Management homework help

MGTU 400 Assignment 3 Handout and
Rubric
Individual Assignment 3: Moving White Collar Jobs
Length: 3-4 pages, double-spaced (Times Roman 12 font with standard 1” margins).
As with all papers and PowerPoints in this class must use APA see the
Sample APA paper and How to write a Short Paper, found in Course
Information.
Due: Week 4 Monday Midnight
Post: Week 3 Assignments folder
This paper will give you the opportunity to understand how emerging countries are
managing human capital in the tightening global labor market. According to a 2008
McKinsey Global Institute study, countries outside of the United States are presenting
an opportunity for highly qualified, cost-effective alternatives to US-educated/based
professional talent. For instance, Morocco is now home to offshore centers for French
and Spanish companies requiring fluent speakers of their home languages. Neighboring
Tunisia has used its modern infrastructure, business-friendly regulations, and stable,
low-cost workforce to attract companies such as Siemens. Vietnam offers university
graduates who have strong mathematics skills; speak French, English, German, or
Russian; and do not demand high wages. In choosing a location, companies will have to
focus less on low wages and much more on other ways that candidate cities can fulfill
their business needs. They will also have to be much more rigorous in articulating
precisely what they require from an offshore location.
This paper will allow you to explore answers to the following questions: Should we move
white-collar jobs to offshore environments? With pressures on CEOs and business
leaders of all ranks to increase shareholder value by reducing costs, one of the options
in consideration is the opportunity to move white-collar professional positions to Outside
US. You must have at least three references (total) to the Hill and Hult (2020)
coursebook, the Ascent of Money videos, your relevant website material, Wall Street
Journal, etc. citing using APA. A minimum of three academic resources should be used
in the text – published books or academic journal articles.
This paper is designed for you to compare and contrast the pros and cons of moving
white-collar jobs offshore. By comparing the two points of view, you will be able to better
understand how a company chooses (knowingly or unknowingly) to adopt a particular
position and how this decision will affect the economy of the US and the company that
receives the job influx.
Your paper will consider the following questions:
o What benefits result from the outsourcing of skilled white collar jobs to
developing nations?
o Who are the losers?
o Will developed nations like the US suffer from the loss of skilled and high
paying jobs to developing nations? Is there a difference between the
transference of high-paying white collar jobs, such as computer
programming and accounting to developing nations and low-paying bluecollar jobs?
o If so, what is the difference, and should government do anything to stop
the flow of white-collar jobs out of the country?
o Be sure to include your country of choice as one comparison to the US.
Once again, you will find very helpful information on any company that you choose on
their Websites and by researching recent press releases. Remember you cannot use
Wikipedia as a source.
Be sure you have an introduction, an analysis and a conclusion. The following describes
how this paper will be graded. The questions and comments below are designed for you
to read and consider before turning in your work.
Introduction
Does the introduction explain what the paper is about? Does it give a quick
overview of pros and cons analysis?
Analysis
Does the paper have three to five main points that are supported by references in
the text with page numbers of analyzing all of the variables?
Does the analyses connect to your introduction and conclusion and the “heart of
your hypothesis?
Conclusion
Is the conclusion a clear and concise recap of the analysis?
The conclusion cannot bring in any new ideas!
Does the conclusion tie into the first two or three sentences in thought?
Process, Punctuation and Grammar
Are all of the words spelled correctly?
Are the correct words used?
Is the wording smooth to read?
Is proper grammar used?
Does the paper follow APA Guidelines?
Is the paper interesting?
Evaluation Criteria for Moving White Collar Jobs
Paper
Elements
Exemplary
50
Proficient
40
Developing
30
Emerging
20
Introduction
& Purpose
12
Clearly describes
the shifts. Clearly
and concisely
identifies what the
rest of the paper
will contain. The
importance and
value of the shifts
are evident.
10
Describes the
shifts. Clearly
identifies what
the rest of the
paper will
contain. The
importance and
value of the
shifts are
evident.
7
Somewhat
describes the
shifts. Identifies
what the rest of
the paper will
contain. The
importance and
value of the shifts
are somewhat
evident.
5
Does not describe
the shifts. Does
not clearly and
concisely identify
what the rest of
the paper will
contain. The
importance and
value of the shifts
are not evident.
Analysis 14
Clearly and
concisely defines
key terms and
effectively
integrates the text
book and 3 or
more scholarly
sources to
comprehensively
answer questions.
Examines
appropriate
theories.
10
Fairly clearly
defines key
terms and fairly
effectively
integrates the
text book and 2
or more mostly
scholarly sources
to answer
research
questions.
Examines most
appropriate
theories.
9
Somewhat clearly
defines key terms
and somewhat
effectively uses
text book and 1
other source to
answer research
questions; some
sources may not
be scholarly.
Some examination
of theories.
5
Limited or
confusing
definition of key
terms; may not
integrate sources
to answer research
questions. Does
not cite the text
book.
Conclusions 12
Objectively
analyzes and
synthesizes
research to draw
valid conclusions
supported by
findings.
10
Fairly
objectively
analyzes and
synthesizes
research to draw
valid conclusions
supported by
findings.
7
Somewhat
analyzes and
synthesizes
research.
Conclusions may
be general and/or
have only come
support in the
findings.
5
Limited if any
analysis and
synthesis of
research. Limited
if any conclusions
drawn based on
the findings.
Writing
Mechanics
12
The paper is
logical and well10
The paper is
logical and well7
The paper is
somewhat logical
5
The paper lacks
clarity and may be
written; spelling,
grammar and
punctuation are
accurate. Paper
uses APA and is
the required length
of 3 – 4 pages of
content. The paper
uses the headings
as listed above and
shows sources to
support each of the
main points.
written but with
minor errors in
APA, spelling,
grammar and/or
punctuation. The
paper may be
10% longer or
shorter than the
required length.
The paper uses
the headings as
listed above and
shows literature
to support each
of the main
points.
and well-written;
some errors in
APA, spelling,
grammar and/or
punctuation. The
paper may be 15%
too long or short,
and may not
include all
headings and may
not show support
for all areas.
confusing with
numerous errors
in APA, spelling,
grammar and/or
punctuation. The
paper may be 20%
too long or short,
and does not
include headings
or does not show
support for all of
the areas.

