I have a attached the following 2 presentations they were in link on the instruction sheet on how to complete this PowerPoint. I have an ebook they I can do a few screenshots of to help complete assignment if you need me too. So please let me know if you need more info from the Chapters for this Unit ll assignment  in the ebook to this course. 

SCI 491 Evolution
Please pick one of the following topics and write a 4-5 page response (double-spaced, 12-point font), citing at least 3 non-web sources (journal papers that you find on-line are okay, but cite the journal). Use APA format. Points will be deducted if the paper does not fit within these page limits, not including references.
1.) Discuss the debate over adaptationism.
2.) Discuss how female choice shapes sexual selection.
3.) Discuss how competition and cooperation shape evolution of the parent/offspring relationship.
Please attach copies of the pages from you references from which you get your information. Attach only the pages you used, not the whole reference document, along with the citation that goes with it. Your exam will not be graded without these.

philos201

Assignment Details Recall that epistemology is the branch of philosophy concerned with knowledge. In the study of epistemology, philosophers are concerned with the epistemological shift. This is the idea that one has shifted, or changed, the way he or she takes in knowledge.  For example, you read many of your books on screens and e-readers today. This is a change from the past. In fact, there have been university libraries that have opened without any physical books (e-books only). Thanks to the Internet and smartphones, people do not have to memorize information the way they did in decades past. Reflect upon this issue and then respond to the following questions:
· Are philosophers correct to be concerned with this shift?
· Discuss the pros and cons of the epistemological shift in an essay.
Utilize at least 2 credible sources to support your position presented in the paper. Make sure you cite them appropriately within your paper, and list them in APA format on your Reference page. Your paper should be 3-4 pages in length, not counting the Title page and Reference page. In accordance with APA formatting requirements, your paper should include a Title and Reference page, should be double-spaced, and include a running head and page numbers
Assignment 1.2: Conflicting Viewpoints Essay – Part II
Synthesizing and Writing
Due Week 5 and worth 100 points
When looking for information about a particular issue, how often do  you try to resist biases toward your own point of view? This assignment  asks you to engage in this aspect of critical thinking.
The assignment is divided into two (2) parts.
For Part I of the assignment (due Week 3), you read a critical thinking process: “The Believing Game and How to Make Conflicting Opinions More Fruitful” by Peter Elbow. , reviewed the Procon.org Website in order to gather information, and engaged in prewriting to examine your thoughts.
* Remember that in the Week 2 Discussion, you examined the biases discussed in Chapter 2 of the webtext.
In Part II of the assignment (due Week 5), you will write a paper to synthesize your ideas.
Part II – Writing
Write at three to four (3-4) page paper in which you:

  1. State your position on the topic you selected for Assignment 1.1.
  2. Identify (3) three premises (reasons) from the Procon.org website  that support your position and explain why you selected these specific  reasons.
  3. Explain your answers to the “believing” questions about the three  (3) premises opposing your position from the Procon.org website.
  4. Examine at least two (2) types of biases that you likely  experienced as you evaluated the premises for and against your position.
  5. Discuss the effects of your own enculturation or group identification that may have influenced your biases.
  6. Discuss whether or not your thinking about the topic has changed  after playing the “Believing Game,” even if your position on the issue  has stayed the same.

The paper should follow guidelines for clear and organized writing:

Fundamental of Mental Health Nursing: Therapeutic Relationship- Nursing Essay Writing Assignment

Task:

Recovery and the therapeutic relationship are foundational concepts in mental health nursing. The intent of this essay is to endow you with a thorough understanding of foundational concepts in contemporary mental health nursing. This essay will require you to explore and develop an understanding of the literature in relation to recovery, and in relation to the therapeutic relationship. You will be expected to demonstrate an understanding of how the concepts apply to mental health nursing, and you will be expected to develop logical arguments by using evidence.

Recovery and the Therapeutic Relationship in Mental Health Nursing This assessment is an essay style task, which will require you to demonstrate your understanding of foundational concepts in mental health nursing. This assessment requires you to address two separate questions.

Question 1 (worth 20%):

Discuss the meaning of recovery in mental health care. In your answer, identify principle tenets of the recovery paradigm and its general implications for practice.

Question 2 (worth 20%):

Discuss how and why nurses develop a therapeutic relationship/therapeutic alliance with consumers. Relate the discussion to recovery principles.

Execution:

You are to address each question separately. To do so, clearly, title each answer with the headings ‘Question 1’ and ‘Question 2’.

Do not write an introduction or conclusion paragraph.

Important Notes on Writing and Referencing:

A maximum of 5 websites can be referenced in this assignment.

If referencing an edited textbook, the specific chapter must be cited.

You are to use a minimum of ten references.

Determination of Moral Status
Write a 750-1000 word analysis of “Case Study: Fetal Abnormality.” Be sure to address the following questions:

  1. Which theory or theories are being used by Jessica, Marco, Maria, and Dr. Wilson to determine the moral status of the fetus? Explain.
  2. How does the theory determine or influence each of their recommendation for action?
  3. What theory do you agree with? How would that theory determine or influence the recommendation for action?

