CJ 510 Final Project Guidelines and Rubric
Overview Criminal justice professionals are asked to serve the public with professionalism and fairness. Regardless of crimes committed by a suspect, the suspect must be treated respectfully and ethically. Leaders are expected to be able to take command of tragedies and major incidents. Administrators must walk a fine line to keep the public informed and their subordinates safe. It takes a true leader to be able to gain the trust of the community and the criminal justice professionals that serve under that particular leader. In order to achieve the qualities of a true leader, one must be able to approach problem situations effectively and address problems ethically and appropriately for all parties involved.
The final project in this course will expose you to a problem situation and task you with how it should be solved. You will imagine you are employed at a criminal justice organization facing a communal problem. Your superior at the organization has asked you to review the problem situation and offer your recommendations. You will be given the chance to evaluate the situation and develop suggestions that will inform development of strategies to address the issue using appropriate ethical and transparent leadership and communication skills. It is important to be able to recognize what leadership style you may be using and if that style will be effective in dealing with an issue at hand. This project will give you the experience and tools necessary to address problem situations and effectively lead both your subordinates and the parties involved while also coordinating with your superiors.
The final project for this course is the creation of a problem analysis with recommendations report. The final product represents an authentic demonstration of competency because it requires you to apply leadership concepts and ethical decision-making regarding decisions that will affect numerous stakeholders. The stakeholders include your law enforcement organization, a community, and many others such as political leaders and government officials. The project is supported by four milestones, which will be submitted at various points throughout the course to scaffold learning and ensure quality final submissions. These milestones will be submitted in Modules One, Three, Five, and Seven. The final product will be submitted in Module Nine.
In this assignment, you will demonstrate your mastery of the following course outcomes:
Analyze leadership dynamics and approaches used within criminal justice organizations for determining appropriate leadership styles that address communal problems
Determine the potential impact of the ethical decision-making of leadership on the operations of employees and the organizational culture within criminal justice agencies
Evaluate the ethical decision-making of leadership in criminal justice organizations based on accepted best practices and appropriate research Recommend strategies for fostering growth and trust between and within communities and criminal justice organizations Make recommendations for overcoming obstacles for implementing new strategies to internal and external key stakeholders in criminal justice
organizations
Prompt For the final project, imagine you are a professional working in a criminal justice organization. Your superior has asked your opinion on a problem facing the community. You will be given a basic scenario detailing a department of the organization that is trying to address a communal problem. You will complete a report explaining the problem facing the community and offering any recommendations and strategies you believe could effectively address the problem.
You will select one of the following case studies to analyze for your final project. To access the case studies, refer to the Harvard Business Review Coursepack Module:
1. NYPD New 2. The Flawed Emergency Response to the 1992 Los Angeles Riots
Specifically, the following critical elements must be addressed:
I. Introduction A. Describe the organization based on the information provided in the chosen scenario and explain the communal problem that they are trying to
address. B. Describe budgetary constraints and other potential obstacles that might impact the organization in addressing the problem from the agency and
community standpoint. C. Analyze and describe the current research in the field that would help leadership ethically address the issue and base their decisions on best
practices of the field.
II. Leadership Analysis A. Analyze the actions of leadership in the chosen scenario for how they did or did not facilitate and motivate employees in addressing the
problem. Be sure to provide examples from the scenario to support your response. What instances in the chosen scenario exemplify the approach of leadership in encouraging and interacting with employees?
B. Analyze the actions of leadership in the chosen scenario for communication issues that might arise and how these issues might impede addressing the problem. Be sure to provide examples from the scenario to support your response. What communication issues might leadership face when addressing this problem? What are the implications or consequences of these issues?
C. Determine whether the supervisors in the chosen scenario have functioned as effective leaders. Be sure to justify your response and support your response with appropriate research from the field gathered in your previous review.
III. Analysis of Ethics A. Determine the ethicality of leadership’s decision making during their attempts to address the problem. Be sure to justify your response and
support your response with appropriate research from the field gathered in your previous review.
B. Evaluate the transparency of the organization in regard to public communications. Be sure to justify your response. For example, are systems in place to communicate with the public? Has the organization been readily available and willing to provide the community with information regarding the problem?
C. Evaluate how leadership of the organization considered the ethical concerns of the community in addressing the problem. Be sure to justify your response. For example, how were the concerns of internal and external stakeholders considered?
D. Determine how the ethical decisions of leadership may impact the performance of employees in addressing the problem. How might these decisions improve employees’ ability to address the problem? How might they hinder their ability to address the problem?
E. Determine how the ethical decisions of leadership may impact the culture of the organization. For example, what if employees do not agree with the decisions?
F. Explain the overall implications of the ethical decision-making of leadership and how that affects the organization and the community. Be sure to justify your response, and support your response with appropriate research from the field gathered in your previous review.
IV. Recommendations A. Recommend an appropriate and effective leadership style that superiors at the organization could employ to address the problem and best fit
the organization based on your previous analysis. Be sure to justify your response. B. Make recommendations to leadership for resolving the situation that balance the needs of the community, effectively addressing the problem,
and what is ethically appropriate. How should leadership balance these three important elements in addressing the problem? C. Recommend strategies or actions that leadership could take to improve community relations and foster growth and trust between the
community and the organization in response to the problem from the chosen scenario. Be sure to justify your response and support your response with appropriate research from the field gathered in your previous review.
D. Recommend strategies or actions that leadership could take to maintain and improve the culture of the organization in response to the ethical decisions of leadership regarding the problem from the chosen scenario. Be sure to justify your response and support your response with appropriate research from the field gathered in your previous review.
E. Make recommendations for the organization on how they could account for obstacles that might impede the organization in addressing the problem and implementing your recommendations.
F. Explain how the organization could implement and uphold your recommendations. For example, should they enact new policies? Training? G. Explain how the organization would consider any budgetary constraints they might face both in addressing the problem and implementing any
of your recommendations.
Milestones Milestone One: Case Study Selection In Module One, you will submit the case study that you have selected to complete your final project on. Review the final project and then the two case study options. You will post your case study selection in a journal assignment. This milestone will be graded with the Milestone One Rubric.
Milestone Two: Leadership Analysis In Module Three, you will submit your leadership analysis. You will analyze how leadership acted in your selected case study in regard to how they facilitated or motivated employees, what communication issues might affect how they addressed the problem, and whether or not the supervisors in your selected case study functioned as effective leaders. This milestone will be graded with the Milestone Two Rubric.
Milestone Three: Analysis of Ethics In Module Five, you will submit an analysis of ethics. You will analyze your selected case study for the ethics that were used to address the problem. You will evaluate how leadership addressed the problem and whether they used ethical decision-making. This milestone will be graded with the Milestone Three Rubric.