/by

Nursing homework help

1) Minimum 9 full pages (Follow the 3 x 3 rule: minimum three paragraphs per part)
              Part 1: Minimum 1 page
              Part 2: minimum 3 pages
              Part 3: minimum 1 page
              Part 4: minimum 3 pages 
              Part 5: minimum 1page
           
Submit 1 document per part
2)¨******APA norms
All paragraphs must be narrative and cited in the text- each paragraphs
          Bulleted responses are not accepted
          Dont write in the first person 
Dont copy and pase the questions.
Answer the question objectively, do not make introductions to your answers, answer it when you start the paragraph
         Submit 1 document per part
3)****************************** It will be verified by Turnitin (Identify the percentage of exact match of writing with any other resource on the internet and academic sources, including universities and data banks)
********************************It will be verified by SafeAssign (Identify the percentage of similarity of writing with any other resource on the internet and academic sources, including universities and data banks)
4) Minimum 3 references per part not older than 5 years
Part 2: Minimum 6 references per part not older than 5 years (Blogs and encyclopedias are not admitted)
Part 4: Minimum 6 references per part not older than 5 years (Blogs and encyclopedias are not admitted)
5) Identify your answer with the numbers, according to the question. Start your answer on the same line, not the next
Example:
Q 1. Nursing is XXXXX
Q 2. Health is XXXX
6) You must name the files according to the part you are answering: 
Example:
Part 1.doc 
Part 2.doc 
__________________________________________________________________________________
Part 1: Community Nursing
 
You are a school nurse in a middle school when Jamal comes to the nurse’s office requesting medication for a headache. You notice that his eyes are red, and it appears as if he has been crying. You ask if he is hurt, but he denies it. The phone rings in the office, and a teacher tells you that a female student has approached her concerned about Jamal. The teacher tells you that Jamal sent her a text message saying that he flunked his biology examination and wished he was dead.
1. If Jamal shared with you a suicide plan that includes harming himself with a weapon, what would be your first nursing intervention?
2. What educational program would you develop for the middle school to educate students about ways to cope with stress and how to respond if a friend needs support?
Part 2: Community Nursing 2
Topic: Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome
 
a. Introduction (general)
b. Introduction of the disease / problem
c. Signs and symptoms and diagnosis of the disease
d. Factors that may have contributed to the emergence or reemergence of this infectious diseases
e. Mention the goals of Healthy People 2020 to reduce this infection / Prevention and control of the disease / Infection Control Guidelines.
f. CDC (priority for public health) response to this specific infectious disease
g. Thought about emerging antibiotic -resistant microorganisms
h. Role as a community health nurse
i. Explain  3 Research studies (eviewed journal articles) about Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome
j. Conclusion
Part 3: Complementary nursing
Topic:  Shamans, Faith and Prayer
 
