Question Description

InstructionsUsing the same Nursing Theory as Module 3, complete an evaluation of the theory you select as it applies to contemporary nursing. Use the following questions as subheadings; use narrative writing, and follow APA writing guidelines, including acknowledgement of sources. For each question determine if this was a strength or weakness of the theory.You must have a title page and a reference page. The evaluation outline is adapted from the Synthesized Method for Theory Evaluation, McEwen & Wills (2014), p.108. Do not answer with “yes” or “no” responses.

Support your responses with a minimum of (three) references. You may use the course textbook as one of your references, as applicable.

you must check your assignment within one hour after submission. If the assignment is blank or incorrect you must email your coach within that one hour or you will receive a zero on the assignment.

Part II: Theory Analysis

● Are concepts theoretically and operationally defined? Describe.

● Are statements theoretically and operationally defined? Describe.

● Is there a model/diagram? Does the model contribute to clarifying the theory? Explain.

● Are outcomes or consequences stated or predicted?

FYI- By submitting this paper, you agree: (1) that you are submitting your paper to be used and stored as part of the SafeAssign™ services in accordance with the Blackboard Privacy Policy; (2) that your institution may use your paper in accordance with your institution’s policies; and (3) that your use of SafeAssign will be without recourse against Blackboard Inc. and its affiliates.

Also see below

Students,

I was disappointed in the overall grades for the assignments this week. Several of you did not use APA to format your papers nor use the example provided at the beginning of the course. The students that did use those resources received high grades because they were able to meet the criteria of the assignment.

For week 4, make sure you use APA for your papers. Address the strengths and weaknesses of each question. The example provided demonstrates how the paper should be set up with headings.

Read the comments on your papers. If you did not format your paper at all I only wrote on the paper not in APA.

Make sure the references you are using are peer reviewed and within 5 years unless it is a classic. The most common peer reviewed resources are books and journals. Websites are not peer reviewed, especially websites. Slideshare is not a peer reviewed source. Stay with books and journals for your references.

Prepare for interprofessional stakeholders a 10–12-slide presentation  (not including title and reference pages) explaining how nurse leaders  can use information technology to improve nursing practices that support  and sustain positive patient outcomes. You do not need to actually  present your assessment but be sure to include speaker’s notes for each  slide.

The dissemination of evidence-based practice outcomes helps nurses  build stakeholder engagement and support for the use of information  system and technology for health care delivery.

For this assessment, imagine a group of interprofessional  stakeholders involved with patient care in your health care setting  would like to increase positive patient outcomes. Nurse leaders have  recommended changes in the practice that incorporate informatics and the  application of new knowledge into your nursing practices.

You are asked to present a brief overview using PowerPoint (or some  other presentation software) to a small group of student nurses. After  the session has concluded, the training department would like to use  your presentation as a training resource.

Preparation

Select a nursing practice in your own health care setting that has changed for the better since you first began nursing.

Directions

Use the tools in your presentation software to develop a creative  and engaging presentation. Use the notes portion of PowerPoint to  capture your narrative script for each slide. Include the following in  your presentation:

  • Describe briefly an example of a nursing practice that has changed in the last two years.
  • Explain how theory development, research exploration, and information technology supports the changes you have described.
  • Describe the basic differences between research (qualitative and quantitative) and evidence-based practice (EBP).
  • Explain how nurse leaders use communication practices and  technology to build interprofessional stakeholder engagements in support  of the change you have identified.
  • Describe how nurse leaders use evidence-based practice to support and sustain patient-care outcomes.

Additional Requirements

  • Length: Submit a presentation of 10–12 slides  (not including title and reference slides). Include both a title slide  and a reference slide with 4–6 references to support your presentation  information and ideas.
  • Formatting Guidelines: Create streamlined slides with minimal information.      
    • Be precise.
    • Keep bulleted content on one line.
    • Use images instead of words when appropriate.
  • Narrative Script: Use the notes portion to create a detailed narrative for each slide.

Nursing post, 300 words min, 1 scholarly source (5 years or less), APA format.
*** for the hypothetical example, use one that is nursing related***
post
………………………………………………………………….

  • Distinguish between statistical and clinical significance of results.
  • Would it be possible to have research study results that supported the acceptance of the null hypothesis and demonstrate clinical significance? Provide a hypothetical example that supports your answer.
  • If you question the credibility of the results from a qualitative study, would the information have clinical significance for your practice area? Why or why not? Provide a hypothetical example that supports your answer.