Milestone Four: Recommendations In Module Seven, you will submit recommendations. You will use your previous analysis of the leadership and ethics and recommend strategies to help improve the organization’s use of ethical decision-making, the overall culture of the organization, and their relationship with the community. You will then identify obstacles that might occur when the plan is being implemented and strategies to help the organization implement and uphold your recommendations. This milestone will be graded with the Milestone Four Rubric.
Final Submission: Problem Analysis With Recommendations Report In Module Nine, you will submit your final project. It should be a complete, polished artifact containing all of the critical elements of the final product. It should reflect the incorporation of feedback gained throughout the course. This submission will be graded with the Final Project Rubric.
Deliverables
Milestone Deliverable Module Due Grading
One Case Study Selection One Graded separately; Milestone One Rubric
Two Leadership Analysis Three Graded separately; Milestone Two Rubric
Three Analysis of Ethics Five Graded separately; Milestone Three Rubric
Four Recommendations Seven Graded separately; Milestone Four Rubric
Final Submission: Problem Analysis With Recommendations Report
Nine Graded separately; Final Project Rubric
Final Project Rubric Guidelines for Submission: Your problem analysis should be 6–8 pages in 12-point Times New Roman font, double-spaced, following appropriate APA formatting.
Critical Elements Exemplary Proficient Needs Improvement Not Evident Value
Introduction: Problem
Describes the organization based on the information provided in the chosen scenario and explains the communal problem that they are trying to address (100%)
Describes the organization based on the information provided in the chosen scenario and explains the communal problem that they are trying to address but description or explanation is cursory or contains inaccuracies (70%)
Does not describe the organization based on the information provided in the chosen scenario and does not explain the communal problem that they are trying to address (0%)
3
Introduction: Budgetary
Constraints and Other Obstacles
Describes budgetary constraints and other potential obstacles that might impact the organization in addressing the problem from the agency and community standpoint (100%)
Describes budgetary constraints and other potential obstacles that might impact the organization in addressing the problem from the agency and community standpoint but description is cursory (70%)
Does not describe budgetary constraints and other potential obstacles that might impact the organization in addressing the problem from the agency and community standpoint (0%)
4.42
Introduction: Current Research
Meets “Proficient” criteria and response demonstrates an astute ability in locating appropriate research that would assist leadership and provide them with best practices of the field (100%)
Analyzes and describes the current research in the field that would help leadership ethically address the issue and base their decisions on best practices of the field (90%)
Analyzes and describes the current research in the field that would help leadership ethically address the issue and base their decisions on best practices of the field but analysis of current research does not include research that would assist leadership or provide them with best practices or description of research is cursory (70%)
Does not analyze and describe the current research in the field that would help leadership ethically address the issue and base their decisions on best practices of the field (0%)
3
Leadership Analysis: Facilitate and
Motivate
Meets “Proficient” criteria and provided examples demonstrate keen insight in recognizing instances in the chosen scenario where leadership did or did not facilitate and motive employees (100%)
Analyzes the actions of leadership in the chosen scenario for how they did or did not facilitate and motivate employees in addressing the problem, providing examples to support response (90%)
Analyzes the actions of leadership in the chosen scenario for how they did or did not facilitate and motivate employees in addressing the problem, providing examples to support response, but analysis is cursory or illogical, or provided examples are inappropriate or illogical (70%)
Does not analyze the actions of leadership in the chosen scenario for how they did or did not facilitate and motivate employees in addressing the problem (0%)
4.42
Leadership Analysis: Communication
Issues
Meets “Proficient” criteria and response demonstrates a sophisticated awareness of communication issues that leadership in criminal justice organization may face and their implications for addressing problems (100%)
Analyzes the actions of leadership in the chosen scenario for communication issues that might arise and how these issues might impede addressing the problem, providing examples to support response (90%)
Analyzes the actions of leadership in the chosen scenario for communication issues that might arise and how these issues might impede addressing the problem, providing examples to support response but analysis is cursory or illogical, or provided examples are inappropriate or illogical (70%)
Does not analyze the actions of leadership in the chosen scenario for communication issues that might arise and how these issues might impede addressing the problem (0%)
4.42
Leadership Analysis: Effective Leaders
Meets “Proficient” criteria and response demonstrates keen insight into the difference between supervising and being an effective leader (100%)
Determines whether the supervisors in the chosen scenario have functioned as effective leaders, justifying response and supporting response with appropriate research from the field (90%)
Determines whether the supervisors in the chosen scenario have functioned as effective leaders, justifying response and supporting response with appropriate research from the field but determination is cursory, illogical, or there are gaps in the justification, or supporting research is inappropriate (70%)
Does not determine whether the supervisors in the chosen scenario have functioned as effective leaders (0%)
4.42
Analysis of Ethics: Ethicality
Meets “Proficient” criteria and justification demonstrates keen insight into the ethicality of leadership’s decision making regarding their attempts to address the problem (100%)
Determines the ethicality of leadership’s decision making during their attempts to address the problem, justifying response and supporting response with appropriate research from the field (90%)
Determines the ethicality of leadership’s decision making during their attempts to address the problem, justifying response and supporting response with appropriate research from the field but determination is cursory, illogical, or there are gaps in the justification, or supporting research is inappropriate (70%)
Does not determine the ethicality of leadership’s decision making during their attempts to address the problem (0%)
5.9
Analysis of Ethics: Transparency
Meets “Proficient” criteria and response demonstrates keen insight into how the organization maintained open communication with the community in addressing the problem (100%)
Evaluates the transparency of the organization in regard to public communications, justifying response (90%)
Evaluates the transparency of the organization in regard to public communications but evaluation is cursory, illogical, or there are gaps in the justification (70%)
Does not evaluate the transparency of the organization in regard to public communications (0%)
5.9
Analysis of Ethics: Ethical Concerns
Meets “Proficient” criteria and response demonstrates keen insight into how the organization demonstrated they considered or acted on ethical concerns of the community in addressing the problem (100%)
Evaluates how leadership of the organization considered the ethical concerns of the community in addressing the problem, justifying response (90%)
Evaluates how leadership of the organization considered the ethical concerns of the community in addressing the problem, justifying response but evaluation is cursory, illogical, or there are gaps in the justification (70%)
Does not evaluate how leadership of the organization considered the ethical concerns of the community in addressing the problem (0%)
5.9
Analysis of Ethics: Performance
Meets “Proficient” criteria and response demonstrates keen insight into the potential impact of ethical decisions on employee performance (100%)
Determines how the ethical decisions of leadership may impact the performance of employees in addressing the problem (90%)
Determines how the ethical decisions of leadership may impact the performance of employees in addressing the problem, but determination is cursory or illogical (70%)