1. Do you consider yourself a spiritual or religious person? Explain why?
2. What is the importance of your faith in your daily life?
Part 4: Crisis Nursing Intervention
Topic:   PTSD
 
1. What is PTSD?
2. Statistics
3. Diagnostic criteria / Categorization
4. Physiological Responses
5. Maladaptive Patterns
6. Interventions / Treatments (pharmacological and non-pharmacological)
7.  Other considerations in the management of _________ (including but not limited to management of behaviors, family considerations, challenges in the care of patients with this disorder.
8. conclusion
 
 
Part 5: Nursing and aging
Topic:  Mobility and Neurologic Function
1. Describing two (2) of the normal age-related changes that produce challenges in maintaining physical activity in the elderly.
a. Discuss two (2) physical activities that can enhance health in this population about point 1.
2. Identify two (2) signs and symptoms of TIA versus CVA.
a. How are your interventions the same or different?
/by

Poverty and Homelessness

M3.D4 – Discussion

Poverty and Homelessness

Instructions:

1. Please answer all the following questions:

· What facilities are available for the homeless in your community? How do people access these resources?

· What is the demographic make-up of the homeless population in your community? Primarily male or female? Family? Ethnic group?

· What is your risk of becoming homeless? What resources would you draw on if tomorrow you woke up with no job and no housing?

· What physical illnesses or disorders are specific to homeless people in your area? What are the greatest risks?

1. Your response should be 1 PAGE. 

APA Instruction:

1-Would need an Abstract. Good reference page format, citation and APT format

2- After submission, a rating of 0-15% similarity will be considered acceptable. Over 15% will not be considered acceptable.

3-NOTE:  Wikipedia is not a source to be used in any of the generated work; using it will result in a “zero” for the assignment.

/by

YOUR NURSING HOME DEFINES OUTPUT AS A PATIENT DAY. ITS PRESENT VOLUME IS 26,000 PATIENT DAYS

YOUR NURSING HOME DEFINES OUTPUT AS A PATIENT DAY. ITS PRESENT VOLUME IS 26,000 PATIENT DAYS. THE…

 NO COMMENTS
Your nursing home defines output as a patient day. Its present volume is 26,000 patient days. The average cost per day is $90.00. Present revenues and costs are presented below:
Revenues
AmountCharge Patients (6,000 Patient Days) $750,000
Fixed-Price Patients (20,000 Patient Days) $1,800,000
Total Net Revenues $2,550,000
Costs
Amount
Fixed Costs $1,170,000
Variable Costs ($45/PD) $1,170,000
Total ($90/PD) $2,340,000
Net Income $210,000
Using this information, answer the following two questions:
What is the break-even in patient days for this nursing home, assuming no profit is required?
If volume goes up 10% to 28,600 patient days and payer mix is unchanged, what will net income be?
/by

Criminal homework help

Week 3 Project – Due

Nov 15, 2020 11:59 PMMCJ6404-Political Terrorism SU01

Week 3 Project: Terrorist Tactics and Weapons

This week, you take the role of an expert serving on a commission to predict the possible tactics and weapons of a terrorist group. Choose a terrorist group other than al-Qaeda. The group you choose should have a well-defined profile and a defined strategic position.
Create a report for the commission. The report should include the following about the terrorist group you choose:

  • The terrorist group’s profile, including its goals and objectives.
  • The terrorist group’s strategic position in the country of its prevalence and in an international terrorism scenario.
  • The terrorist group’s rank in being a serious threat to international security.
  • The possible tactics and weapons used by the group and its rank vis-a-vis other terrorist groups based on the level of danger its weaponry suggests.
  • The terrorist group’s threat to innocent civilians and its rank based upon the level of danger it poses to innocent civilians.
  • The terrorist group’s similarities and differences in behavior and pattern of strategies as compared to ISIS.
  • The counterterrorism measures that can be used against this group.

Write a 4- to 5-page report in Microsoft Word. Name your file SU_MCJ6404_W3_A2_LastName_FirstInitial.doc.
Submit your document to the Submissions Area by the due date assigned.
Week 3 ProjectWeek 3 Project Due November 15 at 11:59 PM

/by

Management homework help

For this assignment, you are required to develop a small training exercise. Review your needs assessment and previous observations conducted on your work environment to help identify one area for improvement that would benefit a part of your organization. This training exercise does not need to be implemented, but should include at least one deliverable that you could use during the training exercise. As you are reviewing your organization, consider employee engagement, systems, procedures, communication, and the culture within the organization. These are suggestions for possible areas that could benefit from a training exercise. The training must include the following:

  1. What goal is the organization trying to accomplish?
  2. What processes or procedures will change after the training?
  3. Describe the strategies or actions involved in the training exercise to meet established goals. What is the expected performance or applications after the training? How will the strategies drive successful business results and improve employee performance?
  4. How will the organization provide support to the employees receiving training? To new employees? Does this support consider strengths and weaknesses within the organization?
/by

The community health RN is caring for a family with a child who has significant developmental delays. The child is 9-years-old and exhibits the development of a 6-month old infant.