Managed Care

In the United States, managed care is becoming an increasingly popular method of administering healthcare. It influences the clinical behavior of providers, as it combines the payment and delivery of healthcare into a single system, the purpose of which is to control the cost, quality, and access of healthcare services for a single bracket of health plan enrollees (Scutchfield, Lee, & Patton, 1997).

Yet, managed care often evokes strong or negative reactions from healthcare providers because they are paid a fixed amount for treating their patients, regardless of the actual cost, which may influence their level of efficiency. This can challenge the relationships between doctors and patients (Claxton, Rae, Panchal, Damico, & Lundy, 2012; Sekhri, 2000).

Research managed care’s inception and study some examples. Be sure to investigate the perspectives about managed care from the vantage of both healthcare providers and patients. You can use the following keywords for your research—United States managed care, history of managed care, and managed care timeline.

Based on your research, answer the following questions in a 8- to 10-page Microsoft Word document:

  • What are the positive and negative aspects of managed care? Analyze the benefits and the risks for both providers and patients, and how providers should choose among managed care contracts. Conclude with your analysis and recommendations for managed care health plans. Your response should include answers to the following questions:
    • Summarize the history of when, how, and why managed care was developed.
    • Define and discuss each type of managed care organization (MCO)—health maintenance organization (HMO), preferred provider organization (PPO), and point of sale (POS).
    • Explain the positive and negative aspects, respectively, of managed care organization from the provider’s point of view—a physician and a healthcare facility—and from a patient’s point of view.
    • Explain the three types of incentives for providers for efficiency in the delivery of healthcare services. Explain who bears the financial risk—the provider, the patient, or the managed care organization.
    • Offer your recommendations, to accept or decline, for patients considering managed care health plans, with your rationale for each.

References:

Claxton, G., Rae, M., Panchal, N., Damico, A., & Lundy, J. (2012). Employer Health

Benefits Annual 2012 Survey. Retrieved from http://ehbs.kff.org/pdf/2012/

8345.pdf

Sekhri, N. K. (2000). Managed care: The US experience. Retrieved from http://www.

who.int/bulletin/archives/78%286%29830.pdf

Scutchfield F. D., Lee, J., & Patton, D. (1997). Managed care in the United States.

Journal of Public Health Medicine19(3), 251–254. Retrieved from http://

jpubhealth.oxfordjournals.org/content/19/3/251.full.pdf

Support your responses with examples.

PICOT/Evidence Appraisal Assignment

Rubric

NR439_PICOT_Worksheet
NR439_PICOT_Worksheet
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePICOT question

Question or nursing problem is identified and is an independent nursing decision.

50.0 pts

Outstanding Question or nursing problem identified that is an independent nursing decision

44.0 pts

Very good Question or nursing problem is identified that is an independent nursing decision

40.0 pts

Competent Question or nursing problem is identified that is an independent nursing decision.

19.0 pts

Question or nursing problem is identified but is not an independent nursing decision.

0.0 pts

PICOT question missing.
50.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePICOT elements

PICOT elements are correctly identified. Outcomes are measurable.

50.0 pts

PICOT elements are correctly identified. Outcomes are measurable.

44.0 pts

One PICOT element is not correctly identified. Outcomes are measurable. PICOT/Evidence Appraisal Assignment

40.0 pts

Two PICOT elements are not correctly identified. Outcomes are not measurable

19.0 pts

Three or more PICOT elements are not correctly identified. Outcomes are not measurable.

0.0 pts

PICOT elements are missing.
50.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePractice issue and scope of the problem

Practice issue/problem is thoroughly described. The need for change is evident. Practice area is identified. Identification of the practice issue is clear. Scope of the problem is identified.

50.0 pts

Practice issue/problem is thoroughly described. The need for change is evident. Practice area is identified. Identification of the practice issue is clear. Scope of the problem is identified.

44.0 pts

Practice issue/problem is partially described. The need for change is evident. Practice area is identified. Identification of the practice issue is clear. Scope of the problem is identified.

40.0 pts

Practice issue/problem is vaguely described. The need for change is not obvious. Practice area is identified. Identification of the practice issue is clear. Scope of the problem is identified.

19.0 pts

Practice issue/problem is vaguely described. The need for change is not obvious. Practice area is not identified. Identification of the practice issue is not clear. Scope of the problem is not identified

0.0 pts

Not answered.
 PICOT/Evidence Appraisal Assignment
PICOT/Evidence Appraisal Assignment
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEvidence

Appropriately identifies the types of evidences that should be gathered.

