• Read chapters 7 & 8
  • Research current events depicting intellectual property violations. Find an event or a case that can answer all of the following questions under #3.
  • Initial Post
    • Provide the name of your source – Only use trusted sources – Do not use Wikipedia, answers.com, Huffington posts, Washington posts, or other similar sites – if you use a website, and it displays too many adds, it is most likely not a trusted source
    • Provide an overview of the issue at hand
    • Summarize how the violation was handled
    • Share applicable financial information (for example: Company Y lost $X in sales) – If your case doesn’t have this information, find another case.
    • Analyze the legal ramifications of the situation and discuss concepts from the class that relate to the violation.
    • Support your response with at least one credible reference.
      • Note: Citations may be in text to accompany the audio submission.
    • Don’t forget to cite correctly, -2 points for incorrect citation
Go through the below content and write a minimum of 200-word content as a reply.  
Differences in Customer Taste and Preferences
Consumer preferences are defined as the individual tastes of the different goods’ different bundles as measured by the utility. They require such packages of products to be rated by the customer according to the degree of usefulness they have. The preferences are income- and price-independent. The opportunity to purchase products does not decide the desire or hate of a customer. One may choose Porsches to Ford but have just the financial resources to operate a Ford. The advantages of understanding the taste of the customer and building a better understanding of the tastes and incomes of individuals are significant because they have a significant impact on the demand curve, the relationship between the price of a good or service and the quantity demanded over a given period and the shape of the economy as a whole (Hill &Hult, 2020). There are various difficulties in creating a realistic solution for that case. As behavioral economics demonstrates, people are not necessarily logical and sometimes oblivious to the available choices for starters. Some decisions are incredibly difficult to make, as consumers do not know the products. The decision-making mechanism may also contain an emotional dimension that cannot be captured in an economic role. The various claims made by market philosophy indicate it has come under intense scrutiny. Although the conclusions may be right in an ideal future, there are, in fact, multiple variables that may reveal the mechanism of simplifying spending patterns as faulty (Hill &Hult, 2020).
Mass customization is often done through modularity and standardization for more complex products. With modular product design, several main modules and a selection of varieties are supplied for each model so consumers can mix and match and create their goods. A prime example of this pattern is the Dell machine. Some of the leading automakers are also pursuing this strategy (Moutoussis, 2016). Carmakers such as Volkswagen, Ford, General Motors, Nissan, Honda, and Peugeot, regarded as the 3DayCar initiative, set out to see how the Dell concept could be adapted to car-making. The output is split down into subprocesses using a flexible process to ensure versatility. As the analysis of product modularity and assembly adds additional uncertainty to the issue, we concentrate on the one-dimensional customization found in many industries to equate the mass customization method with the mass production framework. If the various attributes are independent in demand and production, a multidimensional problem can be decomposed into multiple one-dimensional problems. Active readers may respond to multidimensional, vertically differentiated product characteristics that are customer specific (Mühlbacher, 2016).
Considering that buyers are typically presented with an option between a range of branded and non-branded goods, we believe that assessments of non-branded preference sets are skewed due to the greater experimental focus on the non-branded product. In other words, alternative-specific constants and interaction parameters are biased upwards, and attribute parameters are biased downwards, implying that in the absence of brand-specific information, respondents tend to make their purchase decisions primarily based on essential product characteristics rather than each credential attribute. A bundle of credence attributes, however, impacts their preferences in favor of the alternative product. Additionally, heterogeneity parameters are skewed upward due to enhanced complexity due to a lack of product brand knowledge. The marked and or non-marked product preferences are affected by the introduction of credentials into the product. In general, the results of the chosen credentials on non-branded goods are more robust, suggesting that credentials have a detrimental net mark impact on brand value. Additional knowledge of non-branded products improves reputation and decreases confusion regarding certain product quality(Mühlbacher, 2016).
An essential first step in identifying consumers’ relatively stable characteristics that affect the perceived value of mass customized products. Results suggest that product categories’ involvement provides an informative framework for examining consumer value for mass customized products and a meaningful way to segment markets for custom goods. Also, the three individual differential characteristics offer insight into market conditions where mass customization will succeed and those where it may fail. In practice, consumer-based research on mass customization lags far behind mass customization (Mühlbacher, 2016).
Consequently, marketing analysts and marketing professionals alike will profit from further inquiry into this critical subject. Marketing communications promoting attribute-level toolkits for early adopters would probably do well to incorporate information-rich messages that emphasize the benefits of a product in optimizing performance outcomes, enhancing its esthetic appeal, and matching the symbolic meaning with the consumer’s expressive desires. Companies may benefit from providing dynamic, attribute-based toolkits to innovators with a high degree of participation (Schindler, 2017).
Required Readings