The community health RN is caring for a family with a child who has significant developmental delays. The child is 9-years-old and exhibits the development of a 6-month old infant.  She can move her extremities spontaneously, hold her head up and cry out occasionally. She has a gastrostomy tube for her medications and she receives continuous tube feeding via pump.  She was discharged 2 days ago after a 5-day hospitalization for failure to thrive.  During the hospital stay, the child’s tube feeding formula was adjusted to meet her growing needs. The community health RN is monitoring the child after discharge, following up on the child’s weight and the parent’s knowledge of the new feeding formula type, amount, and schedule. Today the child weighs 64 pounds. The child’s current weight represents a 2 pound weight gain since hospital admission.

The RN has chosen the NANDA-I nursing diagnosis of Ineffective health management r/t insufficient knowledge of expected growth and calorie requirements AEB parent states, “I thought the same tube feeding would be enough calories for a long time, I don’t know how to tell if the feeding should be adjusted.”

Initial Discussion Post:

  • Compare and contrast narrative documentation with SOAP/SOAPIE/SOAPIER- style documentation.
  • Create a documentation entry to describe the community health nurse’s first visit based on this scenario using SOAP/ SOAPIE/SOAPIER-style documentation. Students may embellish the scenario with additional patient information or parent’s response to teaching if desired.
/by

Define the challenges in designing a Pay for Performance (P4P) program.

The U.S. healthcare system has been criticized for high-cost, inefficacy, and issues on quality.  P4P is an approach used to provide incentives to physicians and health care provider organizations to achieve improved performance by increasing quality of care and reducing costs.

Write a three- to five-page double-spaced paper (excluding title and reference pages), addressing the following:

Define the challenges in designing a Pay for Performance (P4P) program.
Discuss the impacts of P4P on provider payment reform.
Describe the health care providers’ reactions to Value-Based Purchasing Programs.
Determine the benefits of P4P on patients.

The Pay for Performance (P4P) assignment

Must be three to five double-spaced pages in length (not including title and references pages) and formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center. (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.
Must include a separate title page with the following:

Title of paper
Student’s name
Course name and number
Instructor’s name
Date submitted

Must include an introduction and conclusion (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. paragraph.
Must use at least three scholarly, peer-reviewed, and/or other credible sources in addition to the course text.

The Scholarly, Peer Reviewed, and Other Credible Sources (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. table offers additional guidance on appropriate source types. If you have questions about whether a specific source is appropriate for this assignment, please contact your instructor. Your instructor has the final say about the appropriateness of a specific source for a particular assignment. Be sure to integrate your research (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. rather than simply inserting it.

Must document all sources in APA style as outlined here (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. and here (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site..

Must include a separate references page (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. that is formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center. 

/by

analyze the quality outcomes and/or patient safety measures of a health care entity to determine its successes and failures, identify potential obstacles to the implementation of the measures, and determine what collaborative efforts are needed to create sustainability.

Question Description

Details:

The Quality and Sustainability Paper is a practice immersion assignment designed to be completed in three sections. This is part two of the assignment. Learners are required to analyze the quality outcomes and/or patient safety measures of a health care entity to determine its successes and failures, identify potential obstacles to the implementation of the measures, and determine what collaborative efforts are needed to create sustainability.

General Guidelines:

Use the following information to ensure successful completion of the assignment:

  • This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
  • Doctoral learners are required to use APA style for their writing assignments. The APA Style Guide is located in the Student Success Center.
  • This assignment requires that you support your position by referencing at least six to eight scholarly resources. At least three of your supporting references must be from scholarly sources other than the assigned readings.
  • You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.