20.0 pts

Identifies and documents four types of evidence needed for review.

17.0 pts

Identifies and documents three types of evidence needed for review.

16.0 pts

Identifies and documents two types of evidence needed for review

7.0 pts

Identifies and documents one type of evidence needed for review.

0.0 pts

Does not document types of evidence.
20.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRationale for Evidence

Gives rationale for the types of evidence that is gathered.

20.0 pts

Thoroughly describes rationale for checked types of evidence.

17.0 pts

Good description of rationale for checked types of evidence.

16.0 pts

Partial description of rationale for checked types of evidence.

7.0 pts

Minimal rationale for checked types of evidence.

0.0 pts

Rationale missing.
20.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSearch Terms

Describes search terms that are manageable and will yield good results.

5.0 pts

Thoroughly describes manageable search terms.

4.0 pts

Good description of manageable search terms.

3.0 pts

Partially describes manageable search terms.

2.0 pts

Minimally describes manageable search terms.

0.0 pts

Search terms are absent.
5.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeHow to Narrow Search in the Library

Provides a description of how the library search will be narrowed to produce relevant returns.
PICOT/Evidence Appraisal Assignment

5.0 pts

Thoroughly describes how to narrow searchFull Marks

4.0 pts

Good description how to narrow search.

3.0 pts

Partially describes how to narrow search.

2.0 pts

Minimally describes how to narrow search.

0.0 pts

No description given.
5.0 pts
Total Points: 200.0. PICOT/Evidence Appraisal Assignment

 

This is a Collaborative Learning Community assignment
A  group of seven individuals embarked on a weeklong cruise aboard a  chartered luxury yacht. On the third day, a severe storm caused the  yacht to run aground on a deserted island. Aside from minor scratches  and bruises, all crew and passengers escaped serious injury.  Unfortunately, the yacht was damaged beyond repair. Furthermore, the  yacht’s only radio was damaged. It can receive messages but can no  longer transmit messages. After several days, they hear over the radio  that the effort to locate and rescue them had been abandoned. The group  is presumed dead. The island is uninhabited. There is sufficient  vegetation and fresh water to sustain them indefinitely. Despite the  outside world’s assumption that they are dead, the group has resolved to  find a way to return home. In the meantime, they must prepare for a  life together on the island.
Use the file titled “Selecting a Leader” to complete the following:

  1. Individually  rank the applicants and report your ranking to the group with one to  four sentences explaining how you determined your ranking.
  2. As  a group, come to consensus as to a ranking of the applicants using one  to four sentences for each applicant. Be sure to present your reasoning  based on criteria established by the group.
  • attachment

    COM-222.R.SelectingaLeader_3-31-14.docx

QUESTION

nursing

  1. Read the scenario below.
  2. Respond to the questions in full sentences. Be sure to use standard English grammar and spelling
    1. What biological, psychological, physical environmental, sociocultural, behavioral, and health system factors are influencing this situation?
    2. Is this a crisis situation? If so, what type of crisis would this be?
    3. What nursing interventions will you employ with this family?
    4. How might your interventions be different if you find that many families in the population are experiencing similar problem?

For your sixth discussion board, you are going to begin planning for your upcoming argumentative essay, Essay 3. Since you will need to choose a controversial issue in your academic pathway to focus on, research will play a vital role in your argument. Respond to the prompts below in order to create a research proposal that will provide you direction and a strong basis for your writing. In addition, I will have the opportunity to look over your progress and help guide you toward an even stronger writing project. What is the working title for your essay? Explain your interest in this topic. In other words, why did you choose this subject to write on (beyond it simply being in your field of study)? What is the tentative claim/thesis of your essay? You should express this idea in 1-2 sentences, so make sure that your claim is as specific as possible. (Note: This argument may alter in scope and focus as you progress; you are not wholly committed to it.) How will your research and writing help to inform and/or benefit your audience? In other words, what is the larger goal of arguing about this topic? List at least two main sides of your argument (i.e., for and against). Remember that knowing and considering the counterarguments of your claim can help you to write conscientiously about your issue. Describe at least 3 specific sources that you have consulted, including relevant library databases, (credible) websites, popular and/or scholarly periodicals, books, etc. Make sure to provide specific information about your sources like titles, authors, locations, and dates of publication.