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.
RUBRIC:
Determination of Moral Status
Theory/Theories are identified that determine the moral status of the fetus for all of the people listed in the case study, including a detailed explanation.
Recommendation for Action
Recommendation for action is present, with detailed explanation that shows a deep understanding of the subject.
Personal Response to Case Study
Personal response to case study includes if you agree or disagree and a detailed explanation that shows a deep understanding of the subject including how the theory determines or influences the recommendation for action.
Thesis Development and Purpose
Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive. The essence of the paper is contained within the thesis. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
Argument Logic and Construction
Clear and convincing argument presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)
Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)
All format elements are correct
Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)
Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.

 Prepare a 10–12-slide PowerPoint presentation for department managers on building leadership and trust in collaborative teams.

Perhaps the best predictor of team success is its clarity of purpose and the team’s commitment to achieving it. To support that purpose, a team needs a process that moves smoothly from vision and mission to goals and tasks in order to achieve the desired outcomes. The foundation of both purpose and process is leadership.

Requirements

You have been asked by organizational leadership to develop a PowerPoint presentation for department managers on building leadership and trust in collaborative teams. Your presentation should be 10–12 slides in length and include a references slide at the end. Use the notes section of each slide to expand your talking points and reference your resources. Be sure your references are formatted according to APA guidelines.

This assessment examines two critical components for interprofessional team success: leadership and trust. Develop a PowerPoint presentation in which you:

  • Identify at least three leadership behaviors that build trust within a team.
  • Identify at least three leadership behaviors that undermine trust within a team.
  • Explain the consequences of a team that does not trust its leader in terms of patient safety.
  • Describe strategies team members can use to build trust among one another in terms of skill, knowledge, and responsibility.
  • Describe principles of effective interprofessional team leadership. In other words, what skills and qualities should a good team leader possess? Is there a difference between being a good leader and being an effective leader?

Additional Requirements

  • Include a title slide and references slide.
  • Create 10–12 slides in addition to the title and references slides.
  • Use at least three current scholarly or professional resources.
  • Use APA format for references.
  • Be creative. Consider your target audience.

200 words, 2 nursing references within 5 years. MUST HAVE IN TEXT CITATIONS

  • Choose a workplace data collected quality improvement project associated with practice guidelines and discuss its congruency with an established published guideline by a reliable database (e.g. standardize regulatory organizations, certification boards, professional organizations, etc.).
  • Discuss how the published reliable database guideline gathered its data (e.g. quantitative –  survey; correlational research; treend analysis; exploratory research; descriptive research; experimental research and newest “observational-interventional research, etc.” in comparison to the workplace quality improvement project data collection.
  • Remember not to identify the health organization by name or provide guidelines with organization’s name.

Health & Human Services

The chosen topic is listed below.  The outline and annotated bibliography are attached.  Can be done in either a research paper format, or in powerpoint format.

The Final Project should demonstrate an understanding of the reading assignments, class discussions, your own research and the application of new knowledge.  It should utilize previous skills developed in foundational health care courses and apply them within the context and viewpoint of  a health care administrator and their role in managing health and human services.

For the Final Project, select one of the following topics and conduct scholarly and professional research while integrating the course’s learning outcomes to address a selected topic:

  • Examine the financial characteristics of health care delivery along with managing costs, revenues, and human resources.
  • Research RequirementsAcademic research and papers must meet certain standards of quality that are recognized by the academic community.  What constitutes quality academic research?
    • The use of primary (original), credible sources written by experts in the field of study.
    • Ensuring secondary sources are supported by research in primary sources.
    • Making sure all research is relevant and that material used is pertinent to the area of study.
    • In graduate work, the use of peer-reviewed journal articles (journal articles reviewed by recognized experts in the relevant field of study) is required.
    • Keep in mind that educational websites may be appropriate, in some cases, but should be evaluated carefully.
    The Ashford University Library offers many excellent databases and other resources to assist you in conducting scholarly research.What sources are not acceptable for academic research and referencing?
    • Encyclopedias
    • Dictionaries
    • Wikipedia, other wikis, or blogs
    • Websites and other sources that do not provide quality researched materials (e.g., they do not use credible sources to support the information in the document).
    All research must reflect professional academic protocol and must be documented according to APA standards as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center. 

For the course project you have been assuming the role of a consultant who has been hired to evaluate a clinical mental health counseling program that provides services in your community or region.You are creating a hypothetical but plausible program with hypothetical stakeholders clients interventions and measures. And you are developing plans for an evaluation that will guide program improvements and document progress toward the program’s mission and goals.For this assignment in Unit 8 use the template linked in Resources to describe the evaluation design you chose the measures of outcomes that you have selected your data collection and analysis plans and how you plan to assure reliability validity and credibility of your data and your analysis.To achieve a successful project experience and outcome you must include the following sections for Part 2:Additionally your paper must:Make sure to use the template (link in Resources) for this assignment.