Nursing Research Critique Essay

Nursing Research Critique Essay

In a 1000-1,250-word nursing research critique essay, summarize the study, explain the ways in which the findings might be used in nursing practice, and address ethical considerations associated with the conduct of the study. Refer to the “Nursing Research Critique Essay Guidelines”  below for suggested headings and content for your Nursing Research Critique Essay paper. Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required. This nursing research critique essay assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion. You are required to submit this nursing research critique essay assignment to Turninit

Nursing Research Critique Essay Guidelines

Nursing Research Critique Essay – Qualitative Study

Background of Study:

  • Identify the clinical problem and research problem that led to the study. What was not known about the clinical problem that, if understood, could be used to improve health care delivery or patient outcomes?This gap in knowledge is the research problem.
  • How did the author establish the significance of the study? In other words, why should the reader care about this study? Look for statements about human suffering, costs of treatment, or the number of people affected by the clinical problem.

ORDER YOUR PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER NOW

  • Identify the purpose of the study. An author may clearly state the purpose of the study or may describe the purpose as the study goals, objectives, or aims.
  • List research questions that the study was designed to answer. If the author does not explicitly provide the questions, attempt to infer the questions from the answers.
  • Were the purpose and research questions related to the problem?

Method of Study:

  • Were qualitative methods appropriate to answer the research questions?
  • Did the author identify a specific perspective from which the study was developed? If so, what was it?
  • Did the author cite quantitative and qualitative studies relevant to the focus of the study? What other types of literature did the author include?
  • Are the references current? For qualitative studies, the author may have included studies older than the 5-year limit typically used for quantitative studies. Findings of older qualitative studies may be relevant to a qualitative study.
  • Did the author evaluate or indicate the weaknesses of the available studies?
  • Did the literature review include adequate information to build a logical argument?
  • When a researcher uses the grounded theory method of qualitative inquiry, the researcher may develop a framework or diagram as part of the findings of the study. Was a framework developed from the study findings?

 
Results of Study

  • What were the study findings?
  • What are the implications to nursing?
  • Explain how the findings contribute to nursing knowledge/science. Would this impact practice, education, administration, or all areas of nursing?

Ethical Considerations

  • Was the study approved by an Institutional Review Board?
  • Was patient privacy protected?
  • Were there ethical considerations regarding the treatment or lack of?

Conclusion

  • Emphasize the importance and congruity of the thesis statement.
  • Provide a logical wrap-up to bring the appraisal to completion and to leave a lasting impression and take-away points useful in nursing practice.
  • Incorporate a critical appraisal and a brief analysis of the utility and applicability of the findings to nursing practice.
  • Integrate a summary of the knowledge learned in the nursing research critique essay.

Nursing Research Critique Essay – Quantitative Study

Background of Study:

  • Identify the clinical problem and research problem that led to the study. What was not known about the clinical problem that, if understood, could be used to improve health care delivery or patient outcomes?This gap in knowledge is the research problem.
  • How did the author establish the significance of the study? In other words, why should the reader care about this study? Look for statements about human suffering, costs of treatment, or the number of people affected by the clinical problem.
  • Identify the purpose of the study. An author may clearly state the purpose of the study or may describe the purpose as the study goals, objectives, or aims.
  • List research questions that the study was designed to answer. If the author does not explicitly provide the questions, attempt to infer the questions from the answers.
  • Were the purpose and research questions related to the problem?

 Methods of Study

  • Identify the benefits and risks of participation addressed by the authors. Were there benefits or risks the authors do not identify?
  • Was informed consent obtained from the subjects or participants?
  • Did it seem that the subjects participated voluntarily in the study?
  • Was institutional review board approval obtained from the agency in which the study was conducted?
  • Are the major variables (independent and dependent variables) identified and defined? What were these variables?

ORDER YOUR CUSTOM PAPER TODAY

  • How were data collected in this study?
  • What rationale did the author provide for using this data collection method?
  • Identify the time period for data collection of the study.
  • Describe the sequence of data collection events for a participant.
  • Describe the data management and analysis methods used in the study.
  • Did the author discuss how the rigor of the process was assured? For example, does the author describe maintaining a paper trail of critical decisions that were made during the analysis of the data? Was statistical software used to ensure accuracy of the analysis?
  • What measures were used to minimize the effects of researcher bias (their experiences and perspectives)? For example, did two researchers independently analyze the data and compare their analyses?

Results of Study

  • What is the researcher’s interpretation of findings?
  • Are the findings valid or an accurate reflection of reality? Do you have confidence in the findings?
  • What limitations of the study were identified by researchers?
  • Was there a coherent logic to the presentation of findings?
  • What implications do the findings have for nursing practice? For example, can the findingsof the study be applied to general nursing practice, to a specific population, or to a specific area of nursing?
  • What suggestions are made for further studies?