SOCW 6361 Webliography
These websites will be required throughout the semester. Become familiar with these websites, especially when doing research for your assignments.

Community Toolbox. (2016). Chapter 8 Section 6: Obtaining feedback from constituents: What change is feasible? Retrieved from http://ctb.ku.edu/en/table-of-contents/structure/strategic-planning/obtain-constituent-feedback/main 

Community Toolbox. (2016). 12. Evaluating the Initiative. Retrieved from http://ctb.ku.edu/en/evaluating-initiative 

Jansson, B. S. (2018). Becoming an effective policy advocate: From policy practice to social justice  (8th ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole Cengage Learning Series.
Chapter 14, “Assessing Policy: Toward Evidence-Based Policy During Task 8” (pp. 488-503)

Midgley, J., & Livermore, M. M. (Eds.) (2008). The handbook of social policy (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Chapter 33, “The Future of Social Policy” (pp. 557–569) (PDF)

English, D. J., Brummel, S., & Martens, P. (2009). Fatherhood in the child welfare system: Evaluation of a pilot project to improve father involvement. Journal of Public Child Welfare, 3(3), 213–234.

Swank, E. W. (2012). Predictors of political activism among social work students. Journal of Social Work Education,48(2), 245–266.

Required Media

TEDx Talks. (2016, May 12). Problem-oriented policing: Where social work meets law enforcement: Derrick Jackson. [Video file]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wK8glFZuQw8

Optional Resources

MSW home page
Use this link to access the MSW home page, which provides resources for your social work program.

Discussion 1: Policies and the Influence of Values

Ideology, politics, and the influence of values often override evidence-based policy. When there is evaluation conflict, a policy advocate must be prepared to defend his/her reasons for wanting to implement a policy. Because almost all proposed policies are circumscribed by politics (for reasons brought up by Jansson throughout the course when discussing the subtleties of policy implementation), you should be prepared for some conflict, ranging from having your research ignored, to having the accuracy of your data questioned, to having your personal values brought into question.
In this Discussion, you consider the assertion that the evaluation of specific policies is often strongly influenced by values. You also examine and evaluate ways to mitigate evaluation conflict to defend the feasibility of your policy.

By Day 3

Post a response to Jansson’s assertion that evaluating specific policies is strongly influenced by values with respect to the case of the evaluation of special services. How do the values of evaluation conflict adhere to social work values? What practices would you use to defend the feasibility of and effectiveness of your evidence-based policy?