Directions:

Write a 1,250-1,500 word paper that provides the following:

  1. Identify or create a health care entity. (Provide an overall description of this entity without using the real name; i.e. location, size, profit or nonprofit, years in operation). Do not give the real name of any entity or person you are describing.
  2. Using defined quality outcomes and/or patient safety measures, describe the health care entity’s successes and failures. Include identified criteria and data that demonstrate why this entity is successful and in what areas.
  3. Using the quality outcomes data, identify a quality or safety area that nursing science can impact. Describe the specific variables.
  4. Identify potential obstacles that may hinder the implementation of the quality or safety measure.
  5. Identify those groups or leadership roles within the entity with whom you may need to collaborate.
Quality and Sustainability Paper Part Two – Analysis and Application 

1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%2
Less than Satisfactory
74.00%3
Satisfactory
79.00%4
Good
87.00%5
Excellent
100.00%70.0 %Content5.0 %Completed Changes and Corrected Errors to Subsequent Paper, Including Transitions for a Scholarly PaperLearner did not attach previous paper and did not make changes as indicated.N/ALearner attached previous paper and has made changes as indicated. Learner needs to incorporate transitions to connect the ideas between the papersLearner attached previous paper and has made changes as indicated. Learner needs to incorporate better transitions to connect the ideas between the papers.Learner attached previous paper and has made changes as indicated. Learner has includes all necessary transitions to create a scholarly paper.15.0 %Description of Health Care Entity and Identification of Successes and FailuresA heath care entity is not described; the success and failures are not identified.A heath care entity is identified, but a description is not provided. Quality outcomes or patient safety measures are not utilized to identify the success and failures. Criteria and data are not used to substantiate why the entity is successful.A heath care entity is identified and an overall description is provided, but many significant details are missing. The quality measures or patient safety measures utilized fail to accurately identify the successes and failures for the health care entity. Criteria and data do not fully substantiate why the entity is successful, or in what areas.A heath care entity is identified and described, including relevant details. Quality outcomes and /or patient safety measures are utilized to identify the success and failures. Criteria and data are presented that help substantiate why the entity is successful in certain areas.A heath care entity is identified with details that provide insight into the organization. Quality outcomes or patient safety measures clearly define its success and failures. Very detailed criteria and data are presented to substantiate why the entity is successful, and in what areas.20.0 %Identification of Quality or Safety Measure That Nursing Science Can Improve, and Analysis of Supporting DataQuality or safety measure that nursing science can improve is not identified. Analysis of data is not performed.Quality or safety measure that nursing science can improve is suggested, but analysis of data is not performed.Quality or safety measure that nursing science can improve is presented, but analysis of data does not completely support claim.Quality or safety measure that nursing science can improve is presented. Analysis offers support, but more explanation is required to fully demonstrate how data supports claim.Quality or safety measure that nursing science can improve is presented. Analysis is thorough and the data presented supports claim. A very good explanation of the how the data supports the claim is provided.10.0 %Identification of Potential Obstacles to Implementation of Quality or Safety MeasuresPotential obstacles that may hinder implementation of quality or safety measures are not identified.Potential obstacles are identified, but a correlation to how these obstacles will hinder the implication of quality or safety measures is not established.Potential obstacles are identified, but a correlation to how these obstacles will hinder the implication of quality or safety measures is unclear.Potential obstacles are identified. A correlation to how these obstacles will hinder the implication of quality or safety measures is generally established.Potential obstacles are identified. A correlation of how these obstacles will hinder the implication of quality or safety measures is clearly established and shows insight.10.0 %Identification of Stakeholders and Leaders Needed for CollaborationStakeholders needed for collaboration are not identified.Stakeholders needed for collaboration are referenced, but no groups or leaders are identified.Stakeholders needed for collaboration are identified, but the roles of the groups or leaders in the implementation are unclear.Stakeholders needed for collaboration are identified, and the roles of the groups or leaders in the implementation are generally discussed.Stakeholders needed for collaboration are identified, and the roles of the groups or leaders in the implementation are generally discussed.10.0 %Six to Eight Additional Scholarly Research Sources With In-Text CitationsNone of the required elements (minimum of six topic-related scholarly research sources and six in-text citations) are present.Not all required elements are present. One or more elements are missing, or included sources are not scholarly research or topic-related.All required elements are present. Scholarly research sources are topic-related, but the source and quality of one or more references is questionable.All required elements are present. Scholarly research sources are topic-related, and obtained from reputable professional sources.All required elements are present. Scholarly research sources are topic-related, and obtained from highly respected, professional, original sources.20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness7.0 %Thesis Development and PurposePaper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.8.0 %Argument Logic and ConstructionStatement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.5.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.10.0 %Format5.0 %Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent.Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style.All format elements are correct.5.0 %Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)Sources are not documented.Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.100 %Total Weightage
/by