Ethical Considerations

  • Was the study approved by an Institutional Review Board?
  • Was patient privacy protected?
  • Were there ethical considerations regarding the treatment or lack of?

Conclusion

  • Emphasize the importance and congruity of the thesis statement.
  • Provide a logical wrap-up to bring the appraisal to completion and to leave a lasting impression and take-away points useful in nursing practice.
  • Incorporate a critical appraisal and a brief analysis of the utility and applicability of the findings to nursing practice.
  • Integrate a summary of the knowledge learned in the nursing research critique essay.
/by

 How can the nurse, caring for this family, assist with the changes they are about to undergo?

How can the nurse, caring for this family, assist with the changes they are about to undergo?     How can both the family structural theory and the family developmental theory be applied to this scenario?     How can health education enhance health promotion for this family?]]>

/by

Education homework help

***PAPER MUST BE 5 PAGES***
The assignment components and grading specifics are outlined below:
(1) What is the hypothesis of the research?
(2) List and operationalize all independent and dependent variables examined.
(3) What method of data collection was used and the sample examined?
4) Discuss the prior literature reviewed and its relevance to the research problem. Do you believe the literature review is an adequate representation of all relevant studies?
(5) What do the findings suggest?
(6) Can this research be generalized? Why or why not?
(7) How well do you believe the research design chosen was suited to the research question?
(8) How clearly was the data presented and discussed? Do you believe the results are substantively important?
(9) What additional questions or hypotheses are suggested by the study’s results?
(10) What are some of the potential drawbacks of this research?
/by

Qualitative Nursing Research Study Assignment

Qualitative Nursing Research Study Assignment
Select a qualitative nursing research study relevant to your clinical problem and complete the table provided. The research study is to have been published within the last 3 years and must be published in a peer-reviewed nursing journal or the study investigator(s) must be nurses. Reference your article in APA format below the table.
I have provided a discussion thread to make sure your article fits the criteria.
Qualitative Assignment Cite your article in APA frormat
Study Element Directions Response
Purpose of the study State the purpose of the study and identify the problem.
Literature Review Are articles relevant, previous studies and theories described? Are the references current? Describe the current knowledge (what is known and not known) about the research problem
Theoretical Framework Was a theoretical framework discussed?
Research Question Identify the research questions, or hypotheses.
Study Design Identify the specific design of the study.
Sample Describe the sample. How was the sample selected?
Setting Describe the setting
Data Collection How were the data collected? Was there data saturation?
Data Analysis How were the data analyzed?

/by

Accounting homework help

1. A major difference between the private sector and the public sector is the “divide between payer and decider.”   In the private sector, we choose a product and decide if we want to pay for it or not, and then purchase it or not.  In the public sector, we pay taxes into a “pot” where all the taxes from all payers are gathered.  Then our representatives decide how that money should be spent.  What impact does this divide have on budgeting AND on public satisfaction with how funds are spent?
2. The budget cycle (executive preparation, legislative consideration, budget execution, audit) is at least three years long (for one budget year).  How does this extended time period impact the utility of budgets and how we measure the effectiveness of budgeting?
3. Does the budget format selected make any difference in preparing, adopting, implementing or auditing the budget?  What about public understanding of the budget?
4. Has post-1970 “budgetary reform” simply been a struggle for power between the legislative bodies and the executive, or have they been sincere efforts to get spending under control?  If the latter, why does Congress need a law to force them to exercise spending control?
  • attachment

    Chapter3.docx
  • attachment

    pg73.jpg
  • attachment

    pg78.jpg
  • attachment

    pg84.jpg
  • attachment

    pg75.jpg
  • attachment

    pg80.jpg
  • attachment

    pg83.jpg
  • attachment

    pg76.jpg
  • attachment

    pg81.jpg
  • attachment

    pg88.jpg
  • attachment

    pg77.jpg
  • attachment

    pg79.jpg
  • attachment

    pg87.jpg
  • attachment

    pg74.jpg
  • attachment

    pg85.jpg
  • attachment

    pg82.jpg
  • attachment

    pg86.jpg
/by

How nursing informatics or technology in health care will help or hinder leadership

How nursing informatics or technology in health care will help or hinder leadership
Compilation Summarize, in 3-4 pages, this assignment that provides information from Weeks 1 to 4. In addition to the work you completed in the last four weeks, your assignment should also:
• Include an introduction and a conclusion.
• Implement the recommendations from the instructor.
• Describe the role of nursing informatics.
• Explain how nursing informatics or technology in health care will help or hinder your leadership. Support your responses with examples.