Ethical considerations are important to guarantee the safety of research subjects and increase the inclusiveness of research study.  To address the drug abuse pandemic in the county, I had introduced a program that will implement interventions for early detection and follow-up services for impacted individuals. Studies have shown that detection and early intervention are the most effective way to help someone with substance abuse problem and prevent exacerbation of condition (Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, 2016). Treatments of substance use disorders are cost-effective compared with no treatment, thus treatment plan can include medications, behavioral therapies, and recovery support services (Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, 2016). It is evident that additional screening tools during admission and follow-up services after discharge can positively impact the quality and health outcomes of impacted patients.
Potential benefit is the early detection and treatment of individuals with drug use disorders. Individuals can receive appropriate treatment and follow-up for additional services that can help improve overall quality of life and health outcomes. Possible harms can be the possible stigmatization of individuals receiving such follow-up and treatment. People might be reluctant to join such programs because of stigma connected to receiving such treatment. I need to analyze my personal views and beliefs related to drug use disorders and minimize my implicit biases to stereotypes, which can negatively impact the implementation of intervention in my practice setting.  A study showed that professionals with more than 20 years of experience granted less importance on ethical values such as respect for the person and confidentiality, especially in primary care (Fernandez-Deito, Longo, & Hoyuelos, 2017). It is essential to be updated with cultural and ethical competencies in dealing with diverse patient population and research planning in any health care setting.
Objections might be raised when considering the vulnerable population related to drug use disorders. It is essential to give and receive consent regarding the possible harms and potential benefits of the research study. It is important that the consent be written in a level and language that the participant understands to avoid confusion and pressure to complete the research.  The inclusion in the study can bring stigmatization to participants and can potentially affect other aspects in life, but receiving such treatment and follow-up services can possibly improve the quality and health outcomes of participants.
References
Fernandez-Feito, A., Longo, M., & Hoyuelos, S. (2017). How work setting and job experience affect professional nurses’ values. Retrieved from https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/0969733017700238
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. (2016). Facing addiction in America: The Surgeon general’s report on alcohol, drugs, and health. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK424859/v

Submit four sources you will review while researching your paper. You paper will require three referenced resources; selecting four now will ensure you have options to include in your final paper. This assignment is worth 20 points.
Due by the end of Week 2.
Check out these Evans Library Research Guides for assistance:

When looking for information about a particular issue, how often do you try to resist biases toward your own point of view? This assignment asks you to engage in this aspect of critical thinking.
The assignment is divided into two (2) parts.
For Part I of the assignment (due Week 3), you read a critical thinking process: “The Believing Game and How to Make Conflicting Opinions More Fruitful” by Peter Elbow. , reviewed the Procon.org Website in order to gather information, and engaged in prewriting to examine your thoughts.
* Remember that in the Week 2 Discussion, you examined the biases discussed in Chapter 2 of the webtext.
In Part II of the assignment (due Week 5), you will write a paper to synthesize your ideas.
Part II – Writing
Write at three to four (3-4) page paper in which you:

  1. State your position on the topic you selected for Assignment 1.1.
  2. Identify (3) three premises (reasons) from the Procon.org website that support your position and explain why you selected these specific reasons.
  3. Explain your answers to the “believing” questions about the three (3) premises opposing your position from the Procon.org website.
  4. Examine at least two (2) types of biases that you likely experienced as you evaluated the premises for and against your position.
  5. Discuss the effects of your own enculturation or group identification that may have influenced your biases.
  6. Discuss whether or not your thinking about the topic has changed after playing the “Believing Game,” even if your position on the issue has stayed the same.

Psychology homework help
Assignment 1: Review of the Literature
In Module 1, you learned about the literature review process, which you will employ as part of your final research proposal in M5 Assignment 2 RA 2. In preparation for writing this literature review, in M3 Assignment 2 RA 1, you will submit an annotated bibliography of 6 peer-reviewed articles from the Argosy University online library resources and locate articles related to the topic of your research in the following categories:
· 2 quantitative studies
· 2 qualitative studies
· 1 mixed-methods study
· 1 theoretical or research design of your choice
As you work toward your discussion in this module, start searching the library databases for articles that may be a good fit for your M3 Assignment 2 RA 1and M5 Assignment 2 RA 2.
Then, in this module’s discussion, consider the following:
A strong literature review not only plays a foundational role for setting up a research proposal and/or dissertation but also plays an important role in the results and discussion section that is presented after the data has been collected and analyzed.
· Why is the literature review a needed piece of a research proposal? How can a weak literature review diminish a research proposal?
· Once the data has been collected and you are moving into the completion of the research report, how will you continue to pull from your literature review in the results and discussion section of your report?
· What search strategies did you use to locate articles from the Argosy University online library resources for your upcoming RAs?
Review the points of others and add additional examples, challenging a response or drawing conclusions from the response.
Post your response in a minimum of 300 words.
All written assignments and responses should follow APA rules for attributing sources.
Submission Details:
· By the due date assigned, post your responses to this Discussion Area.
· Through the end of the module, respond to at least two of your classmates’ posts. While responding, compare the similarities and differences between what you have constructed and what your classmates have.