For your sixth discussion board, you are going to begin planning for your upcoming argumentative essay, Essay 3. Since you will need to choose a controversial issue in your academic pathway to focus on, research will play a vital role in your argument. Respond to the prompts below in order to create a research proposal that will provide you direction and a strong basis for your writing. In addition, I will have the opportunity to look over your progress and help guide you toward an even stronger writing project.

  1. What is the working title for your essay?
  2. Explain your interest in this topic. In other words, why did you choose this subject to write on (beyond it simply being in your field of study)?
  3. What is the tentative claim/thesis of your essay? You should express this idea in 1-2 sentences, so make sure that your claim is as specific as possible. (Note: This argument may alter in scope and focus as you progress; you are not wholly committed to it.)
  4. How will your research and writing help to inform and/or benefit your audience? In other words, what is the larger goal of arguing about this topic?
  5. List at least two main sides of your argument (i.e., for and against). Remember that knowing and considering the counterarguments of your claim can help you to write conscientiously about your issue.
  6. Describe at least 3 specific sources that you have consulted, including relevant library databases, (credible) websites, popular and/or scholarly periodicals, books, etc. Make sure to provide specific information about your sources like titles, authors, locations, and dates of publication.
Overview
Refer to the functional model you verified and validated for ABS in the Week 4 assignment to complete this assignment.
Based on your performance, ABS management was so satisfied that it wants you to develop both the structural and behavior models. This way, ABS can fully understand both the interaction that would take place between the users and the system and the system itself in greater detail.
Note: You may create and/or assume all necessary assumptions needed for the completion of this assignment.

Instructions

Write a 4–5 page paper in which you:

  1. Create Class-Responsibility-Collaboration (CRC) cards and a class diagram based on the functional models through the use of graphical tools in Microsoft Word or Visio, or an open-source alternative such as Dia. Note: The graphically depicted solution is not included in the required page length.
  2. Identify each use case in the functional model and create a sequence and communication diagram for each scenario of each use case identified through the use of graphical tools in Microsoft Word or Visio, or an open-source alternative such as Dia. Note: The graphically depicted solution is not included in the required page length.
  3. Create a behavioral state machine for each of the complex classes in the class diagram.
  4. Perform a CRUDE analysis to show the interactivity of the objects in the system.
  5. Perform a verification and validation walk-through of each: Revise the requirements document created in Week 4 assignment, Business Process and Functional Modeling, with additional information found in this assignment and document the assumptions.
    1. Functional model.
    2. Structural model.
    3. Behavioral model.
  6. Use at least three quality resources in this assignment. Note: Wikipedia and similar websites do not qualify as quality resources.
Annotated Bibliography
Assignment Requirements:
1.A minimum of 10 references from reputable sources.
2.Proper APA format for each reference
3.A short summary (one or two sentences) for each source
4.A short description (one or two sentences) of how you plan on using the source in your final persuasive research essay.
For this assignment, an annotated bibliography consists of three parts:
1) A list of all the sources you’ve either used or consulted, like for background information, in the writing of your research essay
2) A brief summary of each source, like an abstract.
3) A brief description of how or why you plan on using each particular source in your final persuasive research essay.
See the example attached for format guidance.
The purpose of the annotated bibliography is to demonstrate not only research skill, but to show others the variety and relevance of all sources consulted or used. These types of documents help to establish an author’s credibility as an expert on his or her essay’s topic.
Finally, source reputability is very important for this assignment and for research writing in general. If you use as source that does not come from a reputable publication it will not be counted toward your minimum of ten.
Assessment Criteria:
In order for an annotated bibliography to earn an “A” it must:
Provide references in proper APA format
Include a minimum of ten sources from reputable locations
Include concise, well-written summaries of each source.
Include clear descriptions of how or why you plan on using each of those sources in your final persuasive research essay.
Produce a document with few to no minor grammatical and punctuation errors
Learning Outcomes Met:
Researching Phase:
• Identify scholarly articles and journals. Know the difference between primary and secondary sources, and scholarly journals and magazines or other non-academic sources.
• Use library databases and services to obtain sources to complete the project.
• Assess sources for usability and credibility.
• Read, analyze, synthesize, and summarize complex sources, challenging the assumptions, evidence, and fairness of the content. (Partially met.)
• Create an annotated working bibliography.
Drafting and Editing/Revising Phases:
• Use appropriate tone, level of formality, person, and tense
https://writingcenter.unc.edu/tips-and-tools/annotated-bibliographies/apa-examples/
https://owl.purdue.edu/