/by

Government homework help

For this topic, we are going to have a conversation on the different forms of voter suppression/intimidation. There are many different forms, some of which of depend state by state, some maybe argued or debated over of the legitimacy, but many of the forms listed have plenty of documented record and public consensus of their legitimacy. In the past we have seen such forms as poll taxes, literacy tests and “grandfather clauses”. Today, voter suppression or intimidation has included Voter ID laws, gerrymandering, limiting early voting and underfunded or lack of voting recourses like closing polling sites, limiting ballot boxes for mail-in votes and understaffed polls that create long lines and long waiting periods which may deter people from voting.
PLEASE REVIEW: Visit the link here for a list of forms of voter suppression published by The Voting Rights Alliance. 
Please review the list and pick two forms of voter suppression that are of interest or concern to you. You may choose forms of voter suppression that have been covered in the assigned readings or you may choose others. Take some time and search online, reading different articles and watching different videos to understand what these forms of voter suppression are, how they affect the voter and what has been done or suggested to address that issue. I have extended the deadline to post until next Friday, Nov. 6, so you may want to wait for the assigned readings/videos on Monday that will cover some of the forms mentioned to have a better understanding. This exercise is intended for you to do some of our own exploration on the types of voter suppression and/or intimidation.
Once you have an understanding of the two forms of voter suppression you chose, in your own words described to us in the post, using examples from your sources and tell us what these two forms are and why you chose them and what has been done or suggested to resolve these forms of suppression.
/by

Falls, pressure ulcers, nursing turnover, nursing retention, catheter associated urinary tract infections (CAUTI's)

This week you continue your work on your course project by completing an outline. Falls, pressure ulcers, nursing turnover, nursing retention, catheter associated urinary tract infections (CAUTI’s), central line associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI’s), patient education, communication (be a little more specific…shift-to-shift report, bedside report, nurse-to physician communication, etc.), call light management, hourly rounding, alarm management, bar-coding medication administration, etcRemember, this is only an outline, and not a paper; it does not need to be in paragraph format. You may use bullets or an outline formatting within Microsoft Word. Remember to create a title page and a reference page (if you cite any sources). For this outline, 1-page is the minimum, but it can certainly be more than that. Here is an example outline to get started:

    1. Define your project
      1. What is it? Many people do not know what pressure ulcers, CAUTI or CLABSI, etc. are.
      2. Statistics – What is the prevalence/incidence rates across the US or in your state/region?
    2. Causes (what are some of the causes?)
      1. List one cause here
      2. List another cause here, etc.
    3. Benefits for preventing/fixing/decreasing
      1. List reasons here
    4. How to prevent
      1. List
      2. Methods
      3. Here
    5. Nursing Interventions
      1. What are things nurses can do to help with this topic?
      2. List them here
/by

Ecology homework help

The discovery of the antibiotic Penicillin in the 1920s made a big impact on human history. Not only did it provide a cure for bacterial infections that were once deadly, but it also led to a golden age in discovery of new antibiotics. The great benefit of these drugs is that antibiotics inhibit the growth of bacterial cells or kill them outright, and yet, on the whole, do not harm eukaryotic cells.
Answer BOTH of the following questions:

  1. Given the following list of antibiotics and their targets, explain how each stops bacteria without harming human cells. Base your analyses on the differences between eukaryotic and prokaryotic cells.
  2. Considering the targets of these antibiotics, explain why antibiotics in general would not be useful for treating a viral infection.

Antibiotic                 Target
Penicillin                    Blocks cell wall synthesis
Tetracycline                Blocks protein synthesis by binding to the 30S Unit of the ribosome
Chloramphenicol        Blocks protein synthesis by binding to the 50S Unit of the ribosome
Sulfonamides             Inhibit folic acid synthesis
Vancomycin               Blocks cross-linking of the peptidoglycan in the cell wall
Read this to enhance your understanding of the differences between prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells: How do antibiotics kill bacterial cells but not human cells?
See a comparison of bacterial and viral features here: Differences between bacteria and viruses.
Follow these guidelines for your paper:

  • Utilize at least 1 credible source to support the arguments presented in the paper. Make sure you cite appropriately within your paper, and list the reference(s) in APA format on your Reference page.
  • Your paper should be 1–2 pages in length, not counting the Title page and Reference page.
/by

Measles Outbreak

Please use the selected article link as the case study
Case: Article: Measles Outbreak
Link to article: https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm6406a5.htm?s_cid=mm6406a5_w
 
Prompt: Select a case scenario from the approved case studies for use in the final project (or get approval from instructor for another case scenario) and address the type of public health risk found in the case study. In your journal entry, be sure to address the following critical elements:
Describe the case study. Why is it a public health issue?
How did the issue develop? Answer this question considering your current understanding of microbiology. You will get another chance to examine the development of the public health issue later in the course.
Determine the microbe type at play in the case study (archaea, bacteria, etc.). How did you make that determination? Use examples to support your claim.
Guidelines for Submission: Submit assignment as a Word document with double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, and one-inch margins. Your case selection must be submitted as a 1–2-paragraphs.

/by