Grading Criteria Maximum Points
Quality of initial posting, including fulfillment of assignment instructions 16
Quality of responses to classmates 12
Frequency of responses to classmates 4
Reference to supporting readings and other materials 4
Language and grammar 4
Total: 40

· M2 Assignment 2 Submission
Assignment


Top of Form

·
Assignment
1:
Review
of
the
Literature
In
Module
1
, you learned about the literature review process, which you
will employ as part of your
final research proposal in
M5
Assignment
2
RA
2
. In preparation for writing this literature review, in
M3
Assignment
2
RA
1
, you will submit an annotated bibliography of 6 peer

reviewed
articles from the Argosy University online library resources and locat
e
articles related to the topic of your research in the following categories:
·
2 quantitative studies
·
2 qualitative studies

Writing Assignment
Instructions
People often say that in America if you work hard then you will make it. As sociologists, we know that some of the hardest working people have a very difficult time just making their ends meet every day and certainly are not “making it” in terms of success often portrayed in popular culture. Please review this table of wealth distribution in America.
Write a short (1-page) essay, describing the table and the actual wealth distribution in America.
Describe the discrepancies between what people say that the wealth distribution looks like, what they think (their perceptions of) the wealth distribution should look like, and then what it actually is.
Please use the information from the table to either refute or support the idea that hard work pays off for all people in America (society as a meritocracy).
Be sure to take into account various types of inequalities (e.g., race, gender) in your answer.
Do not use outside sources, but apply your own sociological imagination using your own words.
attachment
wanow.pdf

