she has agreed to let you do substantial research into companies that have failed and succeeded, and use those companies as a guide. She needs options. She needs reasons why each option may succeed or fail. She must present to the Board of Directors and needs real answers from you.
Do your research and design a report and presentation to present to the CEO and other executives.
Research Companies that have gone public. Begin with Google.
Evaluating Nutrition Information
Nursing HomeworksDiscussion 1: Evaluating Nutrition Information
For this discussion, conduct an internet search for a nutrition question that interests you. It could be about a particular food or a diet or how food might be beneficial for certain conditions. Choose an article from your “search”. Then evaluate the article based on the following criteria:
In your discussion post provide the question you asked in your search, the title of the article you chose, the link to the article, and a brief summary and explanation of your perception of the validity and credibility of the information you found. Your response should be at least 250 words.
After posting your response, read the responses of your classmates and respond to at least one in 150 words.
CASE STUDY ON WOMAN WITH TYPE II DIABETES
UncategorizedCase Study
A 60 year old woman with a 10 year history of Type II diabetes presents with multiple complications including retinopathy, peripheral neuropathy and declining renal function.
She has not had the urge to eat as of recently she feels “full” after a few bites. The incidence of nausea and feeling bloated occurs at least twice a day and even after a glass of water she feels bloated. She also complains of fatigue and not been able to keep up with daily chores.
A radiographic gastric emptying study shows a prolonged gastric emptying time.
Assignment Questions
Instructions
DISCUSS THE SIGNIFICANCE OF SOCIAL STRUCTURES ON HEALTH AND ILLNESS.
UncategorizedDiscussed the significance of social structures on health and illness. In the newest version of the DSM, the following disorders (but not limited to) have been either included for the first time or modified: Bereavement Exclusion (removal from Depression), Internet Gaming Disorder, Hoarding Disorder, and Gender Dysphoria. Selectoneof the disorders. In one to two double-spaced pages, briefly discuss the selected diagnosis (You can start here: http://www.dsm5.org/Pages/Default.aspx The box on the bottom right has diagnoses that have changed) and talk about the implications of the medicalization of the diagnosis. Remember we’re focusing on medicalization; not necessarily on how the disorder affects people per se, but on how changing what is considered a medical problem or not affects people.Talk about the implications of the medicalization of the diagnosis. For example, which social group(s) might be more or less likely to be diagnosed with this based on these new criteria? What are the social consequences and the social benefits of having the condition medicalized in this way? What would a cure look like in terms of how you would expect the person to behave or feel once s/he is cured?
compare and contrast the health status of the minority group you have selected to the national average.
Nursing Essay Help