Does not determine how the ethical decisions of leadership may impact the performance of employees in addressing the problem (0%)
5.9
Analysis of Ethics: Culture
Meets “Proficient” criteria and response demonstrates keen insight into the potential impact of ethical decisions on the culture of the organization (100%)
Determines how the ethical decisions of leadership may impact the culture of the organization (90%)
Determines how the ethical decisions of leadership may impact the culture of the organization, but determination is cursory or illogical (70%)
Does not determine how the ethical decisions of leadership may impact the culture of the organization (0%)
5.9
Analysis of Ethics: Implications
Meets “Proficient” criteria and response demonstrates a sophisticated awareness of the wide-reaching implications of ethical decision-making of criminal justice organizations in addressing communal problems (100%)
Explains the overall implications of the ethical decision-making of leadership and how that affects the organization and the community, justifying response and supporting response with appropriate research from the field (90%)
Explains the overall implications of the ethical decision-making of leadership and how that affects the organization and the community, justifying response, but explanation is cursory, illogical, or there are gaps in the justification, or supporting research is inappropriate (70%)
Does not explain the overall implications of the ethical decision-making of leadership and how that affects the organization and the community (0%)
5.9
Recommendations: Leadership Style
Meets “Proficient” criteria and response demonstrates keen insight into which leadership style would be the best fit for the organization while also effectively addressing the situation (100%)
Recommends an appropriate and effective leadership style that superiors at the organization could employ to address the problem and best fit the organization based on your previous analysis, justifying response and supporting response with appropriate research from the field (90%)
Recommends an appropriate and effective leadership style that superiors at the organization could employ to address the problem and best fit the organization based on your previous analysis, justifying response but recommendation is cursory, illogical, or there are gaps in the justification, or supporting research is inappropriate (70%)
Does not recommend an appropriate and effective leadership style that superiors at the organization could employ to address the problem and best fit the organization based on your previous analysis (0%)
4.42
Recommendations: Balance
Meets “Proficient” criteria and response demonstrates keen insight into managing the intricate relationships between the communities, addressing the problem, and making ethically appropriate decisions (100%)
Makes recommendations to leadership for resolving the situation that balance the needs of the community, effectively addressing the problem and what is ethically appropriate (90%)
Makes recommendations to leadership for resolving the situation that balance the needs of the community, effectively addressing the problem, and what is ethically appropriate, but recommendations are cursory or illogical (70%)
Does not make recommendations to leadership for resolving the situation that balance the needs of the community, effectively addressing the problem and what is ethically appropriate (0%)
5.9
Recommendations: Foster Growth and
Trust
Meets “Proficient” criteria and recommendations made demonstrate a sophisticated awareness of how to foster growth and trust between communities and criminal justice organizations in response to ethical decision- making of leadership (100%)
Recommends strategies or actions that leadership could take to improve community relations and foster growth and trust between the community and the organization in response to the problem from the chosen scenario, justifying response and supporting response with appropriate research from the field (90%)
Recommends strategies or actions that leadership could take to improve community relations and foster growth and trust between the community and the organization in response to the problem from the chosen scenario, justifying response, but recommendations are cursory, illogical, or there are gaps in the justification, or supporting research is inappropriate (70%)
Does not recommend strategies or actions that leadership could take to improve community relations and foster growth and trust between the community and the organization in response to the problem from the chosen scenario (0%)
5.9
Recommendations: Culture
Meets “Proficient” criteria and recommendations made demonstrate a sophisticated awareness of how to foster growth and trust within criminal justice organizations in response to ethical decision making of leadership (100%)
Recommends strategies or actions that leadership could take to maintain and improve the culture of the organization in response to the ethical decisions of leadership regarding the problem from the chosen scenario, justifying response and supporting response with appropriate research from the field (90%)
Recommends strategies or actions that leadership could take to maintain and improve the culture of the organization in response to the ethical decisions of leadership regarding the problem from the chosen scenario, justifying response but recommendations are cursory, illogical, or there are gaps in the justification, or supporting research is inappropriate (70%)
Does not recommend strategies or actions that leadership could take to maintain and improve the culture of the organization in response to the ethical decisions of leadership regarding the problem from the chosen scenario (0%)
5.9
Recommendations: Obstacles
Meets “Proficient” criteria and response demonstrates keen insight into how the organization could account for potential obstacles (100%)
Makes recommendations for the organization for how they could account for obstacles that might impede the organization in addressing the problem and implementing recommendations (90%)
Makes recommendations for the organization for how they could account for obstacles that might impede the organization in addressing the problem and implementing recommendations but recommendations are cursory or illogical (70%)
Does not make recommendations for the organization for how they could account for obstacles that might impede the organization in addressing the problem and implementing recommendations (0%)
4.42
Recommendations: Implement and
Uphold
Meets “Proficient” criteria and response demonstrates keen insight into the specific elements that the organization could enact to implement and uphold recommendations (100%)
Explains how the organization could implement and uphold recommendations (90%)
Explains how the organization could implement and uphold recommendations but explanation is cursory or illogical (70%)
Does not explain how the organization could implement and uphold recommendations (0%)
4.42
Recommendations: Budgetary
Constraints
Meets “Proficient” criteria and response demonstrates keen insight into how the organization could account for budgetary constraints (100%)
Explains how the organization would consider any budgetary constraints they might face both in addressing the problem and implementing any of recommendations (90%)
Explains how the organization would consider any budgetary constraints they might face both in addressing the problem and implementing any of recommendations but explanation is cursory or illogical (70%)
Does not explain how the organization would consider any budgetary constraints they might face both in addressing the problem and implementing any of recommendations (0%)
4.42
Articulation of Response
Submission is free of errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, and organization and is presented in a professional and easy-to-read format (100%)
Submission has no major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization (90%)
Submission has major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that negatively impact readability and articulation of main ideas (70%)
Submission has critical errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that prevent understanding of ideas (0%)
5.54
Total 100%
- CJ 510 Final Project Guidelines and Rubric
- Overview
- Prompt
- Milestones
- Deliverables
- Final Project Rubric
>Computer Science homework help
UncategorizedPrintable document for Grist – SciFi Movies:
Grist – SciFi Movies.docx
Actions
1) Create a new database by Importing the file below:
Please download the excel import data SciFi Movie – Import.xlsx
Import Document into Grist.
Be sure the following column options are as stated below:
2) Rename the Table – Movies
3) Create another table called Directors by adding an empty table.
Add the following columns:
Director Number – Column Type – Reference: Movies Table and Director Number
Director Name – Column Type – Text
# of Movies Directed – Column Type – Numeric / Alignment – Centered
Fill in the fields and data from the table below:
Director Number
Director Name
# of Movies Directed
CRN
Christopher Nolan
10
GEL
George Lucas
18
AYW
Andy Wachowski
11
JSC
James Cameron
22
RTZ
Robert Zemeckis
25
TYG
Terry Gilliam
19
JJA
J.J. Abrams
12
SNS
Steven Spielberg
52
AOC
Alfonso Cuaron
15
AWN
Andrew Niccol
7
IOH
Ishiro Honda
59
PLV
Paul Verhoeven
28
4) Create a new page for an overview. Add a widget to new page and select a table for the Movies table with summary data for the Director Number. Remove the Count and Rating Columns.
5) Rename the new page in the navigational bar Movie Overview.
6) Add Widget to page and select the card widget for the Movies table with summary data for the Movie Number. Change the Theme to Blocks. Customize the card by hiding the count field and moving Length-Minutes to the second row. You will have 3 fields going across on the 2nd row.
7) Add widget to page and select the chart widget for the Movies table with a summary of data for the Awards. Change the chart to a pie chart. Hide all series except for Awards and count. Customize layout appropriately.
*When complete, your Movie Overview page should have a Movie summary of the Movies table, a Movies Card widget and a Movies Chart Widget.
8) In the Movies table create a new field name called Movie Rating.
Column Type – Choice: R, PG and PG-13
Update the rest of the table to meet the data below.
Movie Names
Movie Rating
Aliens
R
Back to the Future
PG
E.T.
PG
Gravity
PG-13
Godzilla
PG-13
Inception
PG-13
Gattaca
PG-13
Starship Troopers
R
Star Trek
PG-13
Star Wars
PG
Terminator
R
Twelve Monkeys
R
The Matrix
R
9) Add widget to Movies page and select the chart widget for the Movies table with a summary of data for the Movie Rating. Change the chart to a pie chart. Hide all series except for Movie Rating and count. Customize layout appropriately.
Health Care Administration
Nursing HomeworksUnit 9 Assignment
Unit outcomes addressed in this Assignment:
· Develop logic model to develop programs in the administration of health care.
Course outcome assessed/addressed in this Assignment:
HS499-5: Health Care Administration: Demonstrate an understanding of the forces impacting health delivery systems and the effective management of health care administration.
Instructions
There are many forces that impact health delivery systems. Choose one aspect that influences how health delivery systems are challenged, and describe the issue. Examples include, but are not limited to, access to care, quality health care improvement, lack of coordinated care, continuity of care (medical home), etc.
After reviewing the Logic Model Development Guide from the readings, create a logic model for a new program you would like to fund to address this impact on the health delivery system. Discuss how the program can be applied to reduce the impact on the health delivery system.
Requirements
· The paper should be at least 975 words in length
· Your paper must include a logic model that you create (explaining the content of a logic model is insufficient)
· Include a list of references in APA format, including the information used from the modules.
WHAT ARE THE TRADE-OFFS OFFERED TO BRING BALANCE TO THE HEALTHCARE STAKEHOLDERS?
UncategorizedMaintaining the Loyalty of Stakeholders
To maintain political, governmental, staff, and patient loyalty, the healthcare organization must provide a sense of organizational stability and view of the legislative landscape. In Chapters 14 and 15 we have researched and investigated the need to align both public opinion with staff trust. The political landscape is the basis for healthcare policy, guidance, state, local, and community support (both fiscal and legal) engaging in political trade-offs to stabilize the healthcare industry (such as in the cost, pharmaceuticals, insurance premiums, and organizational ROI in the healthcare industry). Healthcare organizations must provide the necessary guidance and advocacy for stakeholders in the setting of both state and federal legislature as a voice of reason, authority, and integrity. Provide information on the following:
Your paper
THE ROLE OF PERSONAL HEALTH RECORDS
Nursing HomeworksTHE ROLE OF PERSONAL HEALTH RECORDS
The My Health Record system was first introduced by the Australian Government in 2012 and allows people seeking health care in Australia to register for a My Health Record. My Health Record is an online summary of the key health information of all Australian Citizens. It contains key health information drawn from the existing electronic records of multiple healthcare providers involved in a patient’s care, including their general practitioner. The patient can control what information goes into it and which organisations have access to their record. Over the past few weeks there has been much contentious debate about this e-Health Solution relating to privacy, security and a vigorous discussion whether or not the system should be ‘opt in’ or ‘opt out’. When one “opts in” to a program, they expressly give their consent to being part of the program. When one “opts out” of a program, they are expressly indicating that they DO NOT wish to be part of the program. Visithttp://www.abc.net.au/news/science/2018-07-18/my-health-record-opt-out-confusion/10000008 for some background on this issue.
Once you have done that, have a look at this article and video…
Stay or go? My Health Record
You will need to undertake some additional research on the issue of ‘opt in’ or ‘opt out’ approaches to e-Health and argue the point for or against (an opt in or opt out system).
The word counts: 150 words
Number of references: 1 – Use the style APA 6th Edition referencing
Locate a primary research report from the University Library that is nursing focused. The study should be current research (within 5-7 years). For this source include the following information:
UncategorizedLocate a Primary Research Study
Locate a primary research report from the University Library that is nursing focused. The study should be current research (within 5-7 years). For this source include the following information:
Assessment and Care of Patients With Conditions of the Head, Neck, Esophagus, and Diaphragm
Nursing HomeworksAssessment and Care of Patients With Conditions of the Head, Neck, Esophagus, and Diaphragm
ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER NOW
This week, as you explore the pre- and post-operative care of patients with conditions related to the head, neck, esophagus, and diaphragm, you examine strategies for assessment, diagnosis, and treatment.
Learning Objectives
By the end of this week, students will:
Learning Resources
Required Readings
Required Media
Assignment 1: Assessing, Diagnosing, and Treating Pre- and Post-Operative Care Patients – Head, Neck, Esophagus, and Diaphragm
There are many common health conditions associated with the head, neck, esophagus, and diaphragm. Although these conditions and their related symptoms usually are managed easily, a delay in treatment can result in sensory debility such as hearing loss or sight loss. For this Assignment, as you examine this week’s i-Human patient case study, consider how you might evaluate and treat pre- and post-operative patients who present with health conditions related to the head, neck, esophagus, and diaphragm.
To prepare:
To complete:
As you interact with this week’s i-Human patient, complete the assigned case study. For guidance on using i-Human, refer to the i-Human Patients Case Player Student Manual in the Week 2 Learning Resources.
By Day 7
This Assignment is due.
Grading Information
Assignment 2: Fitzgerald Health Education Associates (FHEA) AGPCNP 150 University Exit Comprehensive Exam
The Fitzgerald Health Education Associates (FHEA) AGACNP 150 University Exit Comprehensive Exam is a learning activity used to guide your preparation for your national certification exams. The results of the exam will help you understand how well prepared you are for your national certification exams and the areas in which you need to further prepare.
In Weeks 1 or 2 of this course, you should have received an email from Fitzgerald Health Education Associates (FHEA) explaining how to access the Fitzgerald Health Education Associates (FHEA) AGACNP 150 University Exit Comprehensive Exam. Please follow the directions FHEA provided and complete the exam. Assessment and Care of Patients With Conditions of the Head, Neck, Esophagus, and Diaphragm
This exam is graded on a S/U basis. You must complete the exam by Day 7 of Week 3 to receive the grade of ‘S’.
By Day 7
Complete the Fitzgerald Health Education Associates (FHEA) AGACNP 150 University Exit Comprehensive Exam.
Week in Review
This week you evaluated medical and surgical patients with head, neck, esophagus and diaphragm conditions/injuries with the realization that delays in treatment could result in hearing or sight loss, and developed differential diagnoses and treatment plans for these conditions.
Next week you will study the pre- and post-operative care of patients with cardiovascular conditions and examine strategies for assessment, diagnosis, and treatment.
Assessment and Care of Patients With Conditions of the Head, Neck, Esophagus, and Diaphragm
English homework help
UncategorizedResearch Paper Instructions
This assignment consists of three parts to this one assignment. You will submit an annotated bibliography, a properly formatted title and reference page (using current APA guidelines), and you will submit a Research Paper. Please review the detailed instructions below.
Research Paper: Annotated Bibliography
The Annotated Bibliography is designed to assist you with your Research Paper references, to teach you how to search for scholarly journal articles, and to give you practice using proper in-text citations.
For this assignment, you will be annotating 4 scholarly (peer-reviewed) journal articles. You will select 2 articles that support Behavioral Learning Theory, and 2 that support Cognitive Learning Theory. Choose articles that have been published within the last 5 years.
Your Annotated Bibliography must have at least 150 words per summary for each of the 4 articles you selected. Each annotation must provide a general summary of the article and also state a rationale as to why it might be included in a summative research paper. Do NOT use first person. You must paraphrase; do not include any direct quotes. Do not cite other sources outside of the article that you are reviewing.
You will list your first reference, then a review of the article, then the next reference, then a review of that article, etc. This assignment does not need to include a title page, or reference page. However, each reference must be listed in current APA format before the 150-word review. Review the APA guide for annotated bibliography formatting and examples.
If you need assistance understanding an annotated bibliography please check in the Liberty Online Library under annotated bibliography.If you need assistance finding scholarly journal articles, please check out the Liberty’s Online Library.
Research Paper: Reference Page
For this assignment, you will submit a reference page in current APA format for your Research Paper. In addition to the textbook and the Bible, your reference page must contain at least 6 scholarly peer reviewed journal articles. For the 4 peer-reviewed journal articles, 2 of these must support/use Behavioral Learning Theory and 2 must support/use Cognitive Learning Theory. Remaining sources must address educational implications, historical context, and/or biblical worldview topics related to Behavioral and Cognitive Learning Theories. Each of the 6 peer-reviewed journal articles must have been published within the last 5 years. Popular writing, books, and web pages are NOT acceptable sources for this paper.
Final Research Paper
For this assignment, you will use what you have already learned through the Annotated Bibliography and Reference Page assignments to write a Research Paper that will compare Behavioral Learning Theories and Cognitive Learning Theories. You will include a title page, an 8-page body, and a reference page. The body will include an introduction, 6 sections, and a conclusion. The paper must be written in current APA format. Current APA Level 1 sub-headings must be used throughout the paper. The 6 main sections of the paper will address the following topics:
1. Historical Development of Each Theory—For each theory, discuss prominent persons and their corresponding historic research. Include how the theory developed over time. Have there been significant changes from its development to current research?
2. Key Concepts of Each Theory—This section will focus on the major points of each theory. How is new information acquired? What are the goals of learning? What is unique about each theory?
3. Research Support for Each Theory—This section will include a review of 4 peer-reviewed scholarly research articles. The first 2 articles will address research in which Behavior Learning Theory has been applied. The other 2 articles will use Cognitive Learning Theory in the research. Each article must show the effectiveness of the learning theory it addresses.
4. Educational Implications—This section will discuss the implications for how learning takes place in the classroom. Discuss the benefits and applications of each theory. How would each theory explain about learn in a classroom setting? What are the benefits to teaching new information utilizing each theory?
5. Biblical Worldview—Discuss what the Bible says regarding learning behavior in humans. How would a biblical worldview impact a learner? Include chapter and verse when citing the Bible.
6. Most Effective Theory of Learning—Select which theory of learning (Behavioral or Cognitive) is most effective. Substantiate this decision with research support citing journal articles and the textbook.
Reference Requirements
Required sources for this paper include the Bible, your textbook, and 6 peer-reviewed journal articles. Sources must address Behavioral and Cognitive Learning Theories, educational implications, historical context, and/or biblical worldview topics related to Behavioral and Cognitive Learning Theories. All sources must have been published within the last 5 years. Do not use first person, only third person is allowed in APA writing. Popular writing and web pages are NOT acceptable sources for this paper. Refer to the grading rubric to fully understand the requirements for this assignment.
· Explain what the author initial objectives (hypothesis) and results including the process he or she used to arrive at such conclusion.
UncategorizedNursing research
Library Assignment
Critique a Research Article
A critique is a method of displaying a logical and organized analysis of a written or oral piece. Critique can provide the readers with both positive and negative outcomes depending on the author. The purpose of this assignment is for the student to perform a critique on a research article that deals with today’s health issues. In this paper the student must be diligent at what the author are claiming, taking into account the research methods being utilized and look for pros and cons of the researcher’s outcomes.
The assignment must be a minimal of five pages, excluding title page and references. The assignment must be strictly following APA guidelines, points will be deducted if otherwise. Do not use first person throughout the paper until the section called evaluate the paper. It will be divided in the following manner:
Title page: Give the name of the article, the authors name(s) and your name. Following APPA
Introduction:
· Provide an overview of the author’s research problem, research questions and main point including how the author supports his or her point.
· Explain what the author initial objectives (hypothesis) and results including the process he or she used to arrive at such conclusion.
Evaluate the Research Methods: in paragraph form answer the following:
· Does the author provide a literature review?
· Is the research current and relevant to today existing health issues?
· Describe the research type utilized?– experimental, non-experimental, quasi experimental, etc.
· Evaluate the sample (size, composition, or in the way the sample was selected in relation to the purpose of the study? Was the sample appropriate for the research or was it bias?
· How practicaldoes this work seem to you? How does the author suggest research results could be applied and how do youbelieve they could be applied?
· Could the study have been improved in your opinion? If so provide how you think it could have improved.
· Is the writing in the article clear straightforward?
· Can further research be conducted on this subject? Explain
Conclusion: In your conclusion, try to synthesize the pieces of your critique to emphasize your own main points about the author’s work, relating the researcher’s work to your own knowledge or to topics being discussed in your course.
Reference Page: APA style, see rubric below
Criminal homework help
UncategorizedOverview Criminal justice professionals are asked to serve the public with professionalism and fairness. Regardless of crimes committed by a suspect, the suspect must be treated respectfully and ethically. Leaders are expected to be able to take command of tragedies and major incidents. Administrators must walk a fine line to keep the public informed and their subordinates safe. It takes a true leader to be able to gain the trust of the community and the criminal justice professionals that serve under that particular leader. In order to achieve the qualities of a true leader, one must be able to approach problem situations effectively and address problems ethically and appropriately for all parties involved.
The final project in this course will expose you to a problem situation and task you with how it should be solved. You will imagine you are employed at a criminal justice organization facing a communal problem. Your superior at the organization has asked you to review the problem situation and offer your recommendations. You will be given the chance to evaluate the situation and develop suggestions that will inform development of strategies to address the issue using appropriate ethical and transparent leadership and communication skills. It is important to be able to recognize what leadership style you may be using and if that style will be effective in dealing with an issue at hand. This project will give you the experience and tools necessary to address problem situations and effectively lead both your subordinates and the parties involved while also coordinating with your superiors.
The final project for this course is the creation of a problem analysis with recommendations report. The final product represents an authentic demonstration of competency because it requires you to apply leadership concepts and ethical decision-making regarding decisions that will affect numerous stakeholders. The stakeholders include your law enforcement organization, a community, and many others such as political leaders and government officials. The project is supported by four milestones, which will be submitted at various points throughout the course to scaffold learning and ensure quality final submissions. These milestones will be submitted in Modules One, Three, Five, and Seven. The final product will be submitted in Module Nine.
In this assignment, you will demonstrate your mastery of the following course outcomes:
Analyze leadership dynamics and approaches used within criminal justice organizations for determining appropriate leadership styles that address communal problems
Determine the potential impact of the ethical decision-making of leadership on the operations of employees and the organizational culture within criminal justice agencies
Evaluate the ethical decision-making of leadership in criminal justice organizations based on accepted best practices and appropriate research Recommend strategies for fostering growth and trust between and within communities and criminal justice organizations Make recommendations for overcoming obstacles for implementing new strategies to internal and external key stakeholders in criminal justice
organizations
Prompt For the final project, imagine you are a professional working in a criminal justice organization. Your superior has asked your opinion on a problem facing the community. You will be given a basic scenario detailing a department of the organization that is trying to address a communal problem. You will complete a report explaining the problem facing the community and offering any recommendations and strategies you believe could effectively address the problem.
You will select one of the following case studies to analyze for your final project. To access the case studies, refer to the Harvard Business Review Coursepack Module:
1. NYPD New 2. The Flawed Emergency Response to the 1992 Los Angeles Riots
Specifically, the following critical elements must be addressed:
I. Introduction A. Describe the organization based on the information provided in the chosen scenario and explain the communal problem that they are trying to
address. B. Describe budgetary constraints and other potential obstacles that might impact the organization in addressing the problem from the agency and
community standpoint. C. Analyze and describe the current research in the field that would help leadership ethically address the issue and base their decisions on best
practices of the field.
II. Leadership Analysis A. Analyze the actions of leadership in the chosen scenario for how they did or did not facilitate and motivate employees in addressing the
problem. Be sure to provide examples from the scenario to support your response. What instances in the chosen scenario exemplify the approach of leadership in encouraging and interacting with employees?
B. Analyze the actions of leadership in the chosen scenario for communication issues that might arise and how these issues might impede addressing the problem. Be sure to provide examples from the scenario to support your response. What communication issues might leadership face when addressing this problem? What are the implications or consequences of these issues?
C. Determine whether the supervisors in the chosen scenario have functioned as effective leaders. Be sure to justify your response and support your response with appropriate research from the field gathered in your previous review.
III. Analysis of Ethics A. Determine the ethicality of leadership’s decision making during their attempts to address the problem. Be sure to justify your response and
support your response with appropriate research from the field gathered in your previous review.
B. Evaluate the transparency of the organization in regard to public communications. Be sure to justify your response. For example, are systems in place to communicate with the public? Has the organization been readily available and willing to provide the community with information regarding the problem?
C. Evaluate how leadership of the organization considered the ethical concerns of the community in addressing the problem. Be sure to justify your response. For example, how were the concerns of internal and external stakeholders considered?
D. Determine how the ethical decisions of leadership may impact the performance of employees in addressing the problem. How might these decisions improve employees’ ability to address the problem? How might they hinder their ability to address the problem?
E. Determine how the ethical decisions of leadership may impact the culture of the organization. For example, what if employees do not agree with the decisions?
F. Explain the overall implications of the ethical decision-making of leadership and how that affects the organization and the community. Be sure to justify your response, and support your response with appropriate research from the field gathered in your previous review.
IV. Recommendations A. Recommend an appropriate and effective leadership style that superiors at the organization could employ to address the problem and best fit
the organization based on your previous analysis. Be sure to justify your response. B. Make recommendations to leadership for resolving the situation that balance the needs of the community, effectively addressing the problem,
and what is ethically appropriate. How should leadership balance these three important elements in addressing the problem? C. Recommend strategies or actions that leadership could take to improve community relations and foster growth and trust between the
community and the organization in response to the problem from the chosen scenario. Be sure to justify your response and support your response with appropriate research from the field gathered in your previous review.
D. Recommend strategies or actions that leadership could take to maintain and improve the culture of the organization in response to the ethical decisions of leadership regarding the problem from the chosen scenario. Be sure to justify your response and support your response with appropriate research from the field gathered in your previous review.
E. Make recommendations for the organization on how they could account for obstacles that might impede the organization in addressing the problem and implementing your recommendations.
F. Explain how the organization could implement and uphold your recommendations. For example, should they enact new policies? Training? G. Explain how the organization would consider any budgetary constraints they might face both in addressing the problem and implementing any
of your recommendations.
Milestones Milestone One: Case Study Selection In Module One, you will submit the case study that you have selected to complete your final project on. Review the final project and then the two case study options. You will post your case study selection in a journal assignment. This milestone will be graded with the Milestone One Rubric.
Milestone Two: Leadership Analysis In Module Three, you will submit your leadership analysis. You will analyze how leadership acted in your selected case study in regard to how they facilitated or motivated employees, what communication issues might affect how they addressed the problem, and whether or not the supervisors in your selected case study functioned as effective leaders. This milestone will be graded with the Milestone Two Rubric.
Milestone Three: Analysis of Ethics In Module Five, you will submit an analysis of ethics. You will analyze your selected case study for the ethics that were used to address the problem. You will evaluate how leadership addressed the problem and whether they used ethical decision-making. This milestone will be graded with the Milestone Three Rubric.
Milestone Four: Recommendations In Module Seven, you will submit recommendations. You will use your previous analysis of the leadership and ethics and recommend strategies to help improve the organization’s use of ethical decision-making, the overall culture of the organization, and their relationship with the community. You will then identify obstacles that might occur when the plan is being implemented and strategies to help the organization implement and uphold your recommendations. This milestone will be graded with the Milestone Four Rubric.
Final Submission: Problem Analysis With Recommendations Report In Module Nine, you will submit your final project. It should be a complete, polished artifact containing all of the critical elements of the final product. It should reflect the incorporation of feedback gained throughout the course. This submission will be graded with the Final Project Rubric.
Deliverables
Milestone Deliverable Module Due Grading
One Case Study Selection One Graded separately; Milestone One Rubric
Two Leadership Analysis Three Graded separately; Milestone Two Rubric
Three Analysis of Ethics Five Graded separately; Milestone Three Rubric
Four Recommendations Seven Graded separately; Milestone Four Rubric
Final Submission: Problem Analysis With Recommendations Report
Nine Graded separately; Final Project Rubric
Final Project Rubric Guidelines for Submission: Your problem analysis should be 6–8 pages in 12-point Times New Roman font, double-spaced, following appropriate APA formatting.
Critical Elements Exemplary Proficient Needs Improvement Not Evident Value
Introduction: Problem
Describes the organization based on the information provided in the chosen scenario and explains the communal problem that they are trying to address (100%)
Describes the organization based on the information provided in the chosen scenario and explains the communal problem that they are trying to address but description or explanation is cursory or contains inaccuracies (70%)
Does not describe the organization based on the information provided in the chosen scenario and does not explain the communal problem that they are trying to address (0%)
3
Introduction: Budgetary
Constraints and Other Obstacles
Describes budgetary constraints and other potential obstacles that might impact the organization in addressing the problem from the agency and community standpoint (100%)
Describes budgetary constraints and other potential obstacles that might impact the organization in addressing the problem from the agency and community standpoint but description is cursory (70%)
Does not describe budgetary constraints and other potential obstacles that might impact the organization in addressing the problem from the agency and community standpoint (0%)
4.42
Introduction: Current Research
Meets “Proficient” criteria and response demonstrates an astute ability in locating appropriate research that would assist leadership and provide them with best practices of the field (100%)
Analyzes and describes the current research in the field that would help leadership ethically address the issue and base their decisions on best practices of the field (90%)
Analyzes and describes the current research in the field that would help leadership ethically address the issue and base their decisions on best practices of the field but analysis of current research does not include research that would assist leadership or provide them with best practices or description of research is cursory (70%)
Does not analyze and describe the current research in the field that would help leadership ethically address the issue and base their decisions on best practices of the field (0%)
3
Leadership Analysis: Facilitate and
Motivate
Meets “Proficient” criteria and provided examples demonstrate keen insight in recognizing instances in the chosen scenario where leadership did or did not facilitate and motive employees (100%)
Analyzes the actions of leadership in the chosen scenario for how they did or did not facilitate and motivate employees in addressing the problem, providing examples to support response (90%)
Analyzes the actions of leadership in the chosen scenario for how they did or did not facilitate and motivate employees in addressing the problem, providing examples to support response, but analysis is cursory or illogical, or provided examples are inappropriate or illogical (70%)
Does not analyze the actions of leadership in the chosen scenario for how they did or did not facilitate and motivate employees in addressing the problem (0%)
4.42
Leadership Analysis: Communication
Issues
Meets “Proficient” criteria and response demonstrates a sophisticated awareness of communication issues that leadership in criminal justice organization may face and their implications for addressing problems (100%)
Analyzes the actions of leadership in the chosen scenario for communication issues that might arise and how these issues might impede addressing the problem, providing examples to support response (90%)
Analyzes the actions of leadership in the chosen scenario for communication issues that might arise and how these issues might impede addressing the problem, providing examples to support response but analysis is cursory or illogical, or provided examples are inappropriate or illogical (70%)
Does not analyze the actions of leadership in the chosen scenario for communication issues that might arise and how these issues might impede addressing the problem (0%)
4.42
Leadership Analysis: Effective Leaders
Meets “Proficient” criteria and response demonstrates keen insight into the difference between supervising and being an effective leader (100%)
Determines whether the supervisors in the chosen scenario have functioned as effective leaders, justifying response and supporting response with appropriate research from the field (90%)
Determines whether the supervisors in the chosen scenario have functioned as effective leaders, justifying response and supporting response with appropriate research from the field but determination is cursory, illogical, or there are gaps in the justification, or supporting research is inappropriate (70%)
Does not determine whether the supervisors in the chosen scenario have functioned as effective leaders (0%)
4.42
Analysis of Ethics: Ethicality
Meets “Proficient” criteria and justification demonstrates keen insight into the ethicality of leadership’s decision making regarding their attempts to address the problem (100%)
Determines the ethicality of leadership’s decision making during their attempts to address the problem, justifying response and supporting response with appropriate research from the field (90%)
Determines the ethicality of leadership’s decision making during their attempts to address the problem, justifying response and supporting response with appropriate research from the field but determination is cursory, illogical, or there are gaps in the justification, or supporting research is inappropriate (70%)
Does not determine the ethicality of leadership’s decision making during their attempts to address the problem (0%)
5.9
Analysis of Ethics: Transparency
Meets “Proficient” criteria and response demonstrates keen insight into how the organization maintained open communication with the community in addressing the problem (100%)
Evaluates the transparency of the organization in regard to public communications, justifying response (90%)
Evaluates the transparency of the organization in regard to public communications but evaluation is cursory, illogical, or there are gaps in the justification (70%)
Does not evaluate the transparency of the organization in regard to public communications (0%)
5.9
Analysis of Ethics: Ethical Concerns
Meets “Proficient” criteria and response demonstrates keen insight into how the organization demonstrated they considered or acted on ethical concerns of the community in addressing the problem (100%)
Evaluates how leadership of the organization considered the ethical concerns of the community in addressing the problem, justifying response (90%)
Evaluates how leadership of the organization considered the ethical concerns of the community in addressing the problem, justifying response but evaluation is cursory, illogical, or there are gaps in the justification (70%)
Does not evaluate how leadership of the organization considered the ethical concerns of the community in addressing the problem (0%)
5.9
Analysis of Ethics: Performance
Meets “Proficient” criteria and response demonstrates keen insight into the potential impact of ethical decisions on employee performance (100%)
Determines how the ethical decisions of leadership may impact the performance of employees in addressing the problem (90%)
Determines how the ethical decisions of leadership may impact the performance of employees in addressing the problem, but determination is cursory or illogical (70%)
Does not determine how the ethical decisions of leadership may impact the performance of employees in addressing the problem (0%)
5.9
Analysis of Ethics: Culture
Meets “Proficient” criteria and response demonstrates keen insight into the potential impact of ethical decisions on the culture of the organization (100%)
Determines how the ethical decisions of leadership may impact the culture of the organization (90%)
Determines how the ethical decisions of leadership may impact the culture of the organization, but determination is cursory or illogical (70%)
Does not determine how the ethical decisions of leadership may impact the culture of the organization (0%)
5.9
Analysis of Ethics: Implications
Meets “Proficient” criteria and response demonstrates a sophisticated awareness of the wide-reaching implications of ethical decision-making of criminal justice organizations in addressing communal problems (100%)
Explains the overall implications of the ethical decision-making of leadership and how that affects the organization and the community, justifying response and supporting response with appropriate research from the field (90%)
Explains the overall implications of the ethical decision-making of leadership and how that affects the organization and the community, justifying response, but explanation is cursory, illogical, or there are gaps in the justification, or supporting research is inappropriate (70%)
Does not explain the overall implications of the ethical decision-making of leadership and how that affects the organization and the community (0%)
5.9
Recommendations: Leadership Style
Meets “Proficient” criteria and response demonstrates keen insight into which leadership style would be the best fit for the organization while also effectively addressing the situation (100%)
Recommends an appropriate and effective leadership style that superiors at the organization could employ to address the problem and best fit the organization based on your previous analysis, justifying response and supporting response with appropriate research from the field (90%)
Recommends an appropriate and effective leadership style that superiors at the organization could employ to address the problem and best fit the organization based on your previous analysis, justifying response but recommendation is cursory, illogical, or there are gaps in the justification, or supporting research is inappropriate (70%)
Does not recommend an appropriate and effective leadership style that superiors at the organization could employ to address the problem and best fit the organization based on your previous analysis (0%)
4.42
Recommendations: Balance
Meets “Proficient” criteria and response demonstrates keen insight into managing the intricate relationships between the communities, addressing the problem, and making ethically appropriate decisions (100%)
Makes recommendations to leadership for resolving the situation that balance the needs of the community, effectively addressing the problem and what is ethically appropriate (90%)
Makes recommendations to leadership for resolving the situation that balance the needs of the community, effectively addressing the problem, and what is ethically appropriate, but recommendations are cursory or illogical (70%)
Does not make recommendations to leadership for resolving the situation that balance the needs of the community, effectively addressing the problem and what is ethically appropriate (0%)
5.9
Recommendations: Foster Growth and
Trust
Meets “Proficient” criteria and recommendations made demonstrate a sophisticated awareness of how to foster growth and trust between communities and criminal justice organizations in response to ethical decision- making of leadership (100%)
Recommends strategies or actions that leadership could take to improve community relations and foster growth and trust between the community and the organization in response to the problem from the chosen scenario, justifying response and supporting response with appropriate research from the field (90%)
Recommends strategies or actions that leadership could take to improve community relations and foster growth and trust between the community and the organization in response to the problem from the chosen scenario, justifying response, but recommendations are cursory, illogical, or there are gaps in the justification, or supporting research is inappropriate (70%)
Does not recommend strategies or actions that leadership could take to improve community relations and foster growth and trust between the community and the organization in response to the problem from the chosen scenario (0%)
5.9
Recommendations: Culture
Meets “Proficient” criteria and recommendations made demonstrate a sophisticated awareness of how to foster growth and trust within criminal justice organizations in response to ethical decision making of leadership (100%)
Recommends strategies or actions that leadership could take to maintain and improve the culture of the organization in response to the ethical decisions of leadership regarding the problem from the chosen scenario, justifying response and supporting response with appropriate research from the field (90%)
Recommends strategies or actions that leadership could take to maintain and improve the culture of the organization in response to the ethical decisions of leadership regarding the problem from the chosen scenario, justifying response but recommendations are cursory, illogical, or there are gaps in the justification, or supporting research is inappropriate (70%)
Does not recommend strategies or actions that leadership could take to maintain and improve the culture of the organization in response to the ethical decisions of leadership regarding the problem from the chosen scenario (0%)
5.9
Recommendations: Obstacles
Meets “Proficient” criteria and response demonstrates keen insight into how the organization could account for potential obstacles (100%)
Makes recommendations for the organization for how they could account for obstacles that might impede the organization in addressing the problem and implementing recommendations (90%)
Makes recommendations for the organization for how they could account for obstacles that might impede the organization in addressing the problem and implementing recommendations but recommendations are cursory or illogical (70%)
Does not make recommendations for the organization for how they could account for obstacles that might impede the organization in addressing the problem and implementing recommendations (0%)
4.42
Recommendations: Implement and
Uphold
Meets “Proficient” criteria and response demonstrates keen insight into the specific elements that the organization could enact to implement and uphold recommendations (100%)
Explains how the organization could implement and uphold recommendations (90%)
Explains how the organization could implement and uphold recommendations but explanation is cursory or illogical (70%)
Does not explain how the organization could implement and uphold recommendations (0%)
4.42
Recommendations: Budgetary
Constraints
Meets “Proficient” criteria and response demonstrates keen insight into how the organization could account for budgetary constraints (100%)
Explains how the organization would consider any budgetary constraints they might face both in addressing the problem and implementing any of recommendations (90%)
Explains how the organization would consider any budgetary constraints they might face both in addressing the problem and implementing any of recommendations but explanation is cursory or illogical (70%)
Does not explain how the organization would consider any budgetary constraints they might face both in addressing the problem and implementing any of recommendations (0%)
4.42
Articulation of Response
Submission is free of errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, and organization and is presented in a professional and easy-to-read format (100%)
Submission has no major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization (90%)
Submission has major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that negatively impact readability and articulation of main ideas (70%)
Submission has critical errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that prevent understanding of ideas (0%)
5.54
Total 100%
THE REASONS WHY BSN NURSING EDUCTION AND ABOVE IS IMPORTANT
Nursing HomeworksTHE REASONS WHY BSN NURSING EDUCTION AND ABOVE IS IMPORTANT