 Psychology homework help
 
Diagnosing Young Children
0 unread of 0 messages
View Full Description
As you have learned this week, diagnosing psychiatric disorders in children is a tricky business. Mental health professionals must consider many factors when diagnosing, not the least of which is what might happen if a child were to be misdiagnosed.
1. What effect might misdiagnosis have on children lives?
One recent hot controversy in the field of child psychiatry/psychology is over the prevalence of Bipolar disorder in young children and teens. Trust me when I tell you that there are competent professionals on both side of the fence who feel very strongly about this issue.
Please click on the link below and carefully read the articles:
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/09/28/60minutes/main3308525.shtml
Obviously, something went wrong with the treatment of Rebecca Riley. Rather than focusing on this specific case, however, I’d like for us to discuss the larger issue related to the benefits and risks of diagnosing and treating young children with psychiatric disorders (e.g., ADHD, Conduct Disorder, Bipolar, Depression, etc…). Try to argue on both the “pro” and the “con” side.
2. Why should or should not we diagnose young children?
3. What age is “too young” to diagnose, or is there no age limit?
4. What are the cons of giving diagnoses too young to children?
5. What are the pros and cons of using psychiatric medication with young children?
Support your opinions with research, not just on “word of mouth” or personal experience.
300 Level Forum Grading Rubric
Possible points
Student points
Met initial post deadline (Wednesday)
10
Initial post is substantive
10
Initial post is at least 300 words
10
Initial post employs at least two citations; one can be text; other must be from an academic   source
10
LESSON READING
Introduction
In this lesson, we will look at how the great variations in children’s behaviors evolve. We will achieve this by looking at how morality develops, and the behavioral, cognitive and emotional aspects of morality. We will explore how prosocial and altruistic behaviors develop, and then how aggression develops in children, and how to alleviate it. Thereafter we will investigate developmental psychopathology. We will look at the three major categories of childhood disorders: undercontrolled disorders, overcontrolled disorders and pervasive developmental disorders.
Morality
Why do some children bully, lie and cheat, while others withdraw, and yet others excel and thrive? To understand why there is such a great variation in children’s behavior, we need to look at how children are socialized. Recall that the role of socialization is to impart desirable values onto children, which they internalize, so they can experience satisfaction when they abide by social rules, and discomfort when they do not. This personal standard of conduct can be referred to as morality.
Morality has three components that help us understand how aggression and altruism develop. The cognitive component of morality is the knowledge of what is good and bad, the emotional component is how individuals feel about situations and decisions they make, and the behavioral component of morality is how individuals behave.
Cognitive Aspects of Moral Development
Piaget and Kohlberg saw moral reasoning as a function of cognitive development.
Piaget (1932) proposed that children pass through three stage of moral development.
PREMORAL 
MORAL REALISM
MORAL RECIPROCITY
Kohlberg (1969, 1985) refined and expanded on Piaget’s theory, proposing that people go through six stages of moral development.
PRECONVENTIONAL MORALITY, STAGE 1
PRECONVENTIONAL MORALITY, STAGE 2
CONVENTIONAL MORALITY, STAGE 3
CONVENTIONAL MORALITY, STAGE 4
POSTCONVENTIONAL MORALITY, STAGE 5
POSTCONVENTIONAL MORALITY, STAGE 6
Check out this video on Kohlberg’s famous moral dilemma:
Now watch this video to see how different aged children reason:
Social Conventions
Social conventions include rules of etiquette such as table manners, forms of greeting and address, and dress codes. Studies have found that from a young age – around three years old – children can differentiate between morality and social conventions (Turiel, 2006). Cross-cultural studies have shown that from the age of three, children consistently see moral violations as harming others, and social convention violations as disruptive or impolite; furthermore, social conventions are seen as relative while moral rules do not change across cultures (Helwig, 2006; Turiel, 2006; Wainryb, 2006).
Interestingly, teenagers generally agree that parents may regulate their moral behavior, but not social convention issues, such as their spending habits, dress code and friends (Smetana, 1995, 2005).
Behavioral Aspects of Moral Development
· MORAL JUDGEMENT AND BEHAVIOR
· SELF-REGULATION
· MORAL SELF
· DISCIPLINE TECHNIQUES
A child’s moral judgement is not always consistent with their moral behavior because behavior can be irrational and impulsive. As age increases, moral judgement and moral behavior becomes more consistent. Parents and other socializing agents can enhance children’s moral behavior by using democratic reasoning and explanation as a form of discipline, as well as discussions about people’s feelings (Hoffman, 2000; Parke, 1977; Walker, Hennig, & Krettenauer, 2000).
Emotional Aspects of Morality
When people believe that they have violated a moral code, they generally feel shame, guilt and remorse. Research has shown that females feel more guilt than males, which may be attributable to gender stereotypes in which females are expected to be more dependent, submissive and prosocial (Zahn-Waxler, 2000). Children who feel more guilt and shame also experience more fear and are inhibited. Children who do not experience guilt and shame are fearless and are not deterred from violating rules.

Nursing Theory PowerPoint Presentation.

This is a group project this is my part… 

Lydia Hall The 3 Cs Nursing Theory. (im doing the CORE, and the strengths and weakness of the whole theory)

WIKI Project Guideline:

          1    4 to 6 slides plus a reference slide  on the nursing theory (THE CORE & the strengths and the weakness) 

  2    responsible to create 2-3 voice-over PPT (FEMALE VOICE) slides on their designated topic area.

  3Please note that APA format is required within the PowerPoint presentation. Reference slides are required at the end of the presentation.

This assignment will be graded according to the following rubric:

Criteria Points

WIKI content                                                   8

APA in-text citation and reference page         4

Multimedia Inclusion                                       3

Total